Official UK procurement notice
Parent Infant Psychological Therapy Services
Authority: West Sussex County Council (Local council)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionSpecialist parent-infant psychological therapy service for expectant parents and parents with children aged 0-2 years living in West Sussex.
CPV: Health services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1This is a Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Intended Approach NoticePlanned
This is a Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Intended Approach Notice. This notice is subject to Regulation 10 of the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023.<br/><br/>For the avoidance of doubt, this is not a procurement via Procurement Act 23 or Public Contract Regulations 2015.<br/><br/>West Sussex County Council is releasing this Intended Approach Notice as per the Provider Selection Regime (PSR) using the Most Suitable Provider route. As per schedule 5 under Regulation 10 of the PSR, please see the following information below:<br/><br/>1. WSCC is intending to follow the Most Suitable Provider Process to award a contract.<br/><br/>2. The contract title: Parent Infant Psychological Therapy Service. The contract reference: I-89168.<br/><br/>3. The aim is to procure a Specialist parent-infant psychological therapy service for expectant parents and parents with children aged 0-2 years living in West Sussex. Due to the specialist nature of the service, all practitioners delivering therapeutic interventions must hold appropriate professional qualifications and, where applicable, maintain registration with a relevant professional or regulatory body. They should also be experienced in delivering specialist parent-infant psychological therapy in both group and one-to-one settings. <br/><br/>4. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intended approach notice under the PSR.<br/><br/>5. Should you wish to be considered, written representations should be sent to [email protected] ensuring the following details are referenced:<br/><br/>Project reference: I-89168<br/><br/>Project title: Parent Infant Psychological Therapy Service - Most Suitable Provider process<br/><br/>This PSR MSP Intended Approach Notice will be published on 27 October 2026 and will be open to representations until 12pm, 10 November 2026. Additional information: This PSR MSP Intended Approach Notice will be published on 27 October2026 and will be open until 12pm, 10 November 2026.<br/><br/>This notice is published by West Sussex County Council pursuant to Regulation 10 of the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023 as notice of its intention to follow the Most Suitable Provider (MSP) process.<br/><br/>The requirement concerns the procurement of Parent Infant Psychological Therapy Services. The proposed contract term is 1 December 2026 to 30 November 2027. The total contract value is £20,000.<br/><br/>West Sussex County Council considers the MSP process appropriate because Direct Award Processes A, B and C do not apply.<br/><br/>The likely provider who has been identified by WSCC has committed £5,000 from their own charitable resources to this project and has worked with a local nursery provider to secure an additional £5,000 of resource should they be awarded this provision. This notice is being published for at least 14 calendar days before assessment of providers against the key criteria. Any provider not presently known to West Sussex County Council that believes it is capable of delivering these services may ask to be considered as a potential provider.<br/><br/>In accordance with the Provider Selection Regime, West Sussex County Council will assess likely providers against the five mandatory key criteria and the basic selection criteria.<br/><br/>The key criteria to be applied in order of importance to this procurement are:<br/><br/>1. Quality and innovation <br/>2. Integration, collaboration and service sustainability<br/>3. Value<br/>4. Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating choice<br/>5. Social value<br/><br/>The basic selection criteria will be applied on a pass/fail basis and will include:<br/><br/>- suitability to pursue the activity, including relevant regulatory and accreditation requirements;<br/>- economic and financial standing, where relevant; and<br/>- technical and professional ability.
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How West Sussex County Council buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up
West Sussex County Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in South East England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 87 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid13% / 16%
2–350% / 28%
4–625% / 35%
7+13% / 21%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate50% / 29%
Within ±2%43% / 66%
Above estimate7% / 5%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1This is a Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Intended Approach NoticeCPV 8510Published estimate£20k
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 68 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid16%
2–328%
4–635%
7+21%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record · publisher note attached- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 27 Oct 2026, 13:06 GMT
- Last source update
- 27 Oct 2026, 13:06 GMT
- Authority reference
I-89168- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-101542- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-079135Find a Tender
Publisher note: This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Intended Approach Notice.<br/><br/>The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023.<br/><br/>For avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 or the Procurement Act 2023 do not apply to this award. It is the intention to award a contract using the Most Suitable Provider process (MSP).
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
27 Oct 2026 → 1 Dec 2026 · 2 dates- Notice published16h ago27 Oct 2026, 13:06 GMT
- Today28 Oct 2026
- Tender notice expectedin 33 days1 Dec 2026
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.