Micropropagation Services (E.M.) Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyloughboroughEast MidlandsMain market: Horticultural and nursery products

Companies House01947193 ↗ · Active

Where they win
i

6 awards (6 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 6 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

0312 Horticultural and nursery products3 awards · 50% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i
£12mOn 2 of 6 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Award vs estimate
i

Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 03). Small sample.

6.3% below estimateindicative · n=1compared within CPV division 03
Largest published awards
i
AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
MFF162 Supply and delivery of sphagnum moss plugsPeak District National Park Authority8 Sept 20255.9 yrs£8,430,000
≈ £1.4m/yr
Supply and Delivery of Sphagnum Moss Plug PlantsPeak District National Park Authority——£3,400,000 †

Where their buyers are
i

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 4 of 4 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

East Midlands3 procedures · 75%
North East England1 procedure · 25%

Bidding record
i

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notice names this supplier since 27 May 2026 · observed bids, not an estimate

Contract lots contested
i
1 won · 0 lostindicative · n=1Fewer than three decided lots: no rate is claimed.
Authorities bid for
i
1

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
  • Other public body50%(3 awards)
    3 of 6 awards are Other public body (50%).
  • Local authority33%(2 awards)
    2 of 6 awards are Local authority (33%).
  • Type not classified17%(1 award)
    1 of 6 awards is Type not classified (17%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Peak District National Park Authorityframework/DPS on 1375%412 Apr 2026
Durham County Councilframework/DPS on 1125%211 Nov 2022

Share = of the 4 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

6 of 6 awards carry an end date · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
MFF163-01 2025-2031 Framework for the supply and delivery of moorland plug plants31 Mar 2027£230,000 ceiling

Recent awards

Latest 6 of 6 award records naming this supplier

About this data
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 6 of 6 awards, estimated from the published duration on 0 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.