Official UK procurement notice
DHSC - ASC: Supplier engagement PIN for Case Management System foundational specification consultation
Authority: Department of Health & Social Care (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThere is no procurement activity relating to the publication of this Prior Information Notice (PIN). <br/><br/>The purpose of this PIN is to invite current and prospective suppliers of Case Management Systems (CMSs) for Adult Social Care (ASC) to Local Authorities (LAs) to attend a series of consultation sessions on Case Management System foundational specifications. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) at the request of LAs have developed a set of foundational specifications which set out 'what good looks like' for priority areas of CMSs. We are planning to publish these specifications next year and in advance of this we would like to invite current and prospective suppliers to review and provide feedback on each chapter of the proposed specification so that we can ensure they are fit for purpose.<br/><br/>Participation in the consultation sessions will be restricted to companies with appropriate interest in CMS's. Please email the named contacts in this notice for further details on the engagement and participation details.
CPV: Administrative social services · Patient-administration system
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1This PIN is to support market engagement activity, no procurement is associated with…Planned
This PIN is to support market engagement activity, no procurement is associated with this notice.<br/><br/>The foundational specifications for CMSs arose from the Department's work to prepare for the introduction of charging reform, during which we engaged with multiple stakeholders in the CMS market and gained significant insights from the experience and knowledge of LAs and suppliers. One point we heard consistently was that there was a lack of clarity on what a ‘good’ CMS looked like. This in turn made it more difficult for suppliers to develop and implement CMSs and for LAs to cost-effectively procure systems. In response to this, we are developing a series of foundational specifications that focus on the following components:<br/> Interoperability<br/> Data and reporting<br/> Self-service <br/> Core record<br/> Non-functional requirements<br/><br/>We are aiming to publish these specifications in spring 2024. These specifications are not being introduced as mandatory for LAs or suppliers, but will serve as a foundation on which LAs and suppliers can build their CMSs. By clarifying core requirements, both LAs and suppliers will be able to focus their time and attention on developing more innovative and interoperable CMSs. This support for the CMS market is part of our broader efforts to reform social care as set out in our Care Data Matters strategy. As part of this work, we are working closely with LAs, the Department of Education (DfE) and the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (DLUHC) to ensure we are aligned across government. In addition to these specifications, we are planning to publish a statement of intent jointly with DfE which will provide further detail on our view of the current and future state of the CMS market and set out our wider strategy for supporting it. We are excited by this opportunity to better support and empower the CMS market and we would appreciate your input on these specifications.<br/><br/>The supplier consultation sessions will run between December 2023 and February 2024 on specific components of the foundational specification prior to the full specification publication. If you would like to attend please contact [email protected]. Attendance at these sessions will be limited to current and prospective suppliers of CMSs for ASC in the UK market and will function at the discretion of the organiser. In advance of these meetings we are planning to share materials with registered participants, relevant to the chapter being discussed. There will be a brief presentation followed by a discussion where we will invite you as suppliers to share your thoughts and feedback. Additional information: In addition to this PIN we have written individually to each active CMS supplier inviting them to these sessions.<br/><br/>In developing these specifications we have worked with a reference group of LAs who will also be invited to these consultation sessions.
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Department of Health & Social Care buys Information systems (CPV 4881), and who usually turns up
Department of Health & Social Care’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Information systems (CPV 4881) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in Greater London.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in Greater London.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 29 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid30% / 14%
2–328% / 43%
4–626% / 43%
7+16% / 0%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate50% / 58%
Within ±2%50% / 12%
Above estimate0% / 31%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1This PIN is to support market engagement activity, no procurement is associated with…CPV 4881No real estimate
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 48 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid21%
2–319%
4–644%
7+17%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record · publisher note attached- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Goods
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 5 Dec 2023, 09:24 GMT
- Last source update
- 5 Dec 2023, 09:24 GMT
- FTS notice number
2023/S 000-035735- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0421a7Find a Tender
Publisher note: Additional CPV codes that apply.<br/>• 48180000 : Medical software package<br/>• 72212180 : Medical software development services
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
5 Dec 2023 → 29 Nov 2026 · 2 dates- Notice published5 Dec 2023, 09:24 GMT
- Today20 Oct 2026
- Tender notice expectedin 39 days29 Nov 2026
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.