CTM Portal for the NDA Shared Services Alliance: Contract Register & Procurement Profile
North West England·Seascale
Find a Tender organisation id4524
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
19 awarded tenders, 27 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirion Technologies (CANBERRA UK) Ltd | 2 | 10.5% | 0 | 2 | — |
| Unitech Services Group Ltd | 1 | 5.3% | 0 | 2 | — |
| NSG Environmental Ltd | 1 | 5.3% | 0 | 1 | — |
| STULZ Modular Limited | 1 | 5.3% | 0 | 1 | — |
| Jacobs UK Ltd | 1 | 5.3% | 0 | 1 | — |
| Mott MacDonald | 1 | 5.3% | 0 | 1 | — |
| React Engineering Limited | 1 | 5.3% | 0 | 1 | — |
| Mitie Limited | 1 | 5.3% | 0 | 1 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 21% of 19 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 27 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
Recent procedures
Latest 50 of 53 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACADEMIC LITERATURE AND RESEARCH ACCESS FOR SELLAFIELD LTDJournals | Open | 5 Jul 2021 | £120,000 |
| 3D OR Business Modelling - Professional Services contractBusiness analysis consultancy services | Planned | 10 Jun 2021 | £4,500,000 |
| Reactor Void Water Diversion ProjectElectrical installation work of pumping equipment | Open | 3 Jun 2021 | £300,000 |
| Building Roof RefurbishmentRoof | Planned | 27 May 2021 | £15,200,000 |
| Provision of Apprentice ServicesEducation and training services | Planned | 11 May 2021 | £65,000,000 |
| Colleague DevelopmentAdult and other education services | Planned | 12 Apr 2021 | — |
| 32 Tonne Fork Lift truckForklift trucks | Open | 25 Mar 2021 | £250,000 |
| Manipulator refurbishment for area, WEP and MEPNuclear safety equipment | Planned | 9 Mar 2021 | £250,000 |
| Talent Assessment ApproachEducation and training services | Planned | 4 Mar 2021 | — |
| Lateral Flow TestingMedical consumables | Awarded / complete | 26 Feb 2021 | — |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 10 of 28 published contracts have an end date; 10 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.