Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 19 Aug 2026, 12:27 BST

Official UK procurement notice

OSINT Platforms · UK public procurement notice

Authority: The Police and Crime Commissioner for Surrey (Police & fire)

GoodsBelow thresholdSME suitable
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 yrsends 1 Nov 2029 · up to 1 Nov 2031 with extensions · starts 2 Nov 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The police and Crime Commissioner for Sussex and the Police and Crime Commissioner for Surrey are exploring the to understand providers of OSINT platforms capabilities and the ballpark pricing for the licencing.

The Force requires access to an OSINT platform capable of supporting digital investigations and intelligence development through the interrogation of publicly available online data.

Mandatory Requirements

  1. Identifier-Based Searches

The platform must provide the ability to conduct searches against telephone numbers, email addresses and usernames on a 24-hour, 365-day basis.

  1. Rich Account Attribution

The platform must provide results that extend beyond simple account details and, where available, return:

  • Account identifiers and user IDs.
  • Display names and usernames.
  • Profile biographies.
  • Profile and display images.
  • Partial password recovery indicators.
  • Account registration indicators.
  • Other publicly available attribution data.

Particular emphasis should be placed on the retrieval of platform-specific user IDs, as these are often static identifiers that remain unchanged even when usernames and display names are altered.

  1. International Coverage

The platform must support searches against both UK and international identifiers, including overseas telephone numbers, email providers and social networking platforms.

  1. Data Correlation and Cross Referencing

Results must be presented in a format that allows investigators to rapidly identify and cross-reference linked accounts. The ability to navigate directly between associated accounts and services is highly desirable and should minimise manual analytical effort.

  1. Platform Currency and Development

The supplier must demonstrate an active development programme that ensures:

  • Ongoing support for emerging social media platforms.
  • Continuous maintenance of existing platform integrations.
  • Rapid adaptation to platform changes.
  • Long-term resilience against changes introduced by social networking providers.

The Force requires assurance that temporary disruption caused by platform changes will be actively addressed and that functionality will be restored wherever technically and legally possible.

  1. Reporting and Evidential Preservation

The platform must allow results to be exported into a format suitable for evidential retention and intelligence recording.

PDF export functionality is considered highly desirable as it provides:

  • A permanent record of search results.
  • Ease of storage within Force systems.
  • Consistency for review and comparison purposes.
  1. Supplier Engagement

The Force requires direct engagement with the supplier's development and support teams. This should include mechanisms for requesting support for new platforms and discussing operational requirements as investigative needs evolve.

  1. Account Registration Intelligence

The ability to determine whether an identifier is registered with a service is considered highly valuable even when no further information is extractable. Such information is frequently used to inform investigative decision making and to support subsequent applications for legal process.

  1. Enhanced Intelligence Capability

The platform must provide a richer intelligence picture than can be obtained through conventional contact synchronisation techniques conducted via mobile devices or emulators. The Force requires broader platform coverage, greater depth of returned data and enhanced attribution opportunities.

  1. Wide number of users.

The solution should support deployment to a large user base without creating operational constraints through restrictive licensing arrangements. Bidders should demonstrate how their licensing model enables broad organisational access in a cost-effective and scalable manner, whilst maintaining appropriate governance, oversight and audit capability.

Responding:

If your organisation meets the above requirements and you would like to be sent the Request for Information document to complete, please email: [email protected] by 4pm on the 16th September 2026.

CPV: Communications network · Intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition and reconnaissance · Software package and information systems

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 3 yrsSME
Contract period: 2 Nov 2026 – 1 Nov 2029 (3 yrs) · up to 1 Nov 2031 with extensions
Delivery: South EastEligibility: SME eligible
Extensions: Extension options published

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How The Police and Crime Commissioner for Surrey buys Local area network (CPV 3241), and who usually turns up

The Police and Crime Commissioner for Surrey’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Local area network (CPV 3241) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bidWhat to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 16 of 47 known-size awards · market: CPV 3241 · South East England, n=9
34%0%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in South East England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 25 of 71 known-location awards · market: CPV 3241 · South East England, n=10
35%20%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside South East England.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 3 decided notices · market: CPV 3241 · UK-wide, n=7
57 days78 days

Half of these awards were announced within 57 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 76 of 86 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 3241 · South East England, n=12
88%50%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer4 lots with bid counts · all categories · too few to chart
The market9 lots with bid counts · CPV 3241 · UK-wide
0% had one bid
Market · select a colour for counts
1 bid0%
Market: 0 of 9 lots with published bid counts.
2–356%
Market: 5 of 9 lots with published bid counts.
4–633%
Market: 3 of 9 lots with published bid counts.
7+11%
Market: 1 of 9 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer3 lots with estimate and award · all categories · too few to chart
The market9 lots with estimate and award · CPV 3241 · UK-wide
44% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate44%
Market: 4 of 9 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%56%
Market: 5 of 9 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate0%
Market: 0 of 9 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 324136 monthsSME suitableEstimate not published
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 12 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet8% single-bid risk
Past bids on 12 similar lots
1 bid8%
1 of 12 similar past lots received 1 bid (8%).
2–333%
4 of 12 similar past lots received 2–3 (33%).
4–650%
6 of 12 similar past lots received 4–6 (50%).
7+8%
1 of 12 similar past lots received 7+ (8%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
19 Aug 2026, 12:27 BST
Last source update
19 Aug 2026, 12:27 BST
Authority reference
JPS3289
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-078940
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Communications networkIntelligence, surveillance, target acquisition and reconnaissanceSoftware package and information systems
Delivery area
South East (UKJ2)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06e77c Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

19 Aug 2026 → 2 Nov 2026 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published63 days ago
    19 Aug 2026, 12:27 BST
  2. Market engagement34 days ago
    16 Sept 2026, 23:59 BST

    If your organisation wishes to receive the Request for Information document to complete and return, please email [email protected] by 4pm on the 16th September 2026.

  3. Today
    21 Oct 2026
  4. Contract startsin 12 days
    2 Nov 2026

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    19 Aug 2026, 12:27 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

The Police and Crime Commissioner for Surrey

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PTBH-8315-RNZP PO Box 412, Guildford, South East, GU3 1YJContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure