NETWORK RAIL: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Large organisationLONDONGreater LondonMain market: Consultative engineering and construction services

Official UK PPONPNZN-9524-VCQJWebsitenetworkrail.co.uk ↗

Procedures with an award77 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities5named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£7.2mnet · on 6 of 7 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months6awards · 0 in the prior 24 months · last 29 Sept 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months4end date published on 6 of 7 awards
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Delivery regions3most often North East England
i

Where this supplier has delivered.

Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.

Where the work was, not where the company is based.

Where they win
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

7 lot-level observations (7 awarded lots, 100%, plus 0 envelope awards without lot links; pending awards included) · top CPV classes

Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£7.2mOn 6 of 7 award records; the five largest make 99%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£2.3m inc. VAT, kept apart). Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£496k middle valuerobust · n=6
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Provision of Engineering Trains, On Track Machines and Associated Services for CVL Works Transport for Wales (TFW)7 May 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£4,950,000
≈ £1.6m/yr
South Bank Train Station - demolition of existing footbridge and installation of a new interim footbridgeTees Valley Combined Authority—3.1 yrs · up to 4.1 yrs£1,083,625 †
≈ £351k/yr
TVCA-PROC-0350 - Development of a feasibility study for the decarbonisation of the rail network in the Tees Valley.Tees Valley Combined Authority12 Jan 20261.5 yrs · up to 2 yrs£667,050
≈ £445k/yr
TVCA-PROC-0595a - Development of South Bank Rail Station - ECI & DesignTees Valley Combined Authority2 Dec 20251 yrs · up to 1.5 yrs£325,427
≈ £325k/yr
Smart Street Lighting - Network Rail - BAPACity of Bradford Metropolitan District Council29 Jun 20266 mo£100,000

Where they deliver
i

Where this supplier has delivered.

Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.

Where the work was, not where the company is based.

ITL1 delivery regions on the notice · 5 of 7 awarded procedures publish one · a procedure with several regions counts in each

North East England3 procedures · 60%
Yorkshire and the Humber1 procedures · 20%
Wales (Cymru)1 procedures · 20%

Who they sell to
i

Which buyers publish the most notices here.

Buyers ranked by the number of notices, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · award records explode on framework and DPS panels

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies buy here.

Notices by the buyer’s type as published, otherwise by its name.

  • Local authority 57% (4 awards)
  • Other public body 29% (2 awards)
  • Central government 14% (1 awards)
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Tees Valley Combined Authority342.9%37 Aug 2026
Transport for Wales (TFW)114.3%17 May 2026
ATOC Limited114.3%131 Mar 2026
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council114.3%129 Jun 2026
National Highways Limited114.3%129 Sept 2026

Share = of the 7 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 6 of 7 awards carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent awards

Latest 7 of 7 award records naming this supplier

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS award and contract releases. An award record is one award × this supplier; a procedure can carry many (panels, call-offs).
  • Market observations are awarded lots, or one envelope award when the notice publishes no lot links. Region = delivery ITL1 on the notice, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Authority type: official OCDS UK contracting-authority type when the notice publishes one; otherwise a Tenderline name/id class; otherwise “not classified”. Purchasing hubs with no published type stay unclassified.
  • Published value attributable to this supplier alone: £7.2m across single-supplier awards, framework / DPS ceilings excluded. Coverage is partial and the figure is not turnover, so it is not shown as a headline.
  • Contract end dates: published on 6 of 7 awards; 4 end within 18 months.
  • Each figure’s own method and sample is behind its ; the long form is on Methodology.
  • Never shown: contact details, reliability or payment scores, affiliations, predicted wins.