OXFORDSHIRE LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP LIMITED: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: PRI/LTD BY GUAR/NSC (Private, limited by guarantee, no share capital)South East EnglandOxford

Companies House09519056 ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months8+14% vs prior 12 months (7)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot513.8% single-bid · 29 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 29 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share53%of 15 awarded procedures · 30 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

15 awarded tenders, 30 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months123 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published award value, 24m£6.9mnet · on 40 of 43 published values · 3 repeated amounts set aside · top 5 = 60%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 15 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(15 notices)
    15 of 15 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Open53%(8 notices)
    8 of 15 notices are Open (53%).
  • Direct award47%(7 notices)
    7 of 15 notices are Direct award (47%).
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 29 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

5robust · n=2913.8% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 8 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

22 daysrobust · n=8
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 15 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

06 of 15 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 28 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0.6% below estimaterobust · n=28

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
ALP SYNERGY LIMITED426.7%4410 Mar 2026
The Skills Centre London Ltd213.3%2320 Apr 2026
OSEP CIC213.3%2218 May 2026
Fareport Training Organisation213.3%2220 Apr 2026
Think Employment Ltd213.3%2220 Apr 2026
ASPIRE OXFORDSHIRE COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE LTD.16.7%1225 Jun 2025
NEW COLLEGE DURHAM16.7%1220 Apr 2026
Palladium International Limited16.7%1210 Nov 2025

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 53% of 15 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 30 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£6.9mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 40 of 43 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 60%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£91k middle valuerobust · n=40Middle half £41k–£122k; 3 awards with ambiguous equal values within a procedure excluded from both figures.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Connect to Work - Individual Placement and Support Pathway OxfordshirePalladium International Limited10 Nov 20254.3 yrs · up to 6.3 yrs£3,365,555
≈ £777k/yr
Oxfordshire Growth Hub Business SupportALP SYNERGY LIMITED10 Mar 20261 yrs · up to 2 yrs£289,080
≈ £289k/yr
Lot 2. Data SkillsJust IT Training Limited7 Aug 20251.1 yrs · up to 2.1 yrs£198,467
≈ £183k/yr
Lot 4. Cyber SecurityThink Employment Ltd7 Aug 20251.1 yrs · up to 2.1 yrs£185,624
≈ £171k/yr
Lot 5. Project ManagementPitman Training Group Limited15 Oct 202511 mo · up to 1.9 yrs£150,000

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 24 of 25 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 12 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 20 of 20 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Skills Bootcamps for Oxfordshire 2026/711 lotsBusiness services: lawAwarded / complete23 Sept 2026£1,093,000
Review of Business and Intellectual Property Centre and Enterprise Oxfordshire Business Support deliveryAwarded / complete11 Sept 2026—
Communications agency recruitmentMarketing servicesAwarded / complete11 Sept 2026£15,000
Business Support for Organisations with Alternative Business ModelsAwarded / complete16 Jun 2026—
Oxfordshire Growth Hub Business SupportBusiness services: lawAwarded / complete22 May 2026£296,000
Compliance supportAwarded / complete18 May 2026—
Social enterprise supportAwarded / complete18 May 2026—
Connect to Work - Individual Placement and Support Pathway OxfordshireRecruitment servicesAwarded / complete6 Feb 2026£3,657,233
Skills Bootcamps for Oxfordshire 2025/2 - Phase 33 lotsEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete16 Dec 2025£214,000
No LimitsAwarded / complete8 Dec 2025—
Business Support Programme for Oxfordshire's High StreetsBusiness services: lawAwarded / complete20 Nov 2025£33,000
Skills Bootcamps for Oxfordshire 2025/2 - Phase 29 lotsEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete13 Nov 2025£1,152,500
Skills Bootcamps for Oxfordshire 2025/2 - Phase 16 lotsEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete31 Oct 2025£886,000
Cherwell Business Support ProgrammeAwarded / complete13 Jun 2025—
West Oxfordshire Business Support ProgrammeAwarded / complete12 Jun 2025—
Skills Bootcamps for OxfordshireEducation and training servicesAwarded / complete31 Oct 2024£280,000
Skills Bootcamps for Oxfordshire10 lotsBusiness services: lawCancelled5 Jul 2024£1,474,000
Oxfordshire Growth Hub Business SupportBusiness services: lawOpen1 Feb 2023£400,000
Business Support Services for the Create Growth ProgrammeBusiness services: lawAwarded / complete3 Oct 2022£200,000
Oxfordshire Social Contract ProgrammeBusiness services: lawOpen1 Jun 2022£400,000

Search all 20 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 24 of 25 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.