Wye Valley NHS Trust: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
Large organisation·Hereford·Nationwide (UK)·Main market: Hospital and related services
Find a Tender organisation id172966Websitewyevalley.nhs.uk ↗
Where they wini
i
8 awards (7 for a named lot, 88%, 1 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 8 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
8511 Hospital and related services4 awards · 50% · awards naming a lot8510 Health services1 award · 13% · whole-procedure awards8513 Dental practice and related services1 award · 13% · awards naming a lotAttributable award value
£87mOn 6 of 8 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.i
Typical attributable award
£20m middle valuerobust · n=6i
Largest published awards i | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community Dental Services for Herefordshire [Direct Award Process C] | NHS Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care Board | — | — | £25,704,544 † |
| Systemic Anti Cancer Oncology Services provided by Wye Valley NHS Trust | Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | — | 1 yrs | £20,977,791 † ≈ £21m/yr |
| Systemic Anti Cancer Oncology Services provided by Wye Valley NHS Trust | Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | — | — | £19,943,820 † |
| Systemic Anti Cancer Oncology Services provided by Wye Valley NHS Trust | Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | — | — | £19,943,820 † |
| Specialised Commissioning Acute Services- Midlands | NHS England | — | — | £523,138 † |
Where their buyers arei
i
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 7 of 7 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
West Midlands2 procedures · 29%
Greater London2 procedures · 29%
South West England2 procedures · 29%
Yorkshire and the Humber1 procedure · 14%
Who they sell toi
i
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
NHS & health88%(7 awards)
7 of 8 awards are NHS & health (88%).Type not classified13%(1 award)
1 of 8 awards is Type not classified (13%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | 2 | 28.6% | 3 | 9 Apr 2025 |
| NHS England | 2 | 28.6% | 2 | 8 Sept 2025 |
| NHS Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care Board | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 25 Feb 2026 |
| Health Education England | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 2 Feb 2022 |
| Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 8 Sept 2026 |
Share = of the 7 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Recent awards
Latest 8 of 8 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 3 of 8 awards, estimated from the published duration on 0 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.