The Nurture Group Network LTD: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)Stansted MountfitchetEast of EnglandMain market: Special education services

Official UK PPONPJBY-1341-XWCH

Procedures with an award33 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities2named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£893knet · on 1 of 3 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Places on lists and panels11 place · lists worth £4.1m in total, shared with other providers, not its revenue
i

Approved provider lists and panels this supplier is on.

Procedures where the same published amount is awarded to three or more suppliers: the total of the list, repeated on every place. Each list counts once in the total.

A place on a list is not money won. The total belongs to the whole list.

Last 12 months1awards · 1 in the prior 24 months · last 24 Jul 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Buyer regions2most often Yorkshire and the Humber
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.

3 awards (3 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 3

8034 Special education services1 awards · 33% · lots
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£893kOn 1 of 3 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 1 wins across all categories. Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

0.7% below estimateindicative · n=1compared within all comparable wins
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Whole School Approaches to NurtureKent County Council——£893,300 †

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 3 of 3 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Yorkshire and the Humber2 procedures · 67%
South East England1 procedures · 33%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Local authority100%(3 awards)
    3 of 3 awards are Local authority (100%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
The North Yorkshire Councilframework/DPS on 1266.7%224 Jul 2026
Kent County Council133.3%11 Sept 2021

Share = of the 3 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Recent awards

Latest 3 of 3 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Framework Agreement relating to Inclusion ServicesThe North Yorkshire Council24 Jul 2026£0
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
Provision of Services to the North Yorkshire Locality BoardsThe North Yorkshire CouncilNot published£4,090,696 †
list or panel total · repeated on other suppliers, not counted as its value
Whole School Approaches to NurtureKent County CouncilNot published£893,300 †
from the contract notice
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 3 of 3 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.