COMPLEAT SOFTWARE LIMITED: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyNewbury,BerkshireSouth East EnglandMain market: Financial analysis and accounting software package

Companies House03659980 ↗ · Active

Where they win
i

3 awards (3 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 3 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

Attributable award value
i
£39kOn 1 of 3 award records; the five largest make 100%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£84k inc. VAT, kept apart). Largest rows below.
Largest published awards
i
AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
SIA 957 - Compleat SoftwareSecurity Industry Authority17 Aug 20261 yrs · up to 2 yrs£39,285
≈ £39k/yr

Where their buyers are
i

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 3 of 3 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

North West England1 procedure · 33%
Greater London1 procedure · 33%
South West England1 procedure · 33%

Bidding record
i

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notice names this supplier since 10 Jun 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Contract lots contested
i
0 won · 0 lostFewer than three decided lots: no rate is claimed.
Framework / DPS places
i
1 of 1
Authorities bid for
i
1
NoticeAuthorityOutcomeBiddersPublished
Framework to provide Purchase to Pay and Education Supply Solutionsframework/DPSTHE WHITE HORSE FEDERATIONappointed910 Jun 2026

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
  • Other public body67%(2 awards)
    2 of 3 awards are Other public body (67%).
  • Central government33%(1 award)
    1 of 3 awards is Central government (33%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Security Industry Authority133.3%117 Aug 2026
THE WHITE HORSE FEDERATIONframework/DPS on 1133.3%11 Apr 2026
The Riverside Group Limited133.3%122 Jul 2026

Share = of the 3 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Recent awards

Latest 3 of 3 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
SIA 957 - Compleat SoftwareSecurity Industry Authority17 Aug 2026£39,285
Lot 1 - Procure to PayTHE WHITE HORSE FEDERATION1 Apr 2026£10,000,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
Provision of legacy P2P Software - Archive/Read OnlyThe Riverside Group LimitedNot publishedNot published
About this data
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 2 of 3 awards, estimated from the published duration on 0 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.