Find a TenderPlanned procurementPlanned procurement notice
Published 7 Jul 2026, 14:52 BST

Official UK procurement notice

UK3 - Programme Frontier · UK public procurement notice

Authority: Ministry of Defence (Central government)

ServicesCompetitive flexible procedureAbove thresholdDefence & securitySME suitableAccelerated
Sectors: IT Services & Software (72) Delivery: UK
Planned pipeline value£100,000,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 17 Aug 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 7 moends 31 Mar 2027 · starts 7 Sept 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) intends to launch a series of procurements in support of Programme FRONTIER.

The Defence AI Centre (DAIC) is hosting an Industry Day on 17th July 2026 to share plans for Programme FRONTIER, a new programme to harness frontier AI for enduring warfighter advantage. FRONTIER is a multi-year commitment which will tackle a range of warfighter

problems, starting with AI tools and capabilities that reduce MOD’s cyber risk. Through this Industry Day we will be seeking to identify options in the market for innovative new products and services which can be matured into operational capability on MOD networks, at pace and within months.

The procurements are intended to deliver scalable, innovative solutions that enhance operational effectiveness, decision-making, and integration across complex environments.

The requirement is expected to align with wider Defence digital and data strategies and support delivery through modern, flexible commercial approaches.

This notice is intended to provide early visibility to the market and enable engagement ahead of the formal Tender Notice.

Supplier Invitation to Suppliers Conference

The MOD is planning to hold a face-to-face Conference for prospective Suppliers on Friday 17th July. For those not able to attend in person, a Teams link will be provided to attend virtually. To promote principles of equal treatment and transparency, this session will also be recorded and can made available to Suppliers who request it.

The conference will include a brief introduction from the Programme Team and a run through of the process from the Commercial Team. The intention of this session is three-fold, namely: (1) to explain how Suppliers, especially Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs), can get involved in this opportunity, (2) to promote a common understanding of the Programme’s goals, and (3) to set the behaviours that MOD and Suppliers can expect from each other.

The team will introduce the breadth of FRONTIER, which covers applications of frontier AI across every part of Defence. One of the early focus areas is cyber security, and so through this work we want to understand options in the market for AI tools and capabilities that can help reduce MOD’s cyber defence risk and threat of attack. We are seeking options which we can deploy within our Security Operating Centres (SOCs) that monitor and protect MOD networks.

We are interested in understanding products and services which are either already mature, or could be matured very quickly to an enterprise-grade capability. We are looking for opportunities to deploy tools directly into the SOC within months, that are ready to use by our cyber defence operators, that would even be used as part of a trial deployment providing tangible value and a measurable reduction to MOD’s cyber risk.

We are not looking for proposals to develop new capabilities, or offers to provide evaluation of alternatives. We also are not looking for demos or proofs of concept that run on representative systems. However, solutions that can run on live MOD data piped into a separate sandbox environment will be considered for particularly high impact capabilities that require a greater level of integration where it makes sense to prove in a sandbox first.

Commercial Procedure

Should your organisation wish to attend please complete the form, so that the MOD may contact you to confirm your attendance (Link here: www.techuk.org/what-we-deliver/even… ↗).

Total Programme Value (estimated)

~£100,000,000

Value of initial suite of Contracts (estimated)

~£8,000,000

Contract dates (estimated)

TBC

Delivery Model

The MOD is considering a multi-supplier approach, potentially strucured to encourage:

  • Participation from Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
  • Collaborative delivery across multiple suppliers
  • Flexible and iterative development models

Further detail on the delivery construct will be confirmed in the Tender Notice.

Commercial Approach

The procurement for Programme FRONTIER is expected to be conducted in accordance with the Procurement Act 2023, utilising a structured and transparent competitive process.

The Contracting route for the initial phase of Programme FRONTIER will be via the Government Commercial Agency (GCA)l Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for Artificial Intelligence. Any suppliers interested in engaging with Programme FRONTIER must also be registered as a supplier on the GCA DPS for Artificial Intelligence.

The MOD anticipates adopting a competitive flexible procedure, likely comprising the following stages:

  • Stage 1 – Condition of Participation (COP):

Suppliers will be required to submit a response demonstrating compliance with mandatory criteria and outlining their technical capability, experience, and organisational suitability. This stage may include both pass/fail and scored elements and will be used to down-select suppliers to the next phase.

  • Stage 2 – Invitation to Tender (ITT):

Shortlisted suppliers will be invited to submit detailed proposals, including technical, commercial, and social value responses. This stage may include written submissions, presentations and/or demonstrations and will be evaluated against defined award criteria.

  • Contract Award:

Suppliers achieving the most advantageous tenders will be awarded a contract and will be required to enter into the relevant terms and conditions.

Illustrative Evaluation Considerations

We are open to testing criteria with suppliers before finalising however proposals are likely to be assessed across a combination of:

  • Cyber Risk Reduction: Bidders must demonstrate how their proposed solution will deliver a measurable and tangible reduction in MOD cyber risk. Solutions focused solely on improving risk visibility, monitoring, or understanding without demonstrable risk reduction will receive lower scores.
  • Operational Maturity and Deployability: Preference will be given to solutions that are sufficiently mature and ready for deployment within an operational Security Operations Centre (SOC) environment. Bidders should evidence integration readiness, compatibility with existing systems and data sources, and assurance that deployment will not adversely impact current operations.
  • Understanding of Defence and National Security Environments: Whilst prior MOD experience is not mandatory, bidders should demonstrate an understanding of the challenges associated with operating within defence or national security environments. Credit will be given where bidders show awareness of MOD capability adoption processes and relevant operational constraints.
  • Security and Hosting Arrangements: Solutions must satisfy MOD security requirements and clearly articulate security controls and data handling arrangements. UK-hosted services are preferred, particularly where cloud-hosted solutions are proposed.
  • Whole-Life Cost and Commercial Sustainability: Evaluation will consider both initial trial costs and longer-term operational costs. Bidders should provide transparent pricing models and demonstrate that future service continuation costs represent fair and sustainable value for money.
  • Sovereignty and Control: Preference may be given to solutions that support UK sovereignty objectives. Solutions reliant upon external services, particularly those hosted or controlled outside the UK, may receive lower scores. Where external dependencies exist, bidders should provide a clear roadmap towards sovereign control or operation.

What Good Looks Like: A mature, secure, operationally deployable AI solution that delivers demonstrable cyber risk reduction, offers clear long-term value for money, and supports UK sovereignty objectives. We are not looking for traditional cyber security products for this

programme.

Key Principles

The MOD intends to ensure that the procurement process is:

  • Transparent and fair, providing equal opportunity to all suppliers
  • Accessible to SMEs and non-traditional defence suppliers
  • Collaborative, encouraging partnership and ecosystem delivery models
  • Flexible, enabling adaptation to evolving requirements and emerging technologies

Additional information

This Planned Procurement Notice (PPN) is not a call for competition and any information provided is for transparency only and, as such, may be subject to change. The Tender Notice and associated Tender Documents are anticipated to be made available in the coming weeks.

If a Supplier has difficulty accessing the form, please contact the MOD on the email address below. Please note that outside of the form and any access issues, no further correspondence is welcome at this time.

  • How the procedure runs: GCA DPS AI

CPV: IT software development services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1Planned 7 moSMEPublished value£100,000,000
Contract period: 7 Sept 2026 – 31 Mar 2027 (7 mo)Value: £100,000,000 exc. VAT · £120,000,000 inc. VAT
Delivery: UKEligibility: SME eligible
Pre-qualification & selection criteria (PQQ)1
  • Condition of participation

    Downselect will take place in accordance with GCA DPS principles.

    shortlisting

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add more
Conditions of participation1
  • Condition of participation

    Downselect will take place in accordance with GCA DPS principles.

    shortlisting

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Ministry of Defence buys Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221), and who usually turns up

Ministry of Defence’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerMinistry of Defence · division 72
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 33 of 118 known-size awards · market: CPV 7221 · UK-wide, n=368
28%39%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 9 of 24 known-location awards · market: CPV 7221 · UK-wide, n=222
38%36%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 6 decided notices · market: CPV 7221 · UK-wide, n=61
41 days49 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 41 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 94 of 150 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 7221 · UK-wide, n=569
63%65%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer30 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 72
63% had one bid
The market81 lots with bid counts · CPV 7221 · UK-wide
4% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid63% / 4%
Buyer: 19 of 30 lots with published bid counts. Market: 3 of 81 lots with published bid counts.
2–327% / 33%
Buyer: 8 of 30 lots with published bid counts. Market: 27 of 81 lots with published bid counts.
4–610% / 33%
Buyer: 3 of 30 lots with published bid counts. Market: 27 of 81 lots with published bid counts.
7+0% / 30%
Buyer: 0 of 30 lots with published bid counts. Market: 24 of 81 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer91 lots with estimate and award · all categories
60% below estimate
The market57 lots with estimate and award · CPV 7221 · UK-wide
47% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate60% / 47%
Buyer: 55 of 91 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 27 of 57 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%22% / 33%
Buyer: 20 of 91 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 19 of 57 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate18% / 19%
Buyer: 16 of 91 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 11 of 57 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 72217 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£100m
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 81 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet4% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 81 similar lots
1 bid4%
3 of 81 similar past lots received 1 bid (4%).
2–333%
27 of 81 similar past lots received 2–3 (33%).
4–633%
27 of 81 similar past lots received 4–6 (33%).
7+30%
24 of 81 similar past lots received 7+ (30%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £100m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Restricted route (Stage 2 ITT / Shortlist): Bidding is restricted to invited candidates who qualified at Stage 1. Uninvited suppliers cannot participate in this round.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Competitive flexible procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Defence & security
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
7 Jul 2026, 14:52 BST
Last source update
7 Jul 2026, 14:52 BST
Award evaluation window
Submission end – 4 Sept 2026
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-063721
Accelerated
Qualifying planned procurement notice
Latest notice
Planned procurement notice (UK3)
Classification (CPV)
IT software development services
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06c561 Find a Tender
How it runs

GCA DPS AI

How it was run

Official notice
Requests to participate (first stage)
31 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
Submission deadline
31 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
Electronic submission
Allowed
Accepted languages
en

Timeline

7 Jul 2026 → 7 Sept 2026 · 5 dates
  1. Planning notice published110 days ago
    7 Jul 2026, 14:52 BST
  2. Tender notice expected68 days ago
    17 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
  3. Submission deadline54 days ago
    31 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
  4. Award decision expected by50 days ago
    4 Sept 2026, 23:59 BST
  5. Contract starts48 days ago
    7 Sept 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Planned procurement notice published
    7 Jul 2026, 14:52 BST
    UK3

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Ministry of Defence

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PHVX-4316-ZVGZ MOD Corsham, Building 405, B2, Westwells Road,, Corsham, South West, SN13 9NRContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure