Official UK procurement notice
Technical Services Framework — UK public procurement notice
Authority: The Crown Estate (Central government)
What is being bought13 lots · detail below
Published requirement descriptionThe Framework is being established to provide access to specialist technical services across The Crown Estate's diverse UK portfolio. It is intended to support the delivery of portfolio strategies, operational priorities and strategic objectives by providing access to specialist expertise, independent advice and additional capacity. The Framework will support specific portfolio initiatives, projects and wider business requirements where additional technical capability is required.
To ensure access to sector-specific expertise and specialist market capability, the Technical Services Framework has been divided into the following Lots:
• Lot 1 – Minerals
• Lot 2 – Telecoms
• Lot 3 – Transmission
• Lot 4 – Oil & Gas Pipelines
• Lot 5 – Coastal
• Lot 6 – Marine Infrastructure (excluding Ports)
• Lot 7 – Ports and Infrastructure
• Lot 8 – Aquaculture
• Lot 9 – Nature
• Lot 10 – Carbon Capture, Usage and Storage (CCUS)
• Lot 11 – New Energies
• Lot 12 – Offshore Wind
. Lot 13 – Integrated Energy
- How the procedure runs: TCE Technical Services Framework PSQ and ITT
CPV: Business and management consultancy and related services · Business and management consultancy services · Marine research services · Marine services · Marine survey services · Research and development consultancy services · Research and development services and related consultancy services · Research consultancy services
How this framework works
From the published notice- Type
- Closed framework
- Call-offs
- every call-off is a further competition among the appointed suppliers
- Framework period
- 3 yrs · up to 6 yrs from 1 Apr 2027
Published description of the framework
As per the tender documents
Lots and requirements (13)Procurement structure
13 lots · all with a published valueEvery one of these 12 lots carries the same published figure, £738,460: it is the framework's maximum for the whole notice, not each lot's own budget, and no share per lot is published. The cards below say ceiling above rather than repeat it.
Lot #1MineralsRenewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #2TelecomsRenewalPublished value£728,460
- Value
- £728,460 exc. VAT · £923,076 inc. VAT
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #3TransmissionRenewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #4Oil & Gas PipelinesRenewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #5CoastalRenewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #6Marine Infrastructure (excluding Ports)Renewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #7PortsRenewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #8AquacultureRenewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #9NatureRenewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #10Carbon Capture, Usage and Storage (CCUS)Renewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #11New EnergiesRenewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #12Offshore WindRenewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
Lot #13Integrated EnergyRenewalceiling above
- Extensions
- 3+1+1+1 · 3+1+1+1
Award criteria (2)
- Technical — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
- Commercial — The quality criteria will account for 80% of the total score. Tender responses will be evaluated in line with the scoring criteria in tender documents. Questions that are labelled “For Information Only” and “Pass/Fail” are not evaluated. Tenderers must provide a full response to the questions contained in the Quality Section on the Tender Portal. Tender responses must comply with the Instructions set out in Section 2 of the ITT document. Any word limits, referred to on the Tender Portal for a question are the maximum number of words applicable to the relevant response. No additional information or supplementary documentation should be appended to these responses. Any additional information provided with a Tender response will be disregarded and will not be scored as part of the evaluation process. Commercial Evaluation The commercial criteria will account for 20% of the total score. The commercial criteria will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology in the ITT documents.
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
- “Technical Services Framework” is a framework — the contest is a place on its panel, not a single contract — each call-off is a further competition, so the pricing contest starts after appointment.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How The Crown Estate buys Engineering-related scientific and technical services (CPV 7135) — and who usually turns up
The Crown Estate’s own published record, next to the Greater London market for the same work. This notice is a framework or DPS, so only frameworks and DPS are compared. Whole-market view: Engineering-related scientific and technical services (CPV 7135) →
How the contest usually goes
This buyer’s published record next to the market where the work is delivered — contested contracts only, counted per lot
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
No small-firm winners recorded among this authority’s published awards in this sample.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in Greater London.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Winner locations not published for this authority. Local means a registered address in Greater London.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 115 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid0% / 0%
2–313% / 55%
4–613% / 19%
7+75% / 26%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
On a framework or DPS, prices are agreed when work is called off.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Not comparable on a framework or DPS. The notice sets up a supplier panel and a ceiling value; what the work actually costs is agreed later, on each call-off or mini-competition, and those publish as contract notices of their own. The award-vs-estimate record of this market therefore sits on the call-offs — this page shows it on the contracts, not on the panel that frames them.
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors — from published award history, not a bid list
The matcher links this notice to “Commercial Advisory Services (Marine) Framework Agreement” of this authority, but none of the 5 panel members sit in a category matching this notice.
Lot #1MineralsCPV 71354500Published value£738,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–34%
4–612%
7+84%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £7.4bn67 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 16 live · £5.5bn iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=15 | |
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 | |
Waterman AspenLarge | £1.0m16 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 3 live · £259k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Lot #2TelecomsCPV 71354500Published value£728,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–34%
4–613%
7+84%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £7.4bn67 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 16 live · £5.5bn iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=15 | |
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 | |
Waterman AspenLarge | £1.0m16 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 3 live · £259k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Lot #3TransmissionCPV 71354500Published value£738,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–33%
4–613%
7+84%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £7.4bn67 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 16 live · £5.5bn iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=15 | |
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 | |
Waterman AspenLarge | £1.0m16 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 3 live · £259k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Lot #4Oil & Gas PipelinesCPV 71354500Published value£738,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–32%
4–612%
7+86%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £7.4bn67 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 16 live · £5.5bn iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=15 | |
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 | |
Waterman AspenLarge | £1.0m16 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 3 live · £259k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Lot #5CoastalCPV 71354500Published value£738,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–33%
4–616%
7+82%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £7.4bn67 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 16 live · £5.5bn iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=15 | |
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 | |
Waterman AspenLarge | £1.0m16 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 3 live · £259k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Lot #6Marine Infrastructure (excluding Ports)CPV 71354500Published value£738,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–32%
4–614%
7+83%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 | |
| £590k21 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 8 live · £41m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 37% below n=2 | |
Waterman AspenLarge | £1.0m16 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 3 live · £259k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Lot #7PortsCPV 71354500Published value£738,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–33%
4–615%
7+82%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £7.4bn67 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 16 live · £5.5bn iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=15 | |
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 | |
Waterman AspenLarge | £1.0m16 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 3 live · £259k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Lot #8AquacultureCPV 71354500Published value£738,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–32%
4–613%
7+84%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetra TechWorked for this buyer | Ecological Surveys Advisor ITTruns to Oct 2028 | — | £2.5m | 77% match |
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £7.4bn67 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 16 live · £5.5bn iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=15 | |
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Tetra TechLarge | £2.9m26 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 7 live · £3.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 23% above n=3 |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 |
Lot #9NatureCPV 71354500Published value£738,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–34%
4–613%
7+83%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £7.4bn67 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 16 live · £5.5bn iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=15 | |
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 | |
Waterman AspenLarge | £1.0m16 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 3 live · £259k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Lot #10Carbon Capture, Usage and Storage (CCUS)CPV 71354500Published value£738,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–32%
4–610%
7+88%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetra TechWorked for this buyer | Ecological Surveys Advisor ITTruns to Oct 2028 | — | £2.5m | 76% match |
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
AtkinsRéalis UK LtdLarge | £138m96 awards in 36m · last this month | 30 live · £189m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=12 |
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Tetra TechLarge | £2.9m26 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 7 live · £3.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 23% above n=3 |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 |
Lot #11New EnergiesCPV 71354500Published value£738,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–32%
4–614%
7+83%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £7.4bn67 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 16 live · £5.5bn iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=15 | |
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 | |
Waterman AspenLarge | £1.0m16 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 3 live · £259k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Lot #12Offshore WindCPV 71354500Published value£738,460
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–33%
4–614%
7+83%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetra TechWorked for this buyer | Ecological Surveys Advisor ITTruns to Oct 2028 | — | £2.5m | 78% match |
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £23m54 awards in 36m · last this month | 14 live · £1.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs | |
Carbon60Large | £16m3 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 1 live · £12m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Tetra TechLarge | £2.9m26 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 7 live · £3.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 23% above n=3 |
| £17m6 awards in 36m · last 4 months ago | 1 live · £248k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 15% below n=4 | |
Waterman AspenLarge | £1.0m16 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 3 live · £259k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
Lot #13Integrated EnergyCPV 71354500Published value£738,460
Expected competition: 12 bids · 2% single-bid risk. This notice runs to more than 12 lots, so the full read — candidate suppliers, the bid distribution and who has supplied this buyer — is shown on the first 12. The forecast above is this lot’s own.
Coverage and what to read with care
- Each figure explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two sides are never blended. A lot’s own market is read at its delivery region where the lot names one; where it names several, or none that can be resolved, the chart falls back to the UK-wide record for the same category and says so under the bar. An empty cell means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
- When we call out a difference. A buyer figure is only flagged against the market when the sample is large enough that the gap is unlikely to be chance; at most two callouts appear, always phrased as a comparison with both numbers and the sample size.
- Coverage (re-measured 5 Oct on the live record, 94,497 awarded procedures of the last three years). 51 % publish a bid count and 72 % a delivery region, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice names none, labelled. Of the 17,687 award-vs-estimate pairs, 34 % sit exactly on the estimate — the buyer published the award at the figure it advertised. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden, and a distribution is not drawn as percentages below ten observations.
- “Match”, text similarity, the expected-bid figure and the distribution drawn beneath it are model outputs, not published facts or win probabilities. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Competitive flexible procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open admission
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Framework agreement
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- No (one-off requirement)
- First published
- 2 Oct 2026, 11:14 BST
- Last source update
- 2 Oct 2026, 11:14 BST
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end — 15 Mar 2027, 23:59 GMT
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-091615- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Not published
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-077bebFind a Tender
- How it runs
- TCE Technical Services Framework PSQ and ITT
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Apply via In-tend- Expression of interest (EOI)
- —
- Appointment period ends
- 26 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Clarification deadline
- 7 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Timeline
6 published dates · Europe/London- Tender notice published9 days ago28 Sept 2026, 18:22 BST
- Latest notice published6 days ago2 Oct 2026, 11:14 BST
- Clarification questions by1 day ago7 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Admission / appointment period endsin 18 days · period end, not a bid countdown26 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Award decision expected byin 159 days15 Mar 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 175 days1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Notice history
2 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 28 Sept 2026- Tender notice published2 Oct 2026, 11:14 BSTUK4
- Tender notice published28 Sept 2026, 18:22 BSTUK4
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (4)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Bidding documents and specifications
- Conflict of interest declarationNot published
Notices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender