Official UK procurement notice
SEND Mediation and Disagreement Resolution Service
Authority: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (Local council)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionRotherham Borough Council (RBC) are running a single procurement process that will result in the commissioning of an impartial SEND Mediation and Disagreement Resolution Service.
1The Children and Families Act 2014 (the "Act"), Chapter 6 sets out requirements regarding appeals, mediation and disagreement resolution for children and young people in England with special educational needs or disabilities (SEND).
The Act was followed by the Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice 2015: 0 to 25 years. This Statutory Code of Practice sets out the guidance for organisations who work with and support children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities explaining their duties and responsibilities under Part 3 of the Act, details of the legal requirements that must be followed without exception and statutory guidance that must be followed by law (unless there is a legitimate reason not to).
Both the Act and Code of Practice outline:
- Early resolution of disagreements at a local level,
- Independent disagreement resolution arrangements which local authorities must make available for disagreements across special educational provision,
- Independent mediation arrangements which parents/carers and young people can use before deciding whether to appeal to the SEND First Tier Tribunal and for health and social care complaints in relation to Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs),
- Conditions for appealing to the Tribunal or making disability discrimination claims.
In addition, The Special Educational Needs and Disability Regulations 2014 set out in detail what is required by Local Authorities (LAs) for assessing the Education, Health and Care (EHC) needs of children and young people and, where necessary, drawing up EHC plans including the requirements regarding mediation and appeal.
In order to ensure strong quality standards the Service Provider must be a Registered Provider with the Civil Mediation Council and ensure that all Mediators are trained, qualified and experienced and must be included on the SEND Mediator Register.
The Service Provider must also provide a commitment to comply with any additional professional standards developed as a result of the SEND reforms.
The Service Provider will provide confidential, independent and impartial mediation advice and Mediation and Disagreement Resolution Service to Service Users within the Rotherham borough in order to assist the discharge of statutory obligations under the Act and the Code of Practice.
The Service Provider will ensure that the Service is:
- Independent, confidential and impartial to Service Users,
- Flexible yet cost effective, enabling Service Users to access the Service they need, when they need it. This Service should be a hybrid model with online mediation as the default.
In providing the Service the Service Provider must ensure that it, and its staff:
- Adhere to the agreed timetable throughout the process,
- Demonstrate trauma-informed, parent-centered practice,
- Seek feedback from Service Users to inform and influence service development as well as providing evidence of user satisfaction improvements,
- Tailor the Service to individual Service User needs and especially in reference to groups with protected characteristics as defined in the Equality Act 2010,
- Is a Civil Mediation Council (CMC) registered Provider and
- Use only Mediators registered with the CMC.
The current SEND reform programme and associated DfE policy development present a known risk which may necessitate future modifications of the contract. Whilst the final legislative and operational requirements are not yet fully defined, the reforms may result in changes to statutory mediation requirements, dispute resolution pathways, Individual Support Plan (ISP) arrangements, referral volumes, eligibility criteria, performance measures, reporting requirements, multi-agency working arrangements, and the respective responsibilities of Local Authorities, schools and health partners.
Consequently, the Council may need to modify the contract during its term to reflect changes in legislation, statutory guidance, service delivery models, demand levels or commissioning requirements arising from the national SEND reform programme. Any modifications would be limited to those necessary to maintain statutory compliance, service continuity and effective delivery of the SEND Mediation and Disagreement Resolution Service.
CPV: Social work and related services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1Published value£360,000
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published award criteria (3)
- Quality: Broken into further sub criteria: - Service Mobilisation (20%) - Service Model (15%) - Implementation of SEND Reforms (15%) - Outcomes and Evaluation (10%) - Information Governance (10%) - Evidence Gathering and Early Resolution (10%) - Inclusive Support (10%) - Workforce Skills and Leadership (5%) - Safeguarding (5%) Full details are included within the tender documentation.
- Social Value: Broken into the following criteria: - Quantitative Assessment (30%) - Qualitative Assessment (70%) Full details are included within the tender documentation.
- Price: Full details are included within the tender documentation.
