Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 3 Feb 2026, 14:31 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Trading in parks-Soft market testing for flagship sites

Authority: Cheshire West and Chester Council (Local council)

ServicesBelow threshold
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 1 moends 23 Mar 2026 · starts 23 Feb 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Trading in parks-Soft market testing for flagship sites

Please find soft market document published on the chest.

www.the-chest.org.uk ↗

CPV: Recreational-area services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Planned 1 mo
Contract period: 23 Feb 2026 – 23 Mar 2026 (1 mo)
Delivery: North West

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Cheshire West and Chester Council buys Recreational-area services (CPV 9233), and who usually turns up

Cheshire West and Chester Council’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Recreational-area services (CPV 9233) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerCheshire West and Chester Council · all categories
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 80 of 106 known-size awards · market: CPV 9233 · UK-wide, n=10
75%60%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means the winner is registered in the region where that contract was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 85 of 166 known-location awards · market: CPV 9233 · UK-wide, n=10
51%90%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in North West England.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 10 decided notices · market: division 92 · North West England, n=12
54 days45 days

Half of these awards were announced within 54 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 82 of 167 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 9233 · UK-wide, n=13
49%38%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer14 lots with bid counts · all categories
0% had one bid
The market6 lots with bid counts · CPV 9233 · UK-wide
83% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid0% / 83%
Buyer: 0 of 14 lots with published bid counts. Market: 5 of 6 lots with published bid counts.
2–37% / 17%
Buyer: 1 of 14 lots with published bid counts. Market: 1 of 6 lots with published bid counts.
4–650% / 0%
Buyer: 7 of 14 lots with published bid counts. Market: 0 of 6 lots with published bid counts.
7+43% / 0%
Buyer: 6 of 14 lots with published bid counts. Market: 0 of 6 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer17 lots with estimate and award · all categories
12% below estimate
The market16 lots with estimate and award · division 92 · North West England
25% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate12% / 25%
Buyer: 2 of 17 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 4 of 16 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%71% / 56%
Buyer: 12 of 17 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 9 of 16 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate18% / 19%
Buyer: 3 of 17 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 3 of 16 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 92331 monthEstimate not published
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 22 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet9% single-bid risk
Past bids on 22 similar lots
1 bid9%
2 of 22 similar past lots received 1 bid (9%).
2–345%
10 of 22 similar past lots received 2–3 (45%).
4–636%
8 of 22 similar past lots received 4–6 (36%).
7+9%
2 of 22 similar past lots received 7+ (9%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 3 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
3 Feb 2026, 14:31 GMT
Last source update
3 Feb 2026, 14:31 GMT
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-009509
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Recreational-area services
Delivery area
North West (UKD)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06157d Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

3 Feb 2026 → 23 Feb 2026 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published259 days ago
    3 Feb 2026, 14:31 GMT
  2. Market engagement241 days ago
    20 Feb 2026, 23:59 GMT

    Trading in parks-Soft market testing for flagship sites

    Please find soft market document published on the chest.

    www.the-chest.org.uk ↗

  3. Contract starts239 days ago
    23 Feb 2026

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    3 Feb 2026, 14:31 GMT
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Cheshire West and Chester Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PCJB-2814-BHZP The Portal, Wellington Road, Ellesmere Port, North West, CH65 0BAContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure