Official UK procurement notice
Lightning Protection Risk Assessments
Authority: BD Group (Public body)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionBD Management Services Ltd, an ALMO of the The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (LBBD), wants to commission a suitably qualified contractor to undertake comprehensive lightning protection risk assessments across LBBD's residential property portfolio. This initiative ensures resident safety, infrastructure resilience, and compliance with the latest statutory standards.
The portfolio includes approximately 743 blocks across the borough that are three stories or above, including all High-Rise Buildings (HRB) and sheltered blocks.
Scope of Works:
On-site evaluations and data collection to inform risk calculations. Key requirements include:
Standard Compliance: All assessments must be conducted in accordance with BS EN IEC 62305 2:2024.
Risk Evaluation: Calculations must include the following risk categories:
R1: Risk of loss of human life.
R2: Risk of loss of service to the public.
R3: Risk of loss of cultural heritage.
R4: Risk of economic loss.
Existing System Assessment: Where Lightning Protection Systems (LPS) already exist, their condition and compliance with current standards must be evaluated.
Technical Tools: to utilize industry-recognized software, such as Furse’s StrikeRisk or an equivalent, for accurate risk modelling.
Deliverables
A comprehensive report is required for each building, containing:
Summary of findings and risk assessment results.
Evaluation of existing LPS (if applicable).
Actionable recommendations for new or upgraded systems.
Full compliance documentation aligned with BS EN IEC 62305 standards.
Costed Remedials: A detailed cost breakdown for all identified remedial works required to achieve
compliance.
A detailed Programme of Works will be required that outlines all key milestones and proposed deliverables, including specific dates for site attendance and survey completion.
To ensure project alignment, regular attendance at performance review meetings with the Client throughout the duration of the programme is required. Furthermore, it shall be a core obligation to proactively identify and highlight any risks that may impact the timeline, providing mitigation strategies to prevent failures in meeting the agreed schedule.
Project Constraints and Regulations
Resident Considerations: Residents will remain in their homes; surveys must be conducted with minimal disruption.
Regulatory Framework: Works must adhere to the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, Building Safety Act 2022, and Management Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015), among others.
Regulatory Compliance & Safety Standards
All works are to be executed in strict accordance with the following:
UK statutory requirements and industry best practices. Failure to adhere to these regulations will be considered a breach of contract.
Working at Height Regulations 2005 - Given that 763 blocks are 3 stories or above (including High-Rise Buildings), compliance with the Work at Height Regulations 2005 is paramount:
Risk Assessment: A specific Working at Height Risk Assessment and Method Statement (RAMS) shall be required to
be submitted and approved before any site surveys commence.
Hierarchy of Control: Contractors must demonstrate how they have applied the hierarchy of control (Avoid, Prevent, Mitigate) to minimize the risk of falls.
Equipment & Competence: All access equipment (e.g., MEWPs, scaffolding, or roof access systems) must be appropriately inspected (PUWER/LOLER), and personnel must hold valid certifications (e.g., IPAF, PASMA, or specialist roof safety training).
Electricity at Work Regulations 1989 (EAWR)
LPS is considered an electrical "system" under Regulation 6 of the EAWR.
Safety of Systems: All existing and proposed systems must be designed and maintained to prevent danger (including fire and shock) resulting from natural phenomena like lightning.
Continuity & Testing: Contractors must ensure that all testing of earth electrodes and conductors is conducted by "competent persons" to prevent danger to the surveyor or residents.
Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM)
The risk assessment and any subsequent remedial works fall under CDM 2015:
Duty Holder Responsibilities: The contractor will act as the "Principal Contractor" or "Contractor" (as
defined by project scale) and must ensure a Construction Phase Plan is in place where applicable.
Health and Safety File: All survey data, photographic evidence of non-compliance, and remedial
designs must be formatted for easy inclusion in the building’s permanent Health and Safety File.
BS EN IEC 62305:2024 Compliance
This is the primary standard for the design and testing of LPS in the UK.
Contractors must specifically reference Part 2 (Risk Management) for the assessments and Part 3 (Physical Damage) for any remedial recommendations.
Responses must include a commitment to using calibrated testing equipment that meets the accuracy requirements of this standard.
Building Safety Act 2022
For the High-Rise Buildings (HRB) within this portfolio, the contractor must provide documentation that supports the "Golden Thread" of information. Risk assessments must be robust enough to satisfy the Building Safety Regulator (BSR) that lightning risks have been managed to "as low as reasonably practicable" (ALARP).
For more information about this opportunity, please visit the eSourcing portal at:
www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-Dagenh… ↗
To respond to this opportunity, please click here:
CPV: Lightning conductors · Lightning-conductor installation work · Lightning-protection equipment · Technical inspection and testing services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How BD Group buys Technical inspection and testing services (CPV 7163), and who usually turns up
BD Group’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Technical inspection and testing services (CPV 7163) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in Greater London.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in Greater London.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 55 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid10%
2–340%
4–620%
7+30%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate50%
Within ±2%17%
Above estimate33%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 7163Published estimate£200k
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 10 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid10%
2–340%
4–620%
7+30%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 15 Apr 2026, 15:42 BST
- Last source update
- 15 Apr 2026, 15:42 BST
- Authority reference
BDMS-124.25- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-034339- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-068350Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
15 Apr 2026 → 8 Jun 2026 · 3 dates- Planning notice published188 days ago15 Apr 2026, 15:42 BST
- Market engagement174 days ago29 Apr 2026, 23:59 BST
BDMS is seeking a response from suppliers so engagement may be held with suppliers, via Teams, to understand the level of interest for its requirements before a tender is issued.
If you are interested in this requirement please email Sam Woolvett at [email protected] by noon on 29th April 2026. One to One Team's meetings may be held following EoI received.
- Contract starts135 days ago8 Jun 2026, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published15 Apr 2026, 15:42 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender