Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Large organisation·Wakefield·Nationwide (UK)·Main market: Miscellaneous health services
Find a Tender organisation id177354Websiteyas.nhs.uk ↗
Where they wini
i
11 awards (11 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 11 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
8514 Miscellaneous health services6 awards · 55% · awards naming a lot8510 Health services3 awards · 27% · awards naming a lotAttributable award value
£1.2bnOn 9 of 11 award records; the five largest make 97%. Largest rows below.i
Typical attributable award
£33m middle valuerobust · n=9i
Largest published awards i | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 999 A&E Ambulance Service | NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board | — | — | £450,395,037 † |
| 999 A&E Services covering the Yorkshire and Humber Region | NHS West Yorkshire | — | — | £395,375,823 † |
| NHS Integrated 111 and Urgent Care Service (Yorkshire and Humber) | NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board | — | — | £191,142,000 † |
| NHS SY ICB - Non-Emergency Patient Transport - Core | NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board | — | — | £52,909,170 † |
| Non-Emergency Patient Transport Services (NEPTS) | NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board | — | — | £32,500,000 † |
Where their buyers arei
i
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 11 of 11 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Yorkshire and the Humber11 procedures · 100%
Who they sell toi
i
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
NHS & health82%(9 awards)
9 of 11 awards are NHS & health (82%).Type not classified18%(2 awards)
2 of 11 awards are Type not classified (18%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board | 5 | 45.5% | 5 | 31 Mar 2026 |
| NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board | 2 | 18.2% | 2 | 22 Aug 2025 |
| NHS West Yorkshire | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 4 Jul 2024 |
| Airedale NHS Foundation Trust | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 31 May 2026 |
| Health Education England | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 31 Dec 2021 |
| Blenheim House | 1 | 9.1% | 1 | 13 Apr 2022 |
Share = of the 11 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Recent awards
Latest 11 of 11 award records naming this supplier
| Award / procedure | Authority | Awarded | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| NHS Education & Training - Yorkshire Ambulance Service | Blenheim House | Not published | Not published |
About this data
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 0 of 11 awards, estimated from the published duration on 0 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.