Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 23 Oct 2026, 17:17 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Innovation Exchange Challenge: DfE + Innovate UK Pre-demolition Data Capture and Analysis

Authority: Department for Education (Central government)·On behalf of: UK Research and Innovation

ServicesBelow thresholdSME suitableVCSE suitable
Sectors: Construction & Civil Engineering (45)Architecture & Engineering (71) Delivery: Delivery location not published
Planned pipeline value£100,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 1 yrends 31 Mar 2028 · starts 1 Apr 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The education estate comprises approximately 69,000 buildings across more than 22,000 schools and colleges in England. It includes a range of construction types and structural components, many of which are concealed while buildings are in use.

DfE continuously seeks to improve its understanding of construction materials and structural arrangements used in school and college buildings. This is essential as these buildings age, have increasing maintenance requirements and will be impacted by climate change. DfE uses this knowledge to prioritise investment in the estate, inform policy and project-specific decisions,and ensure interventions such as retrofit, renewal or rebuilding are appropriately targeted. It also supports the review and development of reliable and proportionate guidance for those responsible for operating educational buildings.

Buildings due for demolition through the Schools Rebuilding Programme (SRP) offer a rich source of informationas they are typically included in the programme because of safety issues or severe condition need, including structural defects. Immediately prior to demolition, finishes and fixtures are often removed as part of the ‘softstrip’, exposing large areas of the load bearing structure that would normally remain concealed in an operational school because of the disruption of intrusive investigations. At present there is no systematic programme to capture and analyse information on the final structural condition of these buildings.

This challenge seeks to establish a way to do this with minimal impact to the cost and programme of project delivery.

Further information on the School Rebuilding Programme (SRP) can be found here: www.gov.uk/government/publicati… ↗

The Challenge

Through Innovate UK, DfE are seeking scalable and cost-effective digital tools and methodologies to capture structural condition data immediately before demolition and analyse it to identify trends in defects across different construction types and structural arrangements in the education estate. This may be answered as discrete or a complete solution: 1: Data capturing and interpretation and 2: Analysis to identify trends across different construction types and structural arrangements.

Applicants shall demonstrate how their proposals can capture structural condition data during a short pre-demolition window and analyse it to give reliable, engineering-based insights into structural defects, deterioration patterns and structural risks.

Challenge responses should explain how data will be captured efficiently and safely and how technologies or automated methodologies, will be used to interpret it and then analyse it to inform the overall structural condition. Successful data capture and interpretation will be able to identify the different deterioration that can occur for the various structural elements and materials used for historic school construction. Successful analysis approaches should be capable of identifying common patterns or trends in visible defects and signs of deterioration across different buildings and correlate these to the construction materials and structural systems present. Responses should also explain the interoperability between data capture and analysis tools and how data and analysis outputs can be ingested into DfE’s Common Data Environment (CDE).

The typical range of material systems used for structural elements is:

  • Structural steel (welded, bolted, rivetted)
  • Structural timber, including trusses
  • Reinforced concrete (Excluding RAAC, reinforced aerated autoclaved concrete, which will have been captured by separate pre-assessment)
  • Masonry (brickwork and blockwork), solid or cavity with wall ties.

The range of structural elements is expected to include but may not be limited to:

  • Ground slabs: Reinforced concrete
  • Columns and beams and stabilising elements (braces): Steel, Reinforced concrete, masonry, timber
  • Roof Framing (trusses and lattices): Steel, timber
  • Suspended floors and flat roofs: Reinforced concrete, beams and decking (such as floor boards), reinforced concrete beam, concrete block infill, precast concrete and proprietary panels
  • Loadbearing walls: Masonry
  • Chimneys: masonry, reinforced concrete

It is expected that some degradation types will be common to all materials:

  • Water ingress effects, settling/movement of foundations or supports, movement from the as-built condition, workmanship issues from the time of construction.
  • Unplanned structural alterations or mechanical damage through the building’s life such as cutting of members, removal of braces, removal of bolts, accidental impact etc

The typical deterioration of the differing materials can include:

  • Timber: Wood boring insects, dry rot, wet rot, crushing, splitting, warping
  • Steelwork: Corrosion, compression buckling, buckling over supports
  • Reinforced concrete: Corrosion of rebar, spalling of surfaces, cracking, crumbling, contamination
  • Masonry: Crumbling and spalling of faces, corrosion of cavity wall ties, cracking in bedding joints, cracking in bricks/blocks, erosion of mortar bedding joints

Timescales

Launch of the Challenge Statement: Friday 23rd October 2026

Deadline for respondents: Friday 4th December 2026

Shortlisted applicants will be notified: Tuesday 5th January 2027

Challenge pitch day for shortlisted applicants: 11th to 15th January 2027

Shortlisted applicants notified of the pitch result: Tuesday 2nd February 2027

Subject to DfE commercial procurement processes and budget availability, successful applicant(s) may be invited to pilot their solution(s) in live SRP settings. Adoption of successfully pilot solutions on future projects, where appropriate,will be subject to funding availability, relevant DfE approvals and compliant process.

Following successful outcomes of the challenge, the pilot study is planned for summer 2027, aligning with typical construction programmes and intensive pre-demolition activities during this period while SRP school sites are largely unoccupied.

The longer-term commercial opportunity is that, in the future, this may be adopted on the several hundred education buildings that are demolished every year, where is it appropriate based on a building's characteristics and project specific constraints.

CPV: Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services · Demolition work · Engineering works and construction works

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Department for Education buys Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work (CPV 4511), and who usually turns up

Department for Education’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work (CPV 4511) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerDepartment for Education · division 45
The marketBuilding demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work (CPV 4511) · Greater London (authority’s region)
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 5 of 11 known-size awards · market: CPV 4511 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=45
45%73%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Greater London (authority’s region).

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 0 of 5 known-location awards · market: CPV 4511 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=55
0%18%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: CPV 4511 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=12
—41 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 41 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 12 procurements with awards; rival share unknown · market: CPV 4511 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=80
—29%

Awards are recorded, but published direct routes and bid counts do not establish this buyer’s share.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 45
0% had one bid
The market10 lots with bid counts · CPV 4511 · Greater London (authority’s region)
10% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid0% / 10%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 1 of 10 lots with published bid counts.
2–30% / 30%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 3 of 10 lots with published bid counts.
4–620% / 50%
Buyer: 1 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 5 of 10 lots with published bid counts.
7+80% / 10%
Buyer: 4 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 1 of 10 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with estimate and award · broad CPV 45
0% below estimate
The market10 lots with estimate and award · CPV 4511 · Greater London (authority’s region)
50% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate0% / 50%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 5 of 10 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%100% / 30%
Buyer: 5 of 5 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 3 of 10 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate0% / 20%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 2 of 10 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 4512 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£100k

This lot lists more than one class in CPV 45. The comparison uses that group.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 278 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet13% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 278 similar lots
1 bid13%
35 of 278 similar past lots received 1 bid (13%).
2–326%
71 of 278 similar past lots received 2–3 (26%).
4–629%
80 of 278 similar past lots received 4–6 (29%).
7+33%
92 of 278 similar past lots received 7+ (33%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £100k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
23 Oct 2026, 17:17 BST
Last source update
23 Oct 2026, 17:17 BST
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-100747
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection servicesDemolition workEngineering works and construction works
Delivery area
Not published
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-078f98 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

23 Oct 2026 → 1 Apr 2027 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published1 day ago
    23 Oct 2026, 17:17 BST
  2. Today
    25 Oct 2026
  3. Market engagementin 41 days
    4 Dec 2026, 23:59 GMT

    Parties interested in applying to the challenge should do so via Innovate UK's challenge site here: www.ktninnovationexchange.co.uk/challenges/447 ↗

    The application form for this challenge will require applicants to provide company information and answer 3 questions - Idea Summary, Technology Readiness and Intellectual Property – each with a limit of 300 words.

    Technical Requirements

    Responses must:

    Clearly identify in your submission if you are offering solutions for 1: Data capture and interpretation and/or 2: data analysis across building types

    Demonstrate how data will be captured from construction sites, noting that the period between ‘soft strip’ being completed and demolition may be as little as 5 days. The pre-demolition window may also be subject to change and there cannot be any impact on overall project programme.

    Use of a data capture method that is widely available in the market and therefore accessible to DfE framework contractors.

    Provide opportunity for automated processes and demonstrate how these will be able to process captured data to accurately identify and distinguish between key construction materials and arrangements. DfE would like to understand how structural components can be differentiated e.g. precast vs in-situ concrete elements, different system build construction types, structural components in floor and roof systems etc.

    Identify key construction types and structural arrangements, and demonstrate how technology solutions can identify,classify and assess any visible defects (e.g. cracking, staining, corrosion, moisture damage, section loss etc.), including for severity, to identify patterns and potential vulnerabilities associated with specific materials and structural arrangements.

    Demonstrate how analysis outputs will communicate and summarise common defects, deterioration patterns and trends, enabling DfE officials to gain insights into structural condition across the estate.

    Produce consistent records that support comparison across construction types, sites and estate level

    Have the ability to “learn” and become an increasingly autonomous system

    There must be a method for ingesting captured data and analysis outputs into DfE’s CDE, compliant with the data requirements outlined.

    Demonstrate value-for-money over routine survey and manual reporting methods

    DfE would also like to understand more about the system architecture, data processing rules, and data storage, management and retention rules that a live, routine service would require.

    Following this challenge, successful applicant(s) may be invited to take part ina pilot study in up to 3 schools. Participation in the pilot is subject to DfE commercial procurement processes and budget availability.

    Successful methodologies being tested in live SRP settings, must consider the following operating conditions:

    • Sites will have been handed over to an SRP contractor who will be responsible for all site operations. Attendees would need to follow all required site processes including health and safety procedures.
    • Access will be limited to a short pre-demolition window, typically between asbestos removal and demolition commencement.
    • Data capture and any on-site calibration or development activities shall take place following asbestos removal and soft-strip activities, when structural elements are more readily visible.
    • Structural elements are unlikely to be fully exposed or cleaned prior to survey activities and may be dirty, dusty and remain partially obscured by residual materials.

    The following approaches are considered not suitable:

    • Solutions that assess building fabric condition only. Proposals must identify defects and vulnerabilities in primary load bearing structural elements (roofs, suspended floors, stability elements, columns, load bearing walls etc.).
    • Solutions requiring monitoring, repeat inspections or multiple site visits.
    • Approaches that require significant changes to SRP contractor activities, demolition sequencing or site operations.
    • Any approach that results in significant additional project costs or material impacts on project programme.
    • Solutions that entail the removal of more materials to expose the structural elements.

    Applicants should outline the expected costs for developing and piloting their proposed solution(s).

    Outline costs should cover:

    • Development of a suitable automation tool
    • Data capture requirements
    • Data processing and analysis
    • Associated licensing costs

    DfE would like to understand costs associated with scalability of suitable solutions and would like indicative costs for applying the methodology in 1, 3, 5 and 10 school blocks. Consider that each block has a Gross Internal Floor Area (GIFA) of 2000m2 which may be spread over multiple levels.

    The successful applicant(s) must be:

    • Established businesses, academic institutions, start-ups, SMEs, or individual entrepreneurs. Academic Institutions and RTOs must have a partner offering a clear route to market.
    • UK based or have the intention to set up a UK base.

    DfE is open to joint applications to deliver the full scope of the challenge.

    Applications will be assessed on:

    • Relevance to the defined challenge
    • Technology readiness
    • Ability to maximise the data obtained and hence value of the data interpretation
    • Capability for delivering meaningful outputs and engineering-based insights using captured structural condition data
    • Capability for reliably identifying common trends, defects and deterioration patterns in various building structures and components
    • Value for money, proportionality and benefits of implementation over routine survey and manual reporting methods.
    • Ability to apply solutions during short site-access windows and flexibility to mobilise at short notice.
    • Experience in using automation tools and methodologies in built environment or relatable settings
    • Credibility evidence of applicants
    • Potential for scalability and implementation as a standardised methodology across a range of school and college buildings.
    • Economic impacts on construction delivery programmes and site operations
    • Compliance with data protection legislation and DfE data requirements

    Successful applicants will be invited to present solutions at “pitch day”, where these will be evaluated by a panel of assessors. DfE representatives covering structural engineering, construction delivery and digital, data and technology areas, along with SRP contractors, will form the panel.

    Data requirements

    A. Application Stage:

    • Applicants should set out their proposed retention periods and disposal arrangements for raw and processed data, and the storage implications of a large-scale routine service. Secure deletion or return of DfE data at the end of the service is required.
    • Provide a high-level description of the solution architecture covering capture devices, data transfer, processing and analysis components, storage, integration arrangements and any dependencies on third-party services.

    B. Pilot Stage:

    • DfE retains ownership of all captured data, derived datasets and analysis outputs, with unrestricted rights to use, retain, share and re-analyse them.
    • Captured data shall support interoperability and be in open or widely supported formats. Structured outputs (defect records, classifications, severity assessments, material identification) should be in a machine-readable format that can be integrated with DfE systems without requiring licensing or proprietary software.
    • Applicants must be willing to adopt a DfE-defined data contract setting out field definitions, permitted values, validation rules and plausibility checks for structured outputs. Outputs shall support comparison across sites and the wider estate.
    • Produce consistent and traceable records through clear metadata, capture methodology, auditability, data provenance, and confidence and quality assurance measures for analysis.
    • Demonstrate data quality and assurance approach for automated outputs, how these will be distinguishable from human-verified records, and how uncertainty is communicated to users.
    • Provide methodology for ingesting captured data and analysis outputs into DfE’s CDE, ensuring secure data submission methods and compliance with agreed validation and acceptance processes.
    • Meet security, privacy and information governance requirements, including compliance with the Government Cyber Security Standard and the UK GDPR / Data Protection Act 2018. Demonstrate secure data storage and transfer, access controls, incident management, and appropriate handling of personal or sensitive information.
    • Deliver accessible and usable outputs, including dashboards, reports or viewers that can be used by DfE staff without specialist software or training.
  4. Contract startsin 158 days
    1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    23 Oct 2026, 17:17 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

3 public bodies on the notice

Department for Education

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PDZG-3487-DPVD Sanctuary Buildings, 20 Great Smith Street, London, London, SW1P3BTContact email

Other public bodies

  • UK Research and InnovationBeneficiary authority
  • UK Research and Innovation - Innovate UKProcess contact pointProcuring entityDfE is working with Innovate UK to run an Innovation Exchange Challenge to explore simple, scalable and cost-effective ways to capture and analyse structural-condition data from school and college buildings in SRP, immediately before demolition. Innovate UK is leading promotion of the challenge and will handle any application or challenge queries.GB-PPON: PDQJ-7126-JDHG Swindon, South WestContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure