Find a TenderDirect award proposedPipeline notice
Published 11 Jan 2026, 22:01 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Oracle Cloud · UK public procurement notice

Authority: Cornwall Council (Local council)

GoodsDirect awardAbove threshold
Planned pipeline value£6,100,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Award expected 1 Feb 2027direct award proposed, no call for competition
Contract term 5 yrsends 30 Nov 2032 · up to 30 Nov 2037 with extensions · starts 1 Dec 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

For the provision of Oracle Cloud Fusion licences.

Expected to be direct awarded via Lot 1: Enterprise Software of the Crown Commercial Services (CCS) Back Office Software 2 Framework (RM6285)

CPV: Software package and information systems

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 5 yrs
Contract period: 1 Dec 2027 – 30 Nov 2032 (5 yrs) · up to 30 Nov 2037 with extensions
Delivery: South West
Extensions: Extension options published

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Cornwall Council buys Software package and information systems (CPV 48), and who usually turns up

Cornwall Council’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Software package and information systems (CPV 48) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerCornwall Council · all categories
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 151 of 192 known-size awards · market: division 48 · South West England, n=329
79%32%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in South West England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 224 of 266 known-location awards · market: division 48 · South West England, n=403
84%10%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in South West England.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 16 decided notices · market: division 48 · South West England, n=16
39 days46 days

Half of these awards were announced within 39 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 35 of 98 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 48 · South West England, n=524
36%71%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer59 lots with bid counts · all categories
12% had one bid
The market26 lots with bid counts · division 48 · South West England
23% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid12% / 23%
Buyer: 7 of 59 lots with published bid counts. Market: 6 of 26 lots with published bid counts.
2–346% / 23%
Buyer: 27 of 59 lots with published bid counts. Market: 6 of 26 lots with published bid counts.
4–615% / 42%
Buyer: 9 of 59 lots with published bid counts. Market: 11 of 26 lots with published bid counts.
7+27% / 12%
Buyer: 16 of 59 lots with published bid counts. Market: 3 of 26 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer44 lots with estimate and award · all categories
18% below estimate
The market19 lots with estimate and award · division 48 · South West England
68% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate18% / 68%
Buyer: 8 of 44 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 13 of 19 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%64% / 32%
Buyer: 28 of 44 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 6 of 19 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate18% / 0%
Buyer: 8 of 44 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 0 of 19 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #160 monthsPublished estimate£6.1m
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 26 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet23% single-bid risk
Past bids on 26 similar lots
1 bid23%
6 of 26 similar past lots received 1 bid (23%).
2–323%
6 of 26 similar past lots received 2–3 (23%).
4–642%
11 of 26 similar past lots received 4–6 (42%).
7+12%
3 of 26 similar past lots received 7+ (12%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £6.1m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Direct award
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Direct award proposed
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Direct award (no call for competition)
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
11 Jan 2026, 22:01 GMT
Last source update
27 May 2026, 15:47 BST
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-049848
Latest notice
Pipeline notice (UK1)
Classification (CPV)
Software package and information systems
Delivery area
South West (UKK3)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-060353 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

11 Jan 2026 → 1 Dec 2027 · 5 dates
  1. Planning notice published282 days ago
    11 Jan 2026, 22:01 GMT
  2. Market engagement258 days ago
    4 Feb 2026, 23:59 GMT

    ROUTE TO MARKET

    Cornwall Council currently procure their Oracle Fusion platform direct from Oracle. The contract ends in November 2027, so we are coming to the market to ensure we have a continued licensing agreement to allow us to seamlessly continue supporting the business needs of the Council after that date.

    Cornwall Council has not yet determined its preferred procurement route. Preliminary market engagement is being used to help inform this decision. At this stage, the Council is not committed to either a competitive tender process or a direct award. All transparency notices, and any tender notices where applicable, will be published on the Central Digital Platform via the Find a Tender Service.

    RFI QUESTIONS AND INDICATIVE PRICING

    1. Please provide an estimated cost for the ongoing annual licencing of the Oracle software and any related services.
    2. Please confirm that you can provide the required modules of Oracle Fusion as detailed within the RFI.
    3. Please detail your service level agreement and provide an example copy as part of your response.
    4. Please explain what flexibility you can provide on licensing volumes and types within the length of the contact.
    5. Please confirm what additional capabilities you can provide around software asset management above those already provided by Oracle.
    6. What level of service do you provide around product roadmap visibility and client specific adoption.
    7. What support do you provide towards support and maintenance, adopting and testing of existing and new modules.
    8. If the Council chooses to run a competitive tender, which route to market would you advise we take (Framework, DPS, CDP, etc.)

    Please email [email protected] for a PDF file that provides the licence volumes to be used for providing indicative pricing.

  3. Latest notice published147 days ago
    27 May 2026, 15:47 BST
  4. Today
    21 Oct 2026
  5. Tender notice expectedin 104 days
    1 Feb 2027, 23:59 GMT
  6. Contract starts
    1 Dec 2027

Notice history

4 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 11 Jan 2026
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    11 Jan 2026, 22:01 GMT
    UK2
  2. Pipeline notice published
    27 May 2026, 15:47 BST
    UK1
  3. Status changed to planned
    27 May 2026, 15:47 BST
  4. Procurement method changed
    27 May 2026, 15:47 BST

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Cornwall Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PYRH-9827-DWLP County Hall, Truro, South West, TR1 3AYContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (2)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure