Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 19 May 2026, 10:48 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Provision of Behavioural Safety for Southern Region

Authority: NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (Central government)

Framework agreementServicesAbove thresholdUtilitiesSME suitableVCSE suitable
Sectors: Education & Training (80) Delivery: UK
Planned pipeline value£2,880,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 19 May 2026from the planned procurement notice
Framework period 3 yrsends 30 Sept 2029 · up to 30 Sept 2031 with extensions · starts 1 Oct 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The Behavioural Safety programme will provide real time, on-site coaching to improve behavioural safety, leadership, planning and productivity across Kent, Sussex, and Wessex routes. The aim is to reinforce safety culture, which is vital for reducing accidents, enhancing morale, increasing productivity, maintaining compliance, strengthening reputation and embedding continuous improvement that supports Network Rail’s value: Everyone Home Safe Every Day.

This procurement event aims to award to one supplier for the whole of the Southern Region. The region is made up of three routes: Kent, Sussex & Wessex. This framework will be available to Network Rail, High Speed Limited, Great British Railways, Department for Transport Operator Limited (DFTO), and their subsidiaries, successor organisations and affiliates.

The framework will be awarded for an initial term of 3 years, with options to extend by 2 years on two occasions (1+1), allowing for a total potential term of 5 years.

The indicative value of the framework over its total lifespan including extensions is estimated at £3.6M.

The following is the breakdown of the programme components and how it is to be supplied:

Component 1: Section Leadership and Work Planning Team Coaching

Sessions: 13 Days total

  • 1 x Kick-Off (Discovery & Planning) session
  • 6 x Coaching sessions with Section Management Team (SM, Planner, Administrator, Engineer)
  • 6 x Coaching sessions with Supervisors (3 each)

Focus Areas:

  • Section direction, planning, team dynamics, and resource utilisation.

Deliverables:

  • Individual Action Plans used as dynamic learning journals.
  • 1:1 post-programme review with line manager.
  • Session reviews logged in a Management Information System (MIS).

Component 2: Behavioural Safety Leadership for Team Leaders and Teams

Sessions: 12 Days total

  • 1 x Half-day HSC Brief per team
  • 3 x On-shift coaching sessions (Schedule of NR staff’s Week-day / Week-night shift) per team (up to 7 hours each)

Focus Areas:

  • Behavioural safety, SWP understanding, hazard identification, safety conversations, equipment management, situational awareness.

Deliverables:

  • Team SMART Action Plans.
  • 1:1 post-programme review with SM & Supervisor.
  • Evidence-based competency reviews.

CPV: Safety training services

How this framework works

From the published notice
Framework period
3 yrs · up to 5 yrs from 1 Oct 2026

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 3 yrsSMEVCSE
Contract period: 1 Oct 2026 – 30 Sept 2029 (3 yrs) · up to 30 Sept 2031 with extensions
Delivery: UKEligibility: SME eligibleVCSE eligible
Extensions: Extension options published

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add more
What this means for your bid
  • “Provision of Behavioural Safety for Southern Region” is a framework: the contest is a place on its panel, not a single contract.

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED buys Safety training services (CPV 8055), and who usually turns up

NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. This notice is a framework or DPS, so only frameworks and DPS are compared. Whole-market view: Safety training services (CPV 8055) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerNETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED · all categories
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 21 of 72 known-size awards · market: no supplier sizes published
29%—

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 2 of 8 known-location awards · market: no winner locations published
25%—

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside the delivery region.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 10 decided notices · market: no decision dates published
250 days—

Half of these awards were announced within 250 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The buyer’s share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 15 of 43 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: no bid counts or routes published
35%—

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer71 lots with bid counts · all categories
8% had one bid
The marketNo bid counts published
Buyer · select a colour for counts
1 bid8%
Buyer: 6 of 71 lots with published bid counts.
2–334%
Buyer: 24 of 71 lots with published bid counts.
4–648%
Buyer: 34 of 71 lots with published bid counts.
7+10%
Buyer: 7 of 71 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

On a framework or DPS, prices are agreed when work is called off.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

Not comparable on a framework or DPS. The notice sets up a supplier panel and a ceiling value; what the work actually costs is agreed later, on each call-off or mini-competition, and those publish as contract notices of their own. The award-vs-estimate record of this market therefore sits on the call-offs; this page shows it on the contracts, not on the panel that frames them.

2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 805536 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£2.9m
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 494 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet9% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 494 similar lots
1 bid9%
45 of 494 similar past lots received 1 bid (9%).
2–319%
94 of 494 similar past lots received 2–3 (19%).
4–621%
103 of 494 similar past lots received 4–6 (21%).
7+51%
252 of 494 similar past lots received 7+ (51%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 7 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Priced at call-off
On a framework or DPS the price is agreed on each call-off, so there is no award price to forecast here: the published figure is a ceiling.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Utilities
Commercial structure
Framework agreement
Who may use this agreement
Not stated in the notice; call-off rights may be limited to the establishing authority
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
19 May 2026, 10:48 BST
Last source update
19 May 2026, 10:48 BST
Authority reference
project_46366 - 43225
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-045658
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Safety training services
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-069baf Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Appointment period ends
—

Timeline

19 May 2026 → 1 Oct 2026 · 4 dates
  1. Planning notice published156 days ago
    19 May 2026, 10:48 BST
  2. Tender notice expected156 days ago
    19 May 2026, 23:59 BST
  3. Market engagement156 days ago
    19 May 2026, 23:59 BST

    Pre Market engagment:

    A Pre market engagement was carried out through RISQS - registered suppliers under the relevant RICCL codes.

    H.K.12.1.1 – Management and Leadership Skills / Services

    H.K.12.2 Health, Safety & Environment Training / Service

    A total of 137 suppliers were registered and were issued with a Microsoft Form questionnaire, which was sent on 26/03/2026 and requested to be completed by 02/04/2026.

    From the 137 suppliers issued the market engagement, 20 responses were received.

    Expression of Interest:

    135 suppliers were sent an Expression of Interest through RISQS on 28/04/2026.

    12 Suppliers expressed an interest and will be taking forward to ITT stage for this procurement event.

    Clarifications:

    No clarification questions have arisen at this time.

    Once the ITT stage is published, a clarification log will be setup where suppliers can provide their clarification questions through Bravo.

  4. Contract starts22 days ago
    1 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    19 May 2026, 10:48 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PNZN-9524-VCQJ Waterloo General Office, London, London, SE1 8SWContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure