Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Central governmentGreater LondonLondon

Websitemet.police.co.uk ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months90 in the prior 12 months
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Published award value, 24m£3.8mnet · on 9 of 9 published values · top 5 = 84%
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 9 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Contract100%(9 notices)
    9 of 9 notices are Contract (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Limited / restricted100%(9 notices)
    9 of 9 notices are Limited / restricted (100%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 9 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 9 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Softcat Plc222.2%22—
CGi (UK) Ltd111.1%11—
Police Digital Service111.1%11—
Computacenter (UK) Ltd111.1%11—
CDW Limited111.1%11—
MacMunnis Limited111.1%11—
GoodSAM111.1%11—
CGI IT UK Limited111.1%11—

9 awarded procedures across 8 suppliers: too few to describe concentration.

Published award value (24m)
i

How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.

Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.

Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.

£3.8mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 9 of 9 published single-supplier values; the five largest make 84%.
Typical single-supplier award (24m)
i

The middle published award value for this buyer.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

Last 24 months.

£250k middle valuerobust · n=9Middle half £149k–£589k.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

SupplierAwardedTermPublished value
Mobile video streaming, location services and tracking, licences and support.GoodSAM——£1,233,032 †
Corporate Data Warehouse, 3rd line licence support and maintenanceCGI IT UK Limited——£611,787 †
Corporate Logging of Intelligence (CLIO) software and supportComputacenter (UK) Ltd——£588,811 †
Corporate Data Warehouse - modernisation platform uplift 2026CGi (UK) Ltd——£491,612 †
Corporate Data Warehouse Infrastructure Upgrade and Backup and Recovery Platform RefreshSoftcat Plc——£249,766 †

Recent procedures

Latest 9 of 9 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Provision of Social Media licences and supportIT services: consultingAwarded / complete19 Jul 2026—
Corporate Data Warehouse Infrastructure Upgrade and Backup and Recovery Platform RefreshInformation systems or technology strategic review and planning servicesAwarded / complete21 Jun 2026—
Corporate Data Warehouse - modernisation platform uplift 2026IT services: consultingAwarded / complete21 Jun 2026—
TecSAFE application softwareInformation systems or technology strategic review and planning servicesAwarded / complete21 Jun 2026—
Corporate Logging of Intelligence (CLIO) software and supportIT services: consultingAwarded / complete21 Jun 2026—
Corporate Data Warehouse, 3rd line licence support and maintenanceIT services: consultingAwarded / complete25 May 2026—
Mobile video streaming, location services and tracking, licences and support.IT services: consultingAwarded / complete21 May 2026—
Experian Data SetIT services: consultingAwarded / complete21 May 2026—
Manhattan softwareIT services: consultingAwarded / complete21 May 2026—

Search all 9 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 0 of 9 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.