Defence Science and Technology Laboratory: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyGOV.UK register: Executive agencyCentral governmentSouth West EnglandSalisbury

Official UK PPONPDDM-1961-MTLN

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed.

Notices, last 12 months83+144% vs prior 12 months (34)
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Typical bids per lot250% single-bid · 10 bid reports
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

Top-3 supplier share8%of 118 awarded procedures · 104 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

118 awarded tenders, 104 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

Contracts ending ≤18 months227 within 6 months
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published award value, 24m£15mnet · on 95 of 105 single-supplier awards · top 5 = 64%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 117 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract 99% (116 notices)
  • Framework 1% (1 notices)
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Direct award 62% (72 notices)
  • Open 13% (15 notices)
  • Route not published 13% (15 notices)
  • Limited / restricted 9% (11 notices)
  • Selective 3% (4 notices)
Typical bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.

Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.

Based on 10 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.

Last 24 months, all categories.

2robust · n=1050% of lots drew a single bid
Deadline → award
i

How long this buyer takes to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from deadline to first award notice, on this buyer’s own tenders.

Based on 9 decided tenders across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

61 daysrobust · n=9
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 117 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

021 of 117 notices amended
Award vs estimate
i

Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.

Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.

Based on 5 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

Last 24 months.

0% at estimaterobust · n=5

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
S. H. L. REFRACTORIES (U.K.) LIMITED54.2%5512 Aug 2026
Atlantas Marine Ltd32.5%0410 Feb 2023
Queen Mary University of London21.7%2225 Sept 2026
Contained Air Solutions Ltd21.7%2211 Feb 2026
Linkedin21.7%2220 May 2026
University of Surrey21.7%2215 Sept 2025
Molecular Devices (UK) Ltd21.7%224 Mar 2026
Edinburgh Innovations Limited21.7%2229 Jun 2026

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 8% of 118 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 104 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards — not a statement of preference.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of award values to single suppliers, VAT excluded, on notices from the last 24 months. Framework ceilings and repeated totals are left out.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£15mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 95 of 105 single-supplier awards; the five largest make 64%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

What one of this buyer’s contracts is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£23k middle valuerobust · n=95Middle half £15k–£91k; 3 duplicate amounts excluded from both figures (heuristic for republished framework ceilings).
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
M&E and Civil Construction Minor WorksCONCEPT BUILDING SERVICES (SOUTHERN) LTD20 Aug 20263 yrs · up to 5 yrs£3,000,000
≈ £1.0m/yr
PA0000003042 Dstl Shuttle ServiceCOLLECTIVETECH LIMITED18 Aug 20253 yrs · up to 5 yrs£2,923,222
≈ £974k/yr
Equipment Cabinets and EnclosuresSteatite Limited18 Aug 20252.9 yrs£1,649,818
≈ £566k/yr
Creative Hub - Lot 1Media Zoo Limited——£1,023,009 †
Creative Hub - Lot 1Media Zoo Limited——£770,000 †

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

A likely retender, not a certain one.

Published end dates only · 100 of 123 contracts carry one · not a retender forecast

Soonest 10 of 22 contracts ending within 18 months.

Recent procedures

Latest 50 of 138 procedures on this authority cluster, incl. beneficiary and procuring-entity roles

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
DSTL0000060729Awarded / complete16 Mar 2026—
Hire of Tractor – Rural TeamHire of agricultural machinery with operatorOpen13 Mar 2026£30,000
DSTL0000060239Awarded / complete10 Mar 2026—
Dstl000061245Awarded / complete4 Mar 2026—
Portfolio Office Integrated Tool SolutionIT services: consultingOpen27 Feb 2026£1,340,000
Inlet w/EPCAwarded / complete26 Feb 2026—
11-D SetAwarded / complete24 Feb 2026—
• Purchasing 2 second hand oscilloscopes from Keysight, which meet requirements.Awarded / complete23 Feb 2026—
Core X Flex StationAwarded / complete20 Feb 2026—
Provision of SolidWorks Training coursesPersonnel-training servicesOpen13 Feb 2026£60,000

Search all 138 procedures for this authority →

Data coverage & method
  • Source: Find a Tender OCDS releases; mixed PCR 2015 / Procurement Act 2023 history — no legal-regime label is applied.
  • Counts are procedures (one notice family), not lots. Authority cluster = canonical buyer plus beneficiary and procuring-entity roles.
  • Published procedure values exist on a minority of notices; their lifetime sum (£7.3m, ceilings stripped) is a catalogue fact, not spend, and is not shown as a headline.
  • Awards on procedures published in the last 24 months: 107 award records on 103 procedures (105 to a single canonical supplier, 2 multi-supplier). 86 values come from the contract record when the award carried none.
  • Bid counts, deadline-to-award, amendments and award-vs-estimate come from the nightly buyer analytics row; each figure’s own method and sample is behind its , the long form on Methodology.
  • Contract end dates: 100 of 123 published contracts carry a period end; 22 end within 18 months, 7 within 6.
  • Never shown: contact details, predicted winners, payment behaviour, or “who to invite”.
Identifiers consolidated into this page (11 historical Find a Tender publication identifiers)

Official notices referenced this authority under these publication identifiers. Alias URLs are not separate pages.

GB-FTS-11527GB-FTS-12087GB-FTS-157652GB-FTS-25697GB-FTS-28444GB-FTS-28447GB-FTS-36936GB-FTS-36939GB-FTS-53458GB-FTS-66851GB-FTS-9740

Canonical page id: GB-PPON-PDDM-1961-MTLN