The Financial Times Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Large organisationLondonGreater LondonMain market: Subscription services

Official UK PPONPNWZ-4265-TLJN

Where they win
i

7 awards (7 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 7 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

7998 Subscription services4 awards · 57% · awards naming a lot
2221 Newspapers1 award · 14% · awards naming a lot
7222 Systems and technical consultancy services1 award · 14% · awards naming a lot
7934 Advertising and marketing services1 award · 14% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i
£426kOn 7 of 7 award records; the five largest make 94%. Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i
£28k middle valuerobust · n=7

Where their buyers are
i

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 7 of 7 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Greater London6 procedures · 86%
Wales (Cymru)1 procedure · 14%

Who they sell to
i

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
  • Central government86%(6 awards)
    6 of 7 awards are Central government (86%).
  • Education14%(1 award)
    1 of 7 awards is Education (14%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Department for Business & Trade114.3%18 Jun 2026
University of South Wales114.3%13 Oct 2025
Competition and Markets Authority114.3%13 Dec 2025
Department for Transport114.3%13 Oct 2025
Department for Culture, Media & Sport114.3%12 Apr 2026
Department for Work & Pensions114.3%119 Jun 2026
NS&I114.3%18 Apr 2025

Share = of the 7 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

7 of 7 awards carry an end date · not a retender forecast

Recent awards

Latest 7 of 7 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Enterprise License Subscription to the Financial TimesDepartment for Business & Trade8 Jun 2026£244,342
Financial Times Direct AwardDepartment for Work & PensionsNot published£13,547 †
from the contract notice
Financial Times Subscription 26/27Department for Culture, Media & SportNot published£22,791 †
from the contract notice
Financial Times (FT) subscription renewalCompetition and Markets AuthorityNot published£51,388 †
from the contract notice
Annual Agreement for Financial Adviser activityNS&INot published£10,000 †
from the contract notice
The Financial Times Limited 2025-2027University of South WalesNot published£55,268 †
from the contract notice
DfT Award of Financial Times (FT) SubscriptionDepartment for TransportNot published£28,454 †
from the contract notice
About this data
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 7 of 7 awards, estimated from the published duration on 0 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.