Find a TenderPlanned procurement
Published 16 Apr 2026, 16:12 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Community‑Based Weight Management Service

Authority: NHS Lincolnshire Integrated Care Board (Central government)

Services
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 1 Sept 2026from the planned procurement notice

What is being bought

Published requirement description

This is a notice to inform the market of the intention to award a contract for a Community‑Based Weight Management Service via the Most Suitable Provider Process

CPV: Health services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1The Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023, Paragraph 10 -…Planned

The Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023, Paragraph 10 - The Most Suitable Provider Process is being used to commission this service. This notice will be live for fourteen (14) days from the date of publication.

This is a notice to inform the market of the intention to award a contract for a Community‑Based Weight Management Service via the Most Suitable Provider process.

  1. Purpose

This following sets out the mandatory requirements, assessment criteria, and evidence expectations that will be applied under the Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Most Suitable Provider (MSP) process for the Community‑Based Weight Management Service.

The criteria reflect:

the OPIP‑approved delivery model,

the Integrated Care Board's statutory duties relating to prevention, health inequalities and continuity, and

the need for safe and timely mobilisation by September 2026.

The service is designed as a single, integrated, population‑level pathway, rather than a referral‑only or stand‑alone digital offer.

Given the fixed OPIP delivery model, the requirement for continuity of care, the dependency on Primary Care‑led population health infrastructure, and the mobilisation timeline associated with OPIP funding, the ICB has determined that a Most Suitable Provider (MSP) process represents the most proportionate and appropriate provider selection approach.

  1. Mandatory Requirements

(All mandatory requirements must be met in full.)

2.1 Primary Care / Neighbourhood Delivery Capability

The provider must demonstrate the ability to deliver services through Primary Care-led neighbourhood structures, including:

operational delivery through Primary Care Networks (PCNs) or equivalent neighbourhood arrangements;

integration with General Practice and community MDTs;

local, place‑based access rather than out‑of‑area or remote‑only provision.

2.2 Delivery of Obesity Prevention Innovation Programme (OPIP‑Approved Model)

The provider must demonstrate the ability to deliver the OPIP‑approved model exactly as submitted, including pathway design, delivery approach and provider continuity.

The delivery model is fixed for the 30‑month OPIP programme period.

The provider must accept that material amendment to the model is not permitted.

2.3 Population‑Level Identification, Screening and Pathway Routing

The provider must be able to deliver a population‑level, prevention‑led pathway that identifies and manages all adults with overweight and obesity, rather than operating referral‑only services.

The service will operate as a single front door for overweight and obese adults within Primary Care, with pharmacotherapy eligibility and community‑based support determined through one integrated pathway.

This includes:

proactive identification of adults with overweight and obesity through Primary Care records and neighbourhood teams;

clinical screening of identified individuals against relevant NICE guidance, including TA1026 eligibility criteria, undertaken within Primary Care governance;

operation of a single integrated routing model, such that:

individuals who meet TA1026 criteria and consent are signposted to, or commence, the TA1026 pharmacotherapy pathway; and

individuals who do not meet TA1026 criteria are offered timely access to the community‑based weight management service.

The provider must demonstrate the ability to operate this model at scale, ensuring no cohort is excluded on the basis of pharmacotherapy eligibility.

2.4 Clinical Pharmacotherapy Governance (Including TA1026)

The provider must demonstrate the ability to deliver clinically governed pharmacotherapy within Primary Care, in line with NICE guidance (including TA1026).

This includes:

prescribing and monitoring operating outside a Specialist Weight Management Service (SWMS) as the primary clinical setting;

Primary Care clinical governance, including MDT oversight, escalation and medicines optimisation alignment;

integration of pharmacotherapy delivery alongside behavioural, nutritional and psychological support.

Remotely delivered or digitally‑only prescribing models operating independently of Primary Care governance will not meet this requirement.

2.5 Population Health Management (PHM), JID and Data Infrastructure (Non‑negotiable)

To support population‑level screening and pathway routing, the provider must demonstrate:

capability to operate population health management activity within Primary Care governance, including proactive identification, stratification, recall and monitoring;

the ability to lawfully access, process and use ICB‑approved population‑level data (including the Joint Intelligence Dataset or equivalent datasets), where relevant to delivery of the service, subject to appropriate information governance approvals;

the ability to put in place any required data sharing, processing or access arrangements at mobilisation, in line with UK GDPR, DSPT and ICB information governance requirements;

capability to support identification and engagement of high‑risk cohorts, including:

people with Severe Mental Illness (SMI), including identification through SMI Health Checks and proactive engagement to address elevated cardiometabolic risk;

people with multimorbidity;

residents in deprived, rural or coastal communities.

Providers unable to demonstrate this capability will not be able to deliver the required model.

2.6 Hybrid Delivery Model (Digital and Face‑to‑Face)

The provider must demonstrate the ability to deliver a hybrid model combining:

digital triage, monitoring and behavioural support;

face‑to‑face MDT input delivered locally;

assisted digital support for digitally excluded populations.

Digital tools are expected to enable, rather than replace, clinically governed local delivery.

Delivery must not be predominantly digital or remote.

2.7 Mobilisation by September 2026

The provider must demonstrate the ability to mobilise the full service safely and operationally by September 2026, including:

workforce readiness;

clinical governance arrang…

Delivery: East Midlands

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How NHS Lincolnshire Integrated Care Board buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up

NHS Lincolnshire Integrated Care Board’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
The marketHealth services (CPV 8510) · East Midlands
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 280 of 305 known-size awards · market: CPV 8510 · East Midlands, n=506
92%55%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in East Midlands.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 419 of 447 known-location awards · market: CPV 8510 · East Midlands, n=682
94%61%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: CPV 8510 · East Midlands, n=11
—57 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 57 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 398 of 403 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 8510 · East Midlands, n=297
99%76%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 85
20% had one bid
The market42 lots with bid counts · CPV 8510 · East Midlands
14% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid20% / 14%
Buyer: 1 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 6 of 42 lots with published bid counts.
2–30% / 40%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 17 of 42 lots with published bid counts.
4–640% / 21%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 9 of 42 lots with published bid counts.
7+40% / 24%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 10 of 42 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer6 lots with estimate and award · all categories
33% below estimate
The market31 lots with estimate and award · CPV 8510 · East Midlands
42% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate33% / 42%
Buyer: 2 of 6 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 13 of 31 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%67% / 48%
Buyer: 4 of 6 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 15 of 31 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate0% / 10%
Buyer: 0 of 6 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 3 of 31 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1The Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023, Paragraph 10 -…CPV 8510Estimate not published
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 42 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet14% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 42 similar lots
1 bid14%
6 of 42 similar past lots received 1 bid (14%).
2–340%
17 of 42 similar past lots received 2–3 (40%).
4–621%
9 of 42 similar past lots received 4–6 (21%).
7+24%
10 of 42 similar past lots received 7+ (24%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 3 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

SupplierThis buyer’s earlier contractLotAward valueWhy listed
Lincolnshire Integrated Voluntary Emergency Services (LIVES)Earlier contractCommunity Servicesnotice published Aug 2025—£2.4mMatched as the earlier contract

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record · publisher note attached
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
16 Apr 2026, 16:12 BST
Last source update
16 Apr 2026, 16:12 BST
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-034857
Classification (CPV)
Health services
Delivery area
East Midlands (UKF3)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-068487 Find a Tender

Publisher note: This is a Provider Section Regime (PSR) intended approach notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Procurement Act 2023 do not apply to this award. The award decision maker is the Joint Commissioning Review Group in line with the ICB's Scheme of Reservation and Delegation. The intention is to award a contract using the most suitable provider process.

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

16 Apr 2026 → 1 Sept 2026 · 2 dates
  1. Notice published191 days ago
    16 Apr 2026, 16:12 BST
  2. Tender notice expected53 days ago
    1 Sept 2026, 00:00 BST

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

NHS LINCOLNSHIRE INTEGRATED CARE BOARD

Contracting authorityCentral GovernmentBody governed by public lawHealth Bridge House The Point Lions Way, Sleaford, East Midlands, NG348GGContact email

Official documents & specifications

Official links; attachments are not copied

No document links were published on the notice.