Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 22 Dec 2025, 14:43 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Clerk of Work Services · UK public procurement notice

Authority: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (Central government)

ServicesAbove thresholdSME suitable
Sectors: Architecture & Engineering (71) Delivery: Delivery location not published
Planned pipeline value£2,000,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 2 Feb 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 5 yrsends 31 Mar 2031 · starts 1 Apr 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The Trust

Guy’s and St Thomas’ is among the UK’s busiest and most successful NHS foundation trusts. The Trust provides a full range of hospital and community services for people in Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham, as well as specialist care for patients from further afield including cancer, renal, orthopaedic and cardiovascular services. The Trust has the following locations:

  • Guy’s Hospital
  • St Thomas’ hospital
  • Evelina Children’s Hospital
  • Royal Brompton Hospital
  • Harefield Hospital
  • Plus, a number of community-based sites.
  • Royal Brompton and Harefield hospitals provide specialist heart and lung services across the country.
  • Guy's is home to the largest dental school in Europe and a state-of-the-art cancer centre.
  • As part of our commitment to provide care closer to home, we also offer cancer services and kidney treatment at Queen Mary's Hospital in Sidcup.
  • St Thomas' has one of the busiest emergency departments in London. It is also home to Evelina London Children's Hospital.
  • Evelina London cares for local children in Lambeth and Southwark and provides specialist services across southeast England including cardiac, renal and critical care services.
  • Our adult community services teams deliver care at the heart of the local communities we serve, working in partnership with GPs, local authorities and other healthcare and voluntary sector organisations

With over 22,000 staff the Trust is one of the largest local employers, the Trust aims to develop and support all staff, so they are able to deliver high quality, safe and efficient care.

The trust has a reputation for clinical excellence and high-quality teaching and research. The Trust is part of King's Health Partners, one of six accredited UK Academic Health Sciences Centres. In partnership with King's College London the Trust has dedicated clinical research facilities and a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre.

For more information, please see www.guysandstthomas.nhs.uk ↗

Essentia

Essentia is the Estates arm of Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust. Essentia design, build and maintain healthcare infrastructure vital to the smooth running of services. The Capital Delivery Team are responsible for delivering the Trust medium to long term capital plan. The plan includes a variety of projects ranging from full redevelopment and refurbishment of clinical and non-clinical spaces to new buildings.

The Requirement

The Trust is a looking to establish a contract for the provision of a “Clerk of Works” to support its Project and Programme managers in delivering its capital funded programme. The role will require working over all our campus locations – St Thomas’ Hospital, Guy’s Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals.

Schemes range in construction values of £0.5m to £75 million. The annual capital budget is in the region of £80,000,000 although this can be subject to fluctuation.

Projects are due to start from spring 2026 with completion dates in December 2026 up to 2028.

Both NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract and Joint Construction Tribunal (JCT) contracts are used for Main Works contracts in this programme.” It is yet to be decided which form of contract is to be used for this requirement, however we would appreciate feedback on the most suitable option.

The procurement route is yet to be decided, and it is possible that either an open competition or a further competition may be run. Any further competition would be through an NHS England accredited framework www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/system-gui… ↗

We would be looking at awarding a contract for a period of up to 60 months starting April 2026.

We would estimate going out to market in towards the end of January 2026.

Actions

If you would be interested in bidding for this requirement, please email [email protected] with the following information:

  • Company name
  • Company registration number
  • DUNS number
  • Contact email address for receipt of tenders
  • If you are a member of an NHS England accredited frameworks covering Clerk of Works, please provide details.
  1. We would also be interested in feedback on the following questions:
  2. What form of contract would you recommend for this contract and why?
  3. Pricing, what pricing mechanism would you recommend for the contract given that:

a. Workload / volumes are given in good faith however this is dependent on many factors including the capital allocation the Trust receives.

b. Would you recommend:

i. Day rates

ii. Percentage fee based upon construction value

iii. An implant (what would be the “break even “criteria for this solution.

c. How can additional discounts be applied over the length of the contract as the number of projects / spend aggregates?

  1. We are keen to embed real social value in this contract, for example apprenticeships. What is realistically feasible?

CPV: Construction management services · Construction supervision services · Construction-related services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust buys Construction supervision services (CPV 7152), and who usually turns up

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Construction supervision services (CPV 7152) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bidWhat to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 2 of 6 known-size awards · market: CPV 7152 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=13
33%100%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means the winner is registered in the region where that contract was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 4 of 7 known-location awards · market: CPV 7152 · UK-wide, n=6
57%50%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in Greater London.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 3 decided notices · market: division 71 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=124
69 days57 days

Half of these awards were announced within 69 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 5 of 10 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 7152 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=17
50%24%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer16 lots with bid counts · all categories
6% had one bid
The market184 lots with bid counts · division 71 · Greater London (authority’s region)
10% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid6% / 10%
Buyer: 1 of 16 lots with published bid counts. Market: 19 of 184 lots with published bid counts.
2–331% / 19%
Buyer: 5 of 16 lots with published bid counts. Market: 35 of 184 lots with published bid counts.
4–638% / 33%
Buyer: 6 of 16 lots with published bid counts. Market: 61 of 184 lots with published bid counts.
7+25% / 38%
Buyer: 4 of 16 lots with published bid counts. Market: 69 of 184 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer9 lots with estimate and award · all categories
33% below estimate
The market122 lots with estimate and award · division 71 · Greater London (authority’s region)
55% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate33% / 55%
Buyer: 3 of 9 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 67 of 122 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%44% / 27%
Buyer: 4 of 9 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 33 of 122 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate22% / 18%
Buyer: 2 of 9 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 22 of 122 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 715260 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£2.0m
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 184 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet10% single-bid risk
Past bids on 184 similar lots
1 bid10%
19 of 184 similar past lots received 1 bid (10%).
2–319%
35 of 184 similar past lots received 2–3 (19%).
4–633%
61 of 184 similar past lots received 4–6 (33%).
7+38%
69 of 184 similar past lots received 7+ (38%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £2.0m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
22 Dec 2025, 14:43 GMT
Last source update
22 Dec 2025, 14:43 GMT
Authority reference
6352-27
FTS notice number
2025/S 000-085461
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Construction management servicesConstruction supervision servicesConstruction-related services
Delivery area
Not published
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-05fbb2 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

22 Dec 2025 → 1 Apr 2026 · 4 dates
  1. Planning notice published304 days ago
    22 Dec 2025, 14:43 GMT
  2. Market engagement279 days ago
    15 Jan 2026, 23:59 GMT
    1. We would also be interested in feedback on the following questions:
    2. What form of contract would you recommend for this contract and why?
    3. Pricing, what pricing mechanism would you recommend for the contract given that:

    a. Workload / volumes are given in good faith however this is dependent on many factors including the capital allocation the Trust receives.

    b. Would you recommend:

    i. Day rates

    ii. Percentage fee based upon construction value

    iii. An implant (what would be the “break even “criteria for this solution.

    c. How can additional discounts be applied over the length of the contract as the number of projects / spend aggregates?

    1. We are keen to embed real social value in this contract, for example apprenticeships. What is realistically feasible?
  3. Tender notice expected261 days ago
    2 Feb 2026, 23:59 GMT
  4. Contract starts204 days ago
    1 Apr 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    22 Dec 2025, 14:43 GMT
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PDZC-6438-DGPX Great Maze Pond, London, London, SE1 9RTContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure