Official UK procurement notice
Smoking support within Community Mental Health Teams
Authority: Bradford Metropolitan District Council (Local council)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionCity of Bradford Metropolitan District Council Public Health would like to commission a provider to support smokers to quit or reduce harm within 5 Community Mental Health Teams across Bradford and District under the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023 - Most Suitable Provider Process. Smoking is the biggest driver of inequalities and is far more common in people with a long-term mental health condition when compared to the general condition.
This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intended approach notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award.
The provider will employ two whole time equivalent smoking cessations advisors to support people to start their smokefree journey.
CPV: Health and social work services · Health services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intended approach noticePlanned
This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intended approach notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. This notice will be live for fourteen (14) days from the date of publication.
The intention is to award this contract using the most suitable provider process.
Justification to this approach
Smoking is the biggest driver of inequalities and is far common in people with a long-term mental health condition when compared to the general condition. Quitting smoking can aid recovery from mental breakdown thereby, reducing the risk of relapse and long hospital detentions. Furthermore, availability of cheap and illicit tobacco makes it difficult for people from disadvantaged and low-income backgrounds to quit, therefore it’s imperative that support is offered at regular points of treatment to keep patient’s smokefree journey on track..
A pathway into the LW service on discharge from hospital stay was established last year, however, this has been unsuccessful. Possible reasons for this include, staff capacity, lack of motivation and engagement with another service outside mental health. This proposal aims to overcome some of these barriers by taking the service to the target group. This is an opportunity to target large number of smokers within the mental health services and provide the support within their settings where trust and rapport has already been built.
Evidence suggests that integrated approaches that provide regular, structured opportunities for open discussions about the challenges of quitting smoking and can aid recovery. The proposed model will also provide staff with a better understanding of nicotine addiction and provide access to on-site level 2 stop smoking advisors to support the patient’s care plan. A 2016 survey of stop smoking practitioners found that practitioners from services that had a dedicated mental health lead were more confident in supporting smokers with different mental health conditions compared to practitioners within the local stop smoking services.
Contract Length and funding
This programme is to be funded initially for a period of 18 months with an option to extend for another 1 year subject to performance. The total value of this contract is £200,000 to cover 2 years and 6 months.
Essential criteria
•Provider must have access to an updated patients list under the care of 5 Community Mental Health Teams
•Provider must use Quit Manager to record all smoking outcomes
•Provider must have previous experience of providing smoking cessation support in a mental health setting
•Provider must provide leadership, governance and training to the 2 stop smoking advisors
Provider(s) wishing to express and interest and be considered for the Most suitable provider process must be registered on YORtender, and submit response via YORtender stating you would like to be considered. All expressions of interest must be submitted by 09:00 on Friday 09th January 2026. Additional information: This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intended approach notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 do not apply to this award. It is the intention to award a contract using the most suitable provider process
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
Health services (CPV 8510) in Yorkshire and the Humber, and who usually turns up
Bradford Metropolitan District Council has too little published record in this market to describe on its own. Published market evidence for the same work stands beside whatever it has. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Across this market, small firms won 56% of awards with a known supplier size.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in Yorkshire and the Humber.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Across this market, 53% of winners were registered in the delivery region.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 74 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Across this market, at least 73% of awarded procurements had no recorded rival.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid27%
2–340%
4–618%
7+15%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate35%
Within ±2%63%
Above estimate3%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intended approach noticeCPV 8510Published estimate£200k
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 62 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid27%
2–340%
4–618%
7+15%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 22 Dec 2025, 13:03 GMT
- Last source update
- 22 Dec 2025, 13:03 GMT
- Authority reference
CBMC-PTR-211-2025-26- FTS notice number
2025/S 000-085389- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-05fb87Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
22 Dec 2025 → 23 Jan 2026 · 2 dates- Notice published304 days ago22 Dec 2025, 13:03 GMT
- Tender notice expected272 days ago23 Jan 2026
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.