Official UK procurement notice
Maternal, Newborn and Infant Clinical Outcome Review Programme / Perinatal Mortality Review Tool
Authority: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (Public body)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionthe Maternal Newborn and Infant Clinical Outcome Review Programme (MNI Corp) and the Perinatal Mortality Review Tool (PMRT) are going to be amalgamated into one contract.
Currently MNI Corp is delivered for publicly-funded care in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Jersey, Guernsey and Isle of Man, and PMRT is delivered for NHS-funded care in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland.
Due to the amalgamation of the projects the name of the project may change from premarket engagement to the tender going live.
The initial contract is anticipated to be for a period of 3 years, at a maximum total budget of up to £4,470,624 excl VAT and 5,364,748.80 with VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected. Due to the unknowns in advance of holding the premarket engagement session, it is currently expected that the extension value will be a 2 year pro rata of the core 3 year funding, estimated at £2,982,416 excluding VAT.
There is potential to include other Devolved Nations and/or Crown Dependencies, and aspirational measures (which will be defined in the service specification).
In the UK, maternity care is generally safe and the vast majority of women and babies experience positive outcomes. However, when things go wrong, the impact can be devastating, and the death of a mother or baby during pregnancy, birth or the postnatal period is a life-changing event for families.
Around 200 women a year will die during pregnancy or in the year following pregnancy from causes related to or aggravated by pregnancy. Although maternal mortality in the UK remains relatively low, the maternal mortality rate in the UK exceeds that of many European counterparts. Significant inequalities also persist, with maternal mortality rates remaining disproportionately higher among some ethnic minority groups and women living in areas of greater deprivation.
In relation to perinatal mortality (stillbirths and neonatal deaths) thousands of families across the UK are affected each year. While rates of perinatal mortality have reduced over time, significant inequalities in outcomes remain, with babies born to women and families experiencing health inequalities continuing to face higher risks of adverse outcomes. This suggests there remains considerable opportunity for improvement.
The UK is one of only a small number of countries with an established national system for reviewing maternal and perinatal deaths. Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths have been undertaken since the 1950s, with the programme expanding in the 1990s to include perinatal mortality. The overarching aim of the programme is to support safe, equitable, high-quality and patient-centred maternal, newborn and infant care.
The programme undertakes national surveillance of maternal and perinatal deaths across the UK and conducts confidential enquiries to identify opportunities to improve care and reduce preventable deaths and serious complications. Findings from the programme, including evidence relating to socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities, provide critical intelligence to support national policy, quality improvement and the monitoring of government ambitions and targets relating to maternity and neonatal outcomes.
The overarching aim of the programme is to support improvements in the quality and safety of maternity and neonatal care by enabling clinicians, managers, commissioners and policy makers to learn systematically from maternal and perinatal deaths and serious adverse outcomes. A core focus of the programme is to support reductions in inequalities and disparities in outcomes relating to ethnicity, deprivation and other characteristics.
The scope of the programme is also expected to include the ongoing delivery and development of the Perinatal Mortality Review Tool (PMRT), a national standardised review tool designed to support high-quality perinatal mortality reviews across NHS maternity and neonatal services in the UK. The PMRT supports structured local review, national learning and parental engagement following stillbirths and neonatal deaths and is intended to align with and complement the wider maternal and perinatal surveillance and confidential enquiry functions of the programme.
The successful provider will be expected to deliver the programme in collaboration with commissioners, funders, clinicians, women and families, professional bodies and wider stakeholders. The provider will be expected to demonstrate robust methodological and analytical expertise, effective stakeholder engagement and the ability to translate findings into national learning and improvement activity that supports safer, more equitable maternity and neonatal care.
CPV: Health services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1PlannedRenewal
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
No small-firm winners recorded among this authority’s published awards in this sample.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in Greater London (authority’s region).
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
No winner locations published for this authority. Local means a registered address in Greater London.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 81 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid100% / 28%
2–30% / 29%
4–60% / 26%
7+0% / 18%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate36%
Within ±2%56%
Above estimate8%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 8510Published estimate£4.5m
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 80 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid28%
2–329%
4–626%
7+18%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTEREarlier contract | Mental Health Clinical Outcome Review Programmenotice published Jun 2024 | — | £2.0m | Matched as the earlier contract |
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 19 May 2026, 11:50 BST
- Last source update
- 19 May 2026, 11:50 BST
- Authority reference
HQIP CORP 1010111849- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-045688- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Not published
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-069bc0Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
19 May 2026 → 1 Oct 2027 · 4 dates- Planning notice published154 days ago19 May 2026, 11:50 BST
- Market engagement117 days ago24 Jun 2026, 23:59 BST
Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) is seeking to engage with the market on the recommissioning of the Maternal, Newborn and Infant Clinical Outcome Review Programme / Perinatal Mortality Review Tool.
The Authority is looking to build on the successes of the existing services currently contracted with the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford.
Further details of the current programme can be found at www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk ↗ and www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk/pmrt ↗.
HQIP will be looking to hold a pre-market engagement session with potential suppliers on Wednesday 1st July 2026 from 13.00hrs to 15.00hrs
Also in attendance will be system partners and service specialists including charities.
The aim of the pre market engagement session is for interested parties to hear and contribute to discussions with system experts and patient groups that will feed in to HQIP’s final decisions on the scope of the programme during this next contract period, and the anticipated outcomes over the 3-5 years of the programme.
The existing specifications are available for review by any interested parties and whilst it will provide information on how the current programme was scoped, it is important to understand that the recommissioning of this programme may amend the requirements.
At this point, the Authority is planning to run this procurement under an open tender process.
The proposed dates (subject to change solely at the Authorities discretion) are as follows:
1st July 2026 - Pre Market Engagement Session
Publication of tender opportunity – November 2026
Evaluation of submitted bids – December 2026 - January 2027
Award – April 2027
Contract start - 1st October 2027
If you would like to join this premarket engagement event, please complete the following Microsoft form:
forms.cloud.microsoft/e/MP3HhZ0C91 ↗ by close of business Wednesday 17th June 2026.
- Today20 Oct 2026
- Tender notice expectedin 16 days4 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 346 days1 Oct 2027, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published19 May 2026, 11:50 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender