Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 19 May 2026, 13:57 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Human Research Tissue Bank System Integration

Authority: Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Central government)

GoodsAbove thresholdSME suitable
Planned pipeline value£1,500,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 3 Aug 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 2 yrs 6 moends 31 Mar 2029 · starts 1 Oct 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) is seeking a development partner to scope, design and deliver an integrated solution for the collection, storage, use and release of human tissue for research. The state-of-the-art solution must be fully compliant with the legal framework of the Human Tissue Act 2004 and ensure that there is transparent and real-time auditable, tracking and ethical use of all human tissue samples, irrespective of their source, across the Cambridge Biomedical Campus. The solution will also support ISO accreditation (ISO 20387 for biobanking and ISO 15189 for diagnostic laboratories)

Central to the new system for tissue originating on the Campus, will be the use of the Epic electronic patient record at CUH. Streamlined and efficient interoperability between Epic and existing data systems – for example the Achiever Database used by research teams across the campus and the Edge Research Management system is essential. Human tissue sent from external organisations must also be tracked once it arrives on the Campus.

User-centric interfaces and back-end services driven by secure AI-based processes will be central to the delivery of rich functionality which would include new case identification, timely specimen collection, real time data updates on specimens and linked data and continuous audit to detect potential statutory breaches.

The collection, storage and release of tissue samples is the responsibility of the Human Research Tissue Bank (HRTB) in the Histopathology Department at 1000 Discovery Drive. Duplicate between-system data entry must be avoided. Full integration with the working processes in the Histopathology Department is required, including the Inpeco automated tissue management system and the Phillips Image Management System. The Histopathology Department uses the Epic Beaker Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) linked to the Epic electronic patient record. At its core the new system must be designed to support the day-to day work of all the HRTB staff and the statutory responsibilities of the Designated Individual for the Human Tissue Authority.

The solution must support current and future consent models, including structured capture of research tissue consent status, consent versioning, selective permissions where approved, withdrawal/revocation, and auditable linkage of consent status to tissue requests and release decisions. The system must be designed so that future broad front-door research consent, wider data linkage and patient-facing transparency can be supported, and provide consenting participants with access (potentially through the NHS app or the Epic MyChart app) to a secure timely audit of how their tissue and data has been used.

The tissue and linked data collected through this proposed system will be made available to approved academic and commercial researchers in the UK and abroad. All such access must ensure patient anonymity and confidentiality. The developed system must provide a detailed and easy to use search facility through which potential samples can be identified and requested. The system should allow users to request specific samples be collected and selected tissue cohorts to be supplemented.

In line with Trust policy, human tissue will never be sold for profit. For the system to be sustainable, however, a full cost-recovery for tissue samples and data services will be applied where appropriate. The development partner in collaboration with commercial teams at CUH will review and evaluate existing and potential cost models which, once agreed, will require implementation.

CPV: Medical software package

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Planned 2 yrs 6 moSME
Contract period: 1 Oct 2026 – 31 Mar 2029 (2 yrs 6 mo)
Delivery: East of EnglandEligibility: SME eligible

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust buys Medical software package (CPV 4818), and who usually turns up

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Medical software package (CPV 4818) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
The marketMedical software package (CPV 4818) · East of England
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 3 of 31 known-size awards · market: CPV 4818 · East of England, n=13
10%31%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in East of England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 16 of 39 known-location awards · market: CPV 4818 · East of England, n=22
41%18%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: division 48 · East of England, n=25
—63 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 63 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 2 of 45 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 4818 · East of England, n=28
4%71%

Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyerToo few to chart: 2 lots with bid counts, 5 needed · broad CPV 48
The market45 lots with bid counts · division 48 · East of England
18% had one bid
Market · select a colour for counts
1 bid18%
Market: 8 of 45 lots with published bid counts.
2–327%
Market: 12 of 45 lots with published bid counts.
4–640%
Market: 18 of 45 lots with published bid counts.
7+16%
Market: 7 of 45 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyerNo estimate-and-award pairs published
The market24 lots with estimate and award · division 48 · East of England
67% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate67%
Market: 16 of 24 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%13%
Market: 3 of 24 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate21%
Market: 5 of 24 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 481830 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£1.5m
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 45 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet18% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 45 similar lots
1 bid18%
8 of 45 similar past lots received 1 bid (18%).
2–327%
12 of 45 similar past lots received 2–3 (27%).
4–640%
18 of 45 similar past lots received 4–6 (40%).
7+16%
7 of 45 similar past lots received 7+ (16%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £1.5m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
19 May 2026, 13:57 BST
Last source update
19 May 2026, 13:57 BST
Authority reference
ADD/PU/KM/26/08
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-045749
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Medical software package
Delivery area
East of England (UKH12)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-069be8 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

19 May 2026 → 1 Oct 2026 · 4 dates
  1. Planning notice published160 days ago
    19 May 2026, 13:57 BST
  2. Market engagement86 days ago
    31 Jul 2026, 23:59 BST

    Company's interested in this project are in the first instance invited to contact Mr Colin Carr - Project Manager, Human Research Tissue Bank ([email protected]) no later than Friday 5th June 2026 to further discuss project scope, system solutions and potential future involvement in the procurement process.

  3. Tender notice expected83 days ago
    3 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
  4. Contract starts25 days ago
    1 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    19 May 2026, 13:57 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-NHS: RGT Hills Road, Cambridge, East of England, CB2 0QQContact name, email, phone

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure