Official UK procurement notice
Human Research Tissue Bank System Integration
Authority: Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionCambridge University NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) is seeking a development partner to scope, design and deliver an integrated solution for the collection, storage, use and release of human tissue for research. The state-of-the-art solution must be fully compliant with the legal framework of the Human Tissue Act 2004 and ensure that there is transparent and real-time auditable, tracking and ethical use of all human tissue samples, irrespective of their source, across the Cambridge Biomedical Campus. The solution will also support ISO accreditation (ISO 20387 for biobanking and ISO 15189 for diagnostic laboratories)
Central to the new system for tissue originating on the Campus, will be the use of the Epic electronic patient record at CUH. Streamlined and efficient interoperability between Epic and existing data systems – for example the Achiever Database used by research teams across the campus and the Edge Research Management system is essential. Human tissue sent from external organisations must also be tracked once it arrives on the Campus.
User-centric interfaces and back-end services driven by secure AI-based processes will be central to the delivery of rich functionality which would include new case identification, timely specimen collection, real time data updates on specimens and linked data and continuous audit to detect potential statutory breaches.
The collection, storage and release of tissue samples is the responsibility of the Human Research Tissue Bank (HRTB) in the Histopathology Department at 1000 Discovery Drive. Duplicate between-system data entry must be avoided. Full integration with the working processes in the Histopathology Department is required, including the Inpeco automated tissue management system and the Phillips Image Management System. The Histopathology Department uses the Epic Beaker Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) linked to the Epic electronic patient record. At its core the new system must be designed to support the day-to day work of all the HRTB staff and the statutory responsibilities of the Designated Individual for the Human Tissue Authority.
The solution must support current and future consent models, including structured capture of research tissue consent status, consent versioning, selective permissions where approved, withdrawal/revocation, and auditable linkage of consent status to tissue requests and release decisions. The system must be designed so that future broad front-door research consent, wider data linkage and patient-facing transparency can be supported, and provide consenting participants with access (potentially through the NHS app or the Epic MyChart app) to a secure timely audit of how their tissue and data has been used.
The tissue and linked data collected through this proposed system will be made available to approved academic and commercial researchers in the UK and abroad. All such access must ensure patient anonymity and confidentiality. The developed system must provide a detailed and easy to use search facility through which potential samples can be identified and requested. The system should allow users to request specific samples be collected and selected tissue cohorts to be supplemented.
In line with Trust policy, human tissue will never be sold for profit. For the system to be sustainable, however, a full cost-recovery for tissue samples and data services will be applied where appropriate. The development partner in collaboration with commercial teams at CUH will review and evaluate existing and potential cost models which, once agreed, will require implementation.
CPV: Medical software package
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust buys Medical software package (CPV 4818), and who usually turns up
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Medical software package (CPV 4818) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in East of England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 63 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid18%
2–327%
4–640%
7+16%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate67%
Within ±2%13%
Above estimate21%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 4818Published estimate£1.5m
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 45 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid18%
2–327%
4–640%
7+16%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Goods
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 19 May 2026, 13:57 BST
- Last source update
- 19 May 2026, 13:57 BST
- Authority reference
ADD/PU/KM/26/08- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-045749- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-069be8Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
19 May 2026 → 1 Oct 2026 · 4 dates- Planning notice published160 days ago19 May 2026, 13:57 BST
- Market engagement86 days ago31 Jul 2026, 23:59 BST
Company's interested in this project are in the first instance invited to contact Mr Colin Carr - Project Manager, Human Research Tissue Bank ([email protected]) no later than Friday 5th June 2026 to further discuss project scope, system solutions and potential future involvement in the procurement process.
- Tender notice expected83 days ago3 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
- Contract starts25 days ago1 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published19 May 2026, 13:57 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender