Official UK procurement notice
Assets and Facilities Management Software
Authority: Reading Borough Council (Local council)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionReading Borough Council is seeking market engagement with suppliers capable of delivering a single, integrated, cloud-hosted Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) solution for Property, Asset, Estates and Facilities Management.
The Council is seeking to replace and consolidate multiple existing systems into a unified platform that will support the management of its property portfolio, assets, facilities, maintenance activities and compliance obligations through a single integrated solution.
The Council is interested in solutions that can support:
- Management of property and estate records, including land and buildings, leases, tenancies, valuations, acquisitions and disposals, estate portfolios, property hierarchies and associated property information.
- Asset management activities across the asset lifecycle, including asset registers, condition information, surveys, performance monitoring, lifecycle planning, replacement forecasting and associated asset documentation.
- Facilities management (CAFM) functions, including helpdesk operations, service requests, work order management, contractor management, planned preventative maintenance, reactive maintenance, inspections, scheduling, performance monitoring and service delivery management.
- Compliance and health and safety management activities, including statutory inspections, certifications, risk assessments, compliance monitoring, audit requirements, reporting and management of compliance-related information.
- Management of planned works, capital projects and programme activities, including budgets, milestones, resources, documentation, progress monitoring and governance requirements.
- Property inspections, condition surveys and field-based activities, including the capture, management and reporting of inspection information, defects, actions, photographs and supporting records.
- Financial and purchasing processes associated with property, asset and facilities management activities, including expenditure monitoring, purchasing workflows, budget management and management reporting.
- Customer, user, supplier and contractor engagement through self-service and portal capabilities, supporting service requests, enquiries, collaboration and status tracking.
- Workflow management and automation capabilities that improve operational efficiency through configurable business processes, approvals, notifications, escalations and audit trails.
- Document and records management capabilities supporting the storage, retrieval, management and control of property, asset, project, maintenance and compliance-related information.
- Reporting, business intelligence and dashboard functionality that supports operational management, performance monitoring, compliance reporting and strategic decision-making.
- Integration capabilities that support connectivity with existing and future corporate systems, enabling improved data sharing, reduced duplication and a more connected operating environment.
The Council expects the proposed solution to support the creation of a single source of truth for property, asset, estates and facilities management information, improving visibility, governance, operational effectiveness and data quality across the organisation.
A significant element of the requirement will involve the migration and consolidation of data currently held within multiple existing systems. The Council is therefore seeking to understand supplier approaches to discovery, implementation, transition planning, data mapping, migration, validation, testing, user adoption and ongoing support arrangements, together with approaches to maintaining data integrity and business continuity throughout the implementation process.
The solution must be delivered as a fully hosted SaaS service within the UK and be compliant with UK GDPR and applicable information governance requirements. Suppliers are invited to provide information regarding security, resilience, access controls, auditability, business continuity and disaster recovery capabilities.
Market Engagement Objectives
The Council wishes to use this engagement exercise to better understand:
- Current market capabilities and available solutions.
- Approaches to delivering an integrated Property, Asset, Estates and Facilities Management platform.
- Implementation methodologies and typical delivery timescales.
- Data migration, transition and change management approaches.
Integration capabilities and API functionality.
- Licensing, subscription and commercial models.
- Support, maintenance and customer success arrangements.
- Product development roadmaps and future innovation.
- Opportunities to improve operational efficiency, reporting, compliance management and service delivery.
- Indicative implementation and ongoing operational costs.
Indicative Pricing Information
Suppliers are invited to provide high-level indicative ("thumb-rule") pricing information covering:
- Implementation and mobilisation.
- Configuration and solution setup.
- Data migration and transition activities.
- Integration services.
- Training and user adoption support.
- Annual licensing or subscription fees.
- Support and maintenance services.
- Optional modules, functionality and value-added services.
- Use of Information Provided
Information received through this market engagement exercise may be used by the Council to review, refine and strengthen its requirements, specification, procurement strategy, commercial approach, evaluation methodology, budget assumptions and business case.
The Council may also use information provided by suppliers, including indicative pricing, commercial models, implementation approaches, market intelligence and lessons learned, for benchmarking, affordability assessments, cost modelling, budget planning and procurement preparation activities.
Suppliers should clearly identify any information that is considered proprietary, commercially confidential or subject to intellectual property rights. Whilst the Council may utilise non-confidential market feedback, pricing information and industry insights to inform future procurement documentation, the Council does not intend to reproduce supplier-specific intellectual property, proprietary methodologies, copyrighted material or confidential solution designs without appropriate permission.
Any future specification will be developed independently by the Council based on its business requirements, market feedback and procurement objectives and will be designed to ensure transparency, fairness and equal treatment of all suppliers.
CPV: Facilities management software package and software package suite
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Reading Borough Council buys Facilities management software package and software package suite (CPV 4842), and who usually turns up
Reading Borough Council’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Facilities management software package and software package suite (CPV 4842) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means the winner is registered in the region where that contract was delivered.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside South East England.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 55 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid39% / 0%
2–316% / 14%
4–621% / 32%
7+24% / 55%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate25% / 52%
Within ±2%67% / 22%
Above estimate8% / 26%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 4842Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 40 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid23%
2–323%
4–635%
7+20%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Goods
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 27 Jul 2026, 11:46 BST
- Last source update
- 27 Jul 2026, 11:46 BST
- Authority reference
25-T-027- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-070721- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Not published
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06d424Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
27 Jul 2026 → 1 Jan 2027 · 3 dates- Planning notice published86 days ago27 Jul 2026, 11:46 BST
- Market engagement69 days ago12 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
For expressions of interest or any clarification questions, please contact [email protected]
- Today21 Oct 2026
- Contract startsin 72 days1 Jan 2027
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published27 Jul 2026, 11:46 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender