Cambridge University Press: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
SME·CAMBRIDGE·East of England·Main market: Research and experimental development services
Official UK PPONPWLY-1265-BRCD
i
How many tenders this supplier has won.
Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.
i
How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.
Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.
i
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.
Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
Where they wini
In which categories this supplier wins.
Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.
i
In which categories this supplier wins.
Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.
14 awards (14 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 14
7310 Research and experimental development services2 awards · 14% · lotsi
How much this supplier has won, by published values.
Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.
Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.
i
What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cambridge University Press Cambridge Core e-books Evidence-based Acquisition 2022-2023 | Jisc Services Limited | — | — | £463,657 † |
| CUP Core Ebooks Agreement 2023 - 2024 | Jisc Services Limited | — | — | £463,657 † |
| Cambridge University Press Cambridge Core e-books Evidence-based Acquisition 2022-2023 | Jisc Services Limited | — | — | £199,020 † |
| Follow on optimisation for UKCA as part of NG-R2C | Met Office | — | 5 mo | £63,000 † |
| Biodiversity | Met Office | — | 1 mo | £30,210 † |
Where they deliveri
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
i
Where this supplier has delivered.
Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.
Where the work was, not where the company is based.
ITL1 delivery regions on the notice · 12 of 12 awarded procedures publish one · a procedure with several regions counts in each
Bidding recordi
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
i
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notices name this supplier, covering 2 lots since 18 May 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate
i
Competitions this supplier is known to have bid in.
Lots on Procurement Act 2023 award notices naming it as a bidder, split into won and lost. The lot is the contest: three lots of a ten-lot notice is three wins and seven losses.
i
Frameworks and DPS this supplier got onto.
Lots appointed out of lots applied for. Kept apart from contract wins because almost every compliant bidder gets a place.
i
How many public bodies this supplier has bid to.
Buyers on notices that name it as a bidder, win or lose.
| Notice | Authority | Outcome | Bidders | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Framework for Applied Science Technology Engineering Requirements (FASTER) | Met Office | appointed to 1 of 2 lots | 56 | 18 May 2026 |
Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.
Who they sell toi
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
i
Which public bodies award work to this supplier.
Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.
Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.
Central government36%(5 awards)
5 of 14 awards are Central government (36%).Type not classified36%(5 awards)
5 of 14 awards are Type not classified (36%).Other public body29%(4 awards)
4 of 14 awards are Other public body (29%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jisc Services Limited | 4 | 33.3% | 5 | 23 Oct 2024 |
| Jisc | 3 | 25% | 4 | 29 May 2026 |
| Met Office | 3 | 25% | 3 | 1 Apr 2026 |
| Digital Health & Care Wales | 1 | 8.3% | 1 | 22 Dec 2025 |
| UK Research & Innovation (UKRI) | 1 | 8.3% | 1 | 9 Dec 2025 |
Share = of the 12 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Contracts endingi
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
i
Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.
Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.
An end date does not confirm a new procurement.
Published end dates only · 13 of 14 awards carry one · not a retender forecast
| Contract | Ends | Published value |
|---|---|---|
| Cambridge University Press (CUP) Cambridge Core eBooks Evidence Based Acquisition 2026-2027 | 31 Jul 2027 | £515,025 |
| STAHL Online | 31 Dec 2027 | £12,077 |
Recent awards
Latest 14 of 14 award records naming this supplier
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 13 of 14 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.