Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 26 Jan 2026, 14:26 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Enabling Services Strategic Review

Authority: The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police (Police & fire)

ServicesAbove thresholdSME suitable
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 18 Apr 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 1 yrends 30 Jun 2027 · starts 1 Jul 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Pre-Market Engagement (PME)

Background

Thames valley Police (TVP) is the largest non-metropolitan police force in the country and polices the counties of Oxfordshire, Berkshire and Buckinghamshire. It also provides services to a number of other forces under collaborative arrangements. The force employs nearly 10,000 officers and staff.

TVP, like so many organisations, is looking to improve the quality and efficiency of the services that the People and Financial Directorates and the Tasking & Resilience department (our Enabling Services) provide to the Force and their wider stakeholder requirements. The Enabling Services are therefore looking to transform the quality of the services it provides in terms of ensuring an excellent customer experience whilst also creating much greater insights to allow the Force to make better decisions. This is all against the backdrop of needing to reduce non-value-added costs and so deliver cashable savings to the Force.

The Force are looking to appoint by competitive process a strategic partner who can ensure we use our current systems to deliver on our ambitions.

Work to date has identified 3 essential first stage requirements.

  • the implementation of a Transactional service centre
  • Experience in building change programmes alongside the implementation of an integrated IT solution incorporating ITSM, CRM (incl CMDM) and Agentic AI and a single customer front end portal.
  • The ability for improved decision making by ensuring that there is appropriate and accurate data/information available at the time required in a format to support decision makers.
  • We are looking to appoint a strategic partner capable of delivering not just short-term change but to change the capabilities and culture of the organisation to ensure that continuous improvement becomes a core skill. This will mean that the Force's Enabling Services can manage change as an evolutionary internal process and not need to engage external consultancy support in the future. This will include a set of clear and achievable recommendations as to changes in the structure and delivery mechanisms for change management process and management within the Force. Customer focus and Data maturity sit alongside efficiency.

Followed by a Stage 2 Data Integration (this will be based upon the CMDB integration system.

Budget for the entire project across all phases will be in the region of £4m-£5m.

CPV: Administrative services for business operations · Business development consultancy services · Human resources management consultancy services · Project management consultancy services · Project-design services other than for construction work · Project-supervision services other than for construction work · System quality assurance assessment and review services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police buys Business and management consultancy services (CPV 7941), and who usually turns up

The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Business and management consultancy services (CPV 7941) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bidWhat to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 4 of 11 known-size awards · market: no supplier sizes published
36%—

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 6 of 11 known-location awards · market: no winner locations published
55%—

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in the delivery region.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: no decision dates published
——

No decision dates published to compare.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The buyer’s share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 13 of 16 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: no bid counts or routes published
81%—

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 794112 monthsSME suitableEstimate not published
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 277 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet16% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 277 similar lots
1 bid16%
43 of 277 similar past lots received 1 bid (16%).
2–320%
56 of 277 similar past lots received 2–3 (20%).
4–625%
68 of 277 similar past lots received 4–6 (25%).
7+40%
110 of 277 similar past lots received 7+ (40%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
26 Jan 2026, 14:26 GMT
Last source update
6 Feb 2026, 09:31 GMT
Authority reference
PS25019
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-010771
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Administrative services for business operationsBusiness development consultancy servicesHuman resources management consultancy servicesProject management consultancy servicesProject-design services other than for construction workProject-supervision services other than for construction workSystem quality assurance assessment and review services
Delivery area
London (UKI)South East (UKJ)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-060eb5 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

26 Jan 2026 → 1 Jul 2026 · 5 dates
  1. Planning notice published269 days ago
    26 Jan 2026, 14:26 GMT
  2. Latest notice published258 days ago
    6 Feb 2026, 09:31 GMT
  3. Market engagement245 days ago
    18 Feb 2026, 23:59 GMT

    Event Details:

    Date: Early March 2026

    Time: Individual timeslots to be confirmed - Please confirm any dates that you CANNOT attend

    Duration: 60-90 minutes

    Please confirm your availability and provide a short summary of your relevant experience by Noon 18th February 2026 to [email protected]. We will then confirm your allocated MS-Teams slot to present to TVP.

    Further information relating to this project and requirements for presentations can be found in the link below.

    www.thamesvalley.police.uk/police-forces/thames… ↗

  4. Tender notice expected187 days ago
    18 Apr 2026, 23:59 BST
  5. Contract starts114 days ago
    1 Jul 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

2 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 26 Jan 2026
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    26 Jan 2026, 14:26 GMT
    UK2
  2. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    6 Feb 2026, 09:31 GMT
    UK2
Published amendments (1)

Expansion of CPV codes to help ensure suppliers are aware of opportunity

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PQWX-7678-NJGQ Thames Valley Police - HQ North, Kidlington, South East, OX5 1NZContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (2)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure