Official UK procurement notice
Pj HARMOS (AI Tooling for a Health Assessment and Risk Management Operational System)
Authority: Ministry of Defence (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionProject HARMOS (Health Assessment and Risk Management Operational System) will deliver an Agentic AI‑assisted software platform that optimises production of operational medical plans and Healthcare Risk Assessments (HRAs). The initial activity is a 3 – 4 month pilot/MVP on MODCloud for ~50 med and non‑med planners, delivering validated first‑pass med plans and HRAs, demonstrable evidence of data lineage, measurable time savings for CMAs (OF3–OF5) and a pathway to scale/transition to DMS Digital. Suppliers should be prepared to build their solution on the Rapid Development and Innovation Platform (RDIP) which is an accredited AWS-based solution available via MODNET. RDIP offers platform, software, and expertise as a service with the aim of accelerating innovation projects and simplifying accreditation processes.
The Joint Hub for Innovation (jHub) will be the project owners for HARMOS. jHub wishes to enhance the speed and efficiency of Medical Planning through the use of AI-supported tooling. The primary objectives include:
- To reduce the time required for generating draft medical operations plans from the current 5 days to approximately 30 minutes for a first pass.
- To improve the accuracy of medical risk assessments by leaning on a repository of Post Exercise Reports (PXRs), historical event data, and prior art.
- To facilitate effective knowledge transfer between deployments, ensuring lessons learned are incorporated into future deployment planning.
Through achieving these objectives, jHub will be better positioned to further support the welfare of the military personnel being deployed.
The intention of the Pilot / MVP will be to deliver an AI-supported tool that can produce the first draft of a Medical Operations plan, using historical data, priorart (existing technologies, methods or systems that have been developed prior to the creation of new military innovation), and open source data. The solution will allow jHub to specify a location, number of personnel, and the type of activities being completed during deployment, and receive an automated draft Medical Operations Plan with perspectives specific to different roles, with potential risks highlighted. The system will maintain a searchable repository of previous deployments and provide real-time monitoring capabilities through visual dashboards. The output from this tool can then be reviewed, improved, and shared rapidly with colleagues across the UK MOD using a widely understood language.
Route to Market:
Artificial Intelligence Dynamic Purchase System - ref. RM6200
supplierregistration.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/dps/RM6200 ↗
The intended route to market will be RM6200 referenced above. Please note this is subject to change should a more suitable route be identified. If you are interested in this project, we would encourage you to register on the AI DPS ahead of our intended competition timelines.
The categories for filter are not yet defined but will be aligned to the requirement outlined above.
Timelines:
The intention is to release this project to competition via RM6200 late January/February 2026. Timelines are subject to change.
CPV: Software consultancy services · Software programming and consultancy services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Ministry of Defence buys Software-related services (CPV 7226), and who usually turns up
Ministry of Defence’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Software-related services (CPV 7226) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 41 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid63% / 27%
2–327% / 31%
4–610% / 20%
7+0% / 22%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate60% / 57%
Within ±2%22% / 23%
Above estimate18% / 19%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1See aboveCPV 7226Published estimate£700k
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 74 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid27%
2–331%
4–620%
7+22%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 12 Dec 2025, 18:25 GMT
- Last source update
- 12 Dec 2025, 18:25 GMT
- FTS notice number
2025/S 000-082699- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-05f541Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
12 Dec 2025 → 12 Dec 2025 · 2 dates- Tender notice expected321 days ago12 Dec 2025
- Notice published320 days ago12 Dec 2025, 18:25 GMT
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.