No conditions of participation were published on the notice; check the tender documents.
- Price carries 20 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 2 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
- Turnover usually expected at this size: about £143,842 (twice the annual value).
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula. Turnover is an indicative market norm (≈2× annual value), not a published condition.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council buys Social work and related services (CPV 8530), and who usually turns up
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Social work and related services (CPV 8530) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in Yorkshire and the Humber.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside Yorkshire and the Humber.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 68 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid83% / 33%
2–317% / 40%
4–60% / 27%
7+0% / 0%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate25% / 9%
Within ±2%75% / 73%
Above estimate0% / 18%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 8530Published estimate£360k
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid42%
2–341%
4–610%
7+7%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
Based on 13 comparable awards. Each lot reflects its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Middle 50%£360k
Estimate£360k
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £4.1m11 awards in 36m · last 2 months ago | 3 live · £716k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=5 | |
| £7.5m8 awards in 36m · last 3 months ago | 2 live · £172k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 18% below n=2 | |
| £687k6 awards in 36m · last 5 months ago | 5 live · £675k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 20% below n=3 | |
| £3.5m11 awards in 36m · last this month | 10 live · £7.4m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=2 | |
| £7.7m6 awards in 36m · last 12 months ago | 1 live · £7.2m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 3% below n=4 |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Below threshold - open competition
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Below threshold
- Regulatory regime
- Light touch regime
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 24 Jun 2026, 16:33 BST
- Last source update
- 5 Oct 2026, 17:53 BST
- Authority reference
25-130- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-094014- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06bc87Find a Tender
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via EU-Supply (CTM)- Requests to participate (first stage)
- —
- Tender submission deadline
- 9 Nov 2026, 10:00 GMT
- Clarification deadline
- —
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
All tender responses must be made via yortender.eu-supply.com/login.asp ↗ - against project ref 100113166.
The responses made for this tender in relation to Social Value must be made via www.socialvalueportal.com/log-in ↗ - against project ref SI0-0000-4ZyWr
Timeline
24 Jun 2026 → 1 Apr 2027 · 5 dates- Planning notice published119 days ago24 Jun 2026, 16:33 BST
- Market engagement96 days ago17 Jul 2026, 23:59 BST
The Council would like to engage with the market for the purpose of the recommissioning of the SEND Mediation and Disagreement Resolution Service.
The Council will be hosting a market engagement event on Monday 6th July 2026 at 10.00am via Microsoft Teams.
If you are interested in attending the event you can do so by registering at YORtender (yortender.eu-supply.com/login.asp ↗) and searching for YORtender ID 100111801.
Once registered you will be able to download the service specification.
Please send a message via YORtender if you wish to attend the event, a Teams invite will then be issued.
The presentation at the event sets out the Local Authority's intentions ahead of a future procurement for SEND Mediation and Disagreement Resolution services. The purpose is to engage openly with potential providers, share strategic context, and shape a service model that delivers high-quality, independent, and trusted resolution for children, young people, and their families. This engagement is an opportunity to understand market capacity and test our specification before formal tendering begins.
Ultimately, the Local Authority's aim is to commission a service that families trust, professionals value, and which supports better outcomes for children and young people with SEND while making effective use of public resources.
- Tender notice published16 days ago5 Oct 2026, 17:53 BST
- Today22 Oct 2026
- Submission deadlinein 18 days9 Nov 2026, 10:00 GMT
- Contract startsin 161 days1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST
Notice history
5 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 24 Jun 2026- Preliminary market engagement notice published24 Jun 2026, 16:33 BSTUK2
- Tender notice published5 Oct 2026, 17:53 BSTUK4
- Status changed to active5 Oct 2026, 17:53 BST
- Procurement method changed5 Oct 2026, 17:53 BST
- Deadline published: 9 Nov 2026, 10:00 GMT5 Oct 2026, 17:53 BST
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (4)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Bidding documents and specifications All tender documentation can be accessed from the YORtender portal, after registering against project ref 100113166.
- Technical specifications All tender documentation can be accessed from the YORtender portal, after registering against project ref 100113166.
Notices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender