Find a TenderPlanned procurementPipeline notice
Published 23 May 2025, 10:12 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Advocacy Services across Leicestershire, Leicester, and Rutland

Authority: Leicestershire County Council (Local council)

ServicesOpen procedureAbove thresholdLight touch regimeSME suitableVCSE suitable
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 1 Apr 2028from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 5 yrsends 31 Mar 2034 · starts 1 Apr 2029

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The successful provider will be responsible for the delivery of four distinct types of advocacy services as listed below:

Independent Mental Capacity Advocacy (IMCA)

The Mental Capacity Act makes statutory provisions for an IMCA to provide independent support for people who lack capacity to make important decisions. This must be provided by an organisation who is independent of the local LLR Group and the NHS.

Independent NHS Complaints Advocacy (ICAS)

This advocacy relates to members of the public or their carers making or intending to make an NHS complaint.

Independent Mental Health Advocacy (IMHA)

This is provided to people who are detained in a secure mental health setting, provisionally discharged, those on Community Treatment Orders and voluntary patients.

Care Act Advocacy

This refers to the statutory requirement under sections 67 and 68 of the Care Act to provide advocacy to people who would experience substantial difficulty in being fully involved in their assessment and other parts of the care pathway.

CPV: Health and social work services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Planned 5 yrsSMEVCSE
Contract period: 1 Apr 2029 – 31 Mar 2034 (5 yrs)
Delivery: East MidlandsEligibility: SME eligibleVCSE eligible

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Leicestershire County Council buys Health and social work services (CPV 85), and who usually turns up

Leicestershire County Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Health and social work services (CPV 85) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerLeicestershire County Council · division 85
The marketHealth and social work services (CPV 85) · East Midlands
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 41 of 55 known-size awards · market: division 85 · East Midlands, n=893
75%47%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning. Small firms win more of this buyer’s work than the market’s: 75% against 47%, n=55.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in East Midlands.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 27 of 33 known-location awards · market: division 85 · East Midlands, n=1,201
82%48%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered. More of this buyer’s work stays local than in this market: 82% against 48%, n=33.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: division 85 · East Midlands, n=124
—46 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 46 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 16 of 32 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 85 · East Midlands, n=913
50%70%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer10 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 85
20% had one bid
The market213 lots with bid counts · division 85 · East Midlands
18% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid20% / 18%
Buyer: 2 of 10 lots with published bid counts. Market: 39 of 213 lots with published bid counts.
2–340% / 34%
Buyer: 4 of 10 lots with published bid counts. Market: 72 of 213 lots with published bid counts.
4–620% / 24%
Buyer: 2 of 10 lots with published bid counts. Market: 51 of 213 lots with published bid counts.
7+20% / 24%
Buyer: 2 of 10 lots with published bid counts. Market: 51 of 213 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer14 lots with estimate and award · broad CPV 85
0% below estimate
The market156 lots with estimate and award · division 85 · East Midlands
33% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate0% / 33%
Buyer: 0 of 14 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 51 of 156 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%100% / 59%
Buyer: 14 of 14 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 92 of 156 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate0% / 8%
Buyer: 0 of 14 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 13 of 156 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 8560 monthsSME suitableEstimate not published

This lot lists more than one class in CPV 85. The comparison uses that group.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 213 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet18% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 213 similar lots
1 bid18%
39 of 213 similar past lots received 1 bid (18%).
2–334%
72 of 213 similar past lots received 2–3 (34%).
4–624%
51 of 213 similar past lots received 4–6 (24%).
7+24%
51 of 213 similar past lots received 7+ (24%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 3 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

SupplierThis buyer’s earlier contractLotAward valueWhy listed
POwHERLive contractAdvocacy Services across Leicestershire, Leicester, and Rutlandruns to Mar 2029—£2.5mMatched as the earlier contract

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

What this replaces
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

100% title match.

A past supplier may not bid again.

The prior contract this notice most likely re-tenders · matched by title and category (100% title match), the holder is not guaranteed to re-bid

Advocacy Services across Leicestershire, Leicester, and Rutland — held by POwHER; the published contract ends 31 Mar 2029.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Open procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Light touch regime
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
23 May 2025, 10:12 BST
Last source update
23 May 2025, 10:12 BST
FTS notice number
2025/S 000-025815
Latest notice
Pipeline notice (UK1)
Classification (CPV)
Health and social work services
Delivery area
East Midlands (UKF2)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0520f0 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

23 May 2025 → 1 Apr 2029 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published
    23 May 2025, 10:12 BST
  2. Today
    28 Oct 2026
  3. Tender notice expected
    1 Apr 2028, 23:59 BST
  4. Contract starts
    1 Apr 2029, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Pipeline notice published
    23 May 2025, 10:12 BST
    UK1

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Leicestershire County Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PNHT-9235-VXDV County Hall, Leicester, East Midlands, LE3 8RAContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure

  • Pipeline notice planningPipeline noticeUK1Pipeline notice on Find a Tender