Official UK procurement notice
Anticoagulation Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)
Authority: Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionBackground
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust is seeking to engage with the market in relation to the provision of a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) for anticoagulation management.
The Trust is seeking a proven, fully integrated Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) to support the safe and effective management of patients receiving anticoagulation therapy across two acute hospital sites.
The replacement solution must support a high-volume, clinically critical service currently managing more than 800 patients, with approximately 200 anticoagulation dosing decisions undertaken each week. Given the high-risk nature of anticoagulant medicines, the Trust requires a mature, clinically validated system capable of supporting safe prescribing, efficient clinic operations, and robust governance arrangements.
The Trust currently utilises the RAID anticoagulation system, which will be unsupported from 30th November 2026. A replacement system is therefore required to ensure continuity of a critical clinical service managing high-risk patients.
The service currently supports:
- Over 800 anticoagulated patients
- Approximately 200 dosing decisions per week
- Multi-site delivery across two hospital locations
Requirements
The Trust is seeking a system capable of delivering end-to-end anticoagulation management, including (but not limited to):
Core Functional Requirements
- Management of the full anticoagulation patient pathway, including:
- Patient registration and demographic management
- Recording of treatment indications and target INR ranges
- Dose calculation and prescribing support
- Scheduling of follow-up tests and appointments
- Clinically validated, algorithm-based warfarin dosing
- Patient tracking, recall, and monitoring functionality
- Clinic scheduling and workload management
- Full audit trail and reporting capability
- Real-time dashboards (e.g. TTR, safety metrics)
Integration Requirements
- Integration with NHS pathology systems (automated INR result transfer)
- Full interoperability with EPIC Electronic Patient Record systems is mandatory to allow the transfer and recording of test results, dosing decisions and clinical notes.
- Compliance with NHS interoperability standards
Clinical & Governance Requirements
- Evidence of clinical safety and validation (e.g. DCB0129 / DCB0160 compliance)
- Established use within NHS organisations or comparable healthcare environments, with demonstrable reference sites.
- Functionality to support medicines governance, audit, and regulatory compliance, including requirements of the Care Quality Commission.
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust is particularly interested in solutions that are already established within the NHS, demonstrate a strong track record of safe anticoagulation management and can be implemented within the required timeframe to ensure continuity of this critical clinical service.
CPV: Clinical information system · Software implementation services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust buys Information systems (CPV 4881), and who usually turns up
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Information systems (CPV 4881) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in South East England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in South East England.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 49 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid14%
2–357%
4–629%
7+0%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate57%
Within ±2%21%
Above estimate21%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 4881Published estimate£80k
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 39 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid10%
2–326%
4–641%
7+23%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 1 May 2026, 15:14 BST
- Last source update
- 1 May 2026, 15:14 BST
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-040652- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-069091Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
1 May 2026 → 1 Aug 2026 · 3 dates- Planning notice published172 days ago1 May 2026, 15:14 BST
- Market engagement159 days ago14 May 2026, 23:59 BST
The Authority is currently assessing the market to determine the appropriate procurement route.
This notice is issued for market engagement purposes only and does not constitute a call for competition.
The Authority invites responses from suppliers who believe they can meet the requirements outlined above.
Interested suppliers are requested to provide via email to [email protected]:
- Overview of their solution
- Evidence of:
- Algorithm-based anticoagulation dosing capability
- Clinical validation and safety assurance
- Details of existing deployments within the NHS
- Integration capabilities with EPIC EPR system
- Implementation timescales
- Indicative pricing model
Following this market engagement, the Authority will:
- Assess the level of market capability
- Determine whether a competitive procurement process is appropriate
- Contract starts81 days ago1 Aug 2026, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published1 May 2026, 15:14 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender