Official UK procurement notice
Integrated Core Systems (ICS)
Authority: North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust (Central government)·Consortium: 2 public authorities
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionNorth West Ambulance Service NHS Trust (the Trust) is undertaking a second stage of preliminary market engagement for its proposed Integrated Core Systems procurement. The requirement is intended to provide Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) capability across 999, NHS 111 and Non-Emergency Patient Transport Services, together with Electronic Patient Record (EPR) capability for frontline and remote clinicians.
The Trust’s current preference is to procure a combined solution covering both CAD and EPR through a single contractual delivery model. However, no decision has been made regarding the final procurement structure and the Trust is seeking feedback through this engagement to inform that decision. This could be delivered by one supplier providing the full solution, or by a prime contractor taking overall responsibility while working with one or more delivery partners to provide the other element. The Trust is using this engagement to test whether the market can support that preferred outcome with sufficient competition, affordability, deliverability and clear end-to-end accountability.
The Trust has not made a final decision on whether the procurement will be presented as one combined requirement or divided into separate EPR and CAD lots. Separate lots remain a potential alternative if the engagement indicates that a combined approach would materially restrict competition, create affordability concerns or reduce the Trust’s ability to proceed with part of the requirement should its circumstances change. Any future lotting, packaging and award approach will be confirmed in the tender documents.
Purpose of Stage 2 preliminary market engagement
- Establish which suppliers can deliver the complete combined CAD and EPR requirement, either independently or through a prime contractor, consortium, subcontracting or other partnership model and understand market interest in separate EPR and CAD opportunities if the Trust decides not to procure the requirement as one combined package.
- Obtain feedback on the proposed competitive flexible procedure, timetable, demonstrations, potential dialogue and negotiation activities and other aspects of procurement design.
- Support specification development and assess market readiness through discussion of themes and challenges arising from current system use. These discussions will take place through 1:1 supplier meetings.
Potential delivery and procurement models
The Trust wishes to test the following indicative models. They are not ranked tender options and do not represent a final lotting decision:
- Combined solution from one supplier
Description: One supplier provides both CAD and EPR under one contract.
Purpose of market testing: Test whole-solution capability, competition and affordability.
- Combined solution led by a prime contractor
Description: A prime contractor provides one or both elements and takes contractual responsibility for partners or subcontractors delivering the remaining capability.
Purpose of market testing: Test appetite for partnership delivery, integration and end-to-end accountability.
- Separate EPR and CAD contracts or lots
Description: EPR and CAD are procured separately with defined interoperability and shared delivery obligations.
Purpose of market testing: Test fallback competition and interest if a combined approach is not adopted or cannot proceed.
NHS Pathways
NHS Pathways is integral to the Trust’s current operational model and is used as its primary telephone triage system. The Trust’s current intention is that any CAD element, whether delivered within a combined solution or through a separate CAD arrangement, will be required to support the use of and integration with NHS Pathways. The Trust is considering NHS Pathways compatibility as a mandatory requirement. The final requirement and assessment method will be confirmed in the procurement documents.
Information requested from the market
- Whether the supplier can provide the complete combined CAD and EPR solution itself.
- If not, whether the supplier could deliver a combined solution as a prime contractor or by working with another provider, and which element it would provide.
- Any barriers preventing or discouraging the supplier from forming such an arrangement.
- If the requirement is divided, whether the supplier would be interested in an EPR opportunity, a CAD opportunity, or both.
- Feedback on competition, affordability, deliverability and the proposed competitive flexible procedure.
All indications are preliminary and non-binding. The Trust will not require suppliers to have formed a partnership during PME and gives no assurance that organisations taking part in the engagement will be selected, shortlisted or contracted.
CPV: Software package and information systems
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1PlannedRenewal
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust buys Software package and information systems (CPV 48), and who usually turns up
North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Software package and information systems (CPV 48) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in North West England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in North West England.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 29 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid43% / 12%
2–343% / 21%
4–614% / 31%
7+0% / 36%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate52%
Within ±2%29%
Above estimate19%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1Published estimate£19m
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 67 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid12%
2–321%
4–631%
7+36%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Competitive flexible procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Goods
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 3 Sept 2026, 14:26 BST
- Last source update
- 14 Oct 2026, 13:13 BST
- Authority reference
NWAS-TR-16-26- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-097002- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06f165Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
3 Sept 2026 → 1 Jan 2028 · 5 dates- Planning notice published48 days ago3 Sept 2026, 14:26 BST
- Latest notice published7 days ago14 Oct 2026, 13:13 BST
- Today21 Oct 2026
- Market engagementin 17 days6 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
Stage 2 will comprise an open notice, a supplier questionnaire, a presentation and structured one-to-one discussions. The questionnaire will be used to test the preferred combined-solution outcome and alternative delivery models, identify practical partnering barriers and assess fallback interest in separate EPR and CAD opportunities. The presentation and discussions will address current-system themes and challenges, scenario discussions, market capability, specification development and market readiness.
- Suppliers that have already expressed an interest will be invited automatically.
- New suppliers may express an interest as per the instructions in this notice.
- One-to-one appointments will be allocated on a first come, first served basis from the available slots.
Engagement Timetable
- Issue stage 2 PME notice and questionnaire
Open stage 2 PME, invite new expressions of interest and seek structured market feedback.
Wednesday 14 October 2026
- Open bookings for one-to-one discussions
Offer appointments on a first come, first served basis.
Wednesday 14 October to Monday 6 November 2026
- Supplier presentation and issue discussion materials
Explain the preferred combined-solution outcome, possible delivery models, alternative lotting and current-system themes.
Tuesday 27 October 2026
- Deadline for new expressions of interest
Final date for new suppliers to register. Existing EOI suppliers do not need to register again.
Friday 6 November 2026
- One-to-one supplier discussions
Explore combined delivery capability, partnering barriers, market facilitation, fallback interest and wider requirement themes.
3 Days from Tuesday 10 to Thursday 12 November 2026
- Questionnaire response deadline
Close the written feedback exercise.
Friday 13 November 2026
- Formal close of market engagement
Conclude the engagement and analyse findings to inform procurement design.
Monday 16 November 2026
Important engagement conditions
- All dates are indicative and may change. Any change will be communicated to registered participants.
- Participation is optional. This is not a call for competition, and participation or non-participation will not confer an advantage or disadvantage in any future procurement.
- The engagement does not commit the Trust to commence a procurement, use a particular delivery or lotting model, or award any contract.
- The Trust will take appropriate steps to ensure that participation in this engagement does not confer an unfair advantage in any subsequent procurement. Where appropriate, information obtained through the engagement may be shared with interested suppliers through future procurement documentation, clarifications or other communications.
- Information obtained during this engagement may be used by the Trust to inform the development of its requirements, procurement strategy, specification, contract structure, evaluation methodology and procurement documents.
- The Trust reserves the right to take appropriate measures to address any actual or perceived conflict of interest or distortion of competition arising from participation in this engagement.
- The Trust may record or minute supplier sessions for internal analysis. The approach and any consent requirements will be confirmed before each session.
- Suppliers should identify information they consider commercially confidential. The Trust will take reasonable steps to protect information identified as commercially confidential but may disclose information where required by law.
- Suppliers will bear their own costs of participation and should not submit a tender or detailed sales proposal unless specifically requested.
Please contact [email protected] by Friday 6 November 2026 to express an interest. Suppliers that have already expressed an interest do not need to register again and will be invited automatically.
- Tender notice expectedin 104 days1 Feb 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Contract starts1 Jan 2028
Notice history
4 events · 3 releases on Find a Tender · since 3 Sept 2026- Pipeline notice published3 Sept 2026, 14:26 BSTUK1
- Pipeline notice published3 Sept 2026, 14:47 BSTUK1
- Preliminary market engagement notice published14 Oct 2026, 13:13 BSTUK2
- Buyer details updated14 Oct 2026, 13:13 BST
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
2 public bodies on the noticeOfficial documents & specifications (3)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender
- Pipeline notice Pipeline notice on Find a Tender
- Pipeline notice Pipeline notice on Find a Tender