Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 25 Nov 2025, 11:43 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Procurement, Implementation, Training, Maintenance and Ongoing Support of a Dental Practice Management System

Authority: University of Portsmouth Higher Education Corporation (Education)

ServicesBelow thresholdSME suitable
Sectors: IT Services & Software (72) Delivery: UK
Planned pipeline value£150,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 yrsends 30 Apr 2029 · up to 29 Apr 2030 with extensions · starts 1 May 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The University of Portsmouth School of Dental, Health and Care Professions (SDHCP) champions excellence and innovation in higher education learning, teaching, research and the delivery of primary care dentistry.

Our undergraduate Dentists and Dental Care Professionals treat patients across two clinics of 44 treatment bays for 40 weeks of the year, as well as undertaking simulated training in the clinical simulation laboratory.

The University has ambitions to further develop the school to become a Dental School taking on new Dentistry students from September 2026.

As part of this development, the University of Portsmouth is currently exploring options for the potential procurement of a Dental Practice Management System (DPMS) to support clinical and educational delivery.

This Preliminary Market Engagement (PME) is an exploratory exercise and does not form part of a formal procurement procedure. Participation in this PME does not create any obligation on the part of the University to initiate or proceed with a procurement process. Furthermore, a decision not to participate in this exercise will not preclude any supplier from being considered in future tendering opportunities.

The primary objective is to gain a deeper understanding of the market landscape, including available solutions and their functionality, industry best practices, indicative pricing models, and innovative approaches.

As part of this engagement, we would appreciate if you could share comprehensive information about your solution, including its features, capabilities and any relevant case studies or implementation examples.

CPV: IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 3 yrsSME
Contract period: 1 May 2026 – 30 Apr 2029 (3 yrs) · up to 29 Apr 2030 with extensions
Delivery: UKEligibility: SME eligible
Extensions: Extension options published

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How University of Portsmouth Higher Education Corporation buys IT services: consulting, software, internet (CPV 72), and who usually turns up

University of Portsmouth Higher Education Corporation’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: IT services: consulting, software, internet (CPV 72) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bidWhat to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 1 of 4 known-size awards · market: division 72 · UK-wide, n=3,430
1 of 437%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 3 of 4 known-location awards · market: division 72 · UK-wide, n=2,635
3 of 436%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: division 72 · UK-wide, n=397
—50 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 50 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 7 of 11 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 72 · UK-wide, n=5,272
64%63%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer9 lots with bid counts · all categories
44% had one bid
The market789 lots with bid counts · division 72 · UK-wide
12% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid44% / 12%
Buyer: 4 of 9 lots with published bid counts. Market: 97 of 789 lots with published bid counts.
2–311% / 28%
Buyer: 1 of 9 lots with published bid counts. Market: 218 of 789 lots with published bid counts.
4–633% / 28%
Buyer: 3 of 9 lots with published bid counts. Market: 223 of 789 lots with published bid counts.
7+11% / 32%
Buyer: 1 of 9 lots with published bid counts. Market: 251 of 789 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer6 lots with estimate and award · all categories
17% below estimate
The market530 lots with estimate and award · division 72 · UK-wide
46% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate17% / 46%
Buyer: 1 of 6 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 244 of 530 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%50% / 38%
Buyer: 3 of 6 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 199 of 530 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate33% / 16%
Buyer: 2 of 6 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 87 of 530 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 7236 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£150k

This lot lists more than one class in CPV 72. The comparison uses that group.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 789 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet12% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 789 similar lots
1 bid12%
97 of 789 similar past lots received 1 bid (12%).
2–328%
218 of 789 similar past lots received 2–3 (28%).
4–628%
223 of 789 similar past lots received 4–6 (28%).
7+32%
251 of 789 similar past lots received 7+ (32%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £150k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
25 Nov 2025, 11:43 GMT
Last source update
25 Nov 2025, 11:43 GMT
Authority reference
24-335
FTS notice number
2025/S 000-076793
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-05e82a Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

25 Nov 2025 → 1 May 2026 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published336 days ago
    25 Nov 2025, 11:43 GMT
  2. Market engagement318 days ago
    12 Dec 2025, 23:59 GMT

    PME Released 25th November 2025

    Deadline for Questions 10st December 2025

    Responses Due 12th December 2025

    Demonstration Opportunity 5th January 2026 - 16th January 2026

  3. Contract starts180 days ago
    1 May 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    25 Nov 2025, 11:43 GMT
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

University of Portsmouth Higher Education Corporation

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PWYV-2655-NPMQ University House, Portsmouth, South East, PO1 2UPContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure