Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 19 Jan 2026, 17:10 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

IT Asset Management Software Pre Market Engagement

Authority: Liverpool City Region Combined Authority (Local council)

GoodsBelow thresholdSME suitable
Planned pipeline value£36,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 6 Feb 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 2 yrsends 31 Mar 2028 · starts 1 Apr 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

LCRCA IT currently uses the Certero Unified Asset Management Solution to manage IT assets including hardware, software, and licensing. This system has been in place for over 10 years and extended beyond its originally approved term. While it provides valuable insights particularly around Microsoft licensing compliance the IT environment has evolved, with cloud services and SaaS assets becoming increasingly important.

To remain compliant with public sector procurement rules and to ensure best practice in IT Asset Management (ITAM), a procurement exercise is required. The current Certero contract is due to end in July 2025, but a one-year extension has been approved (via DD) to allow sufficient time to identify and procure the most suitable solution.

CPV: Software package and information systems

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Planned 2 yrsSME
Contract period: 1 Apr 2026 – 31 Mar 2028 (2 yrs)
Delivery: North WestEligibility: SME eligible

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Liverpool City Region Combined Authority buys Software package and information systems (CPV 48), and who usually turns up

Liverpool City Region Combined Authority’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Software package and information systems (CPV 48) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerLiverpool City Region Combined Authority · all categories
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 37 of 67 known-size awards · market: division 48 · North West England, n=452
55%33%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in North West England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 42 of 93 known-location awards · market: division 48 · North West England, n=581
45%12%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside North West England.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 11 decided notices · market: division 48 · North West England, n=44
63 days56 days

Half of these awards were announced within 63 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 30 of 88 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 48 · North West England, n=697
34%67%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer28 lots with bid counts · all categories
21% had one bid
The market61 lots with bid counts · division 48 · North West England
13% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid21% / 13%
Buyer: 6 of 28 lots with published bid counts. Market: 8 of 61 lots with published bid counts.
2–343% / 26%
Buyer: 12 of 28 lots with published bid counts. Market: 16 of 61 lots with published bid counts.
4–621% / 36%
Buyer: 6 of 28 lots with published bid counts. Market: 22 of 61 lots with published bid counts.
7+14% / 25%
Buyer: 4 of 28 lots with published bid counts. Market: 15 of 61 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer16 lots with estimate and award · all categories
44% below estimate
The market35 lots with estimate and award · division 48 · North West England
54% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate44% / 54%
Buyer: 7 of 16 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 19 of 35 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%13% / 23%
Buyer: 2 of 16 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 8 of 35 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate44% / 23%
Buyer: 7 of 16 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 8 of 35 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #124 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£36k
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 61 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet13% single-bid risk
Past bids on 61 similar lots
1 bid13%
8 of 61 similar past lots received 1 bid (13%).
2–326%
16 of 61 similar past lots received 2–3 (26%).
4–636%
22 of 61 similar past lots received 4–6 (36%).
7+25%
15 of 61 similar past lots received 7+ (25%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £36k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
19 Jan 2026, 17:10 GMT
Last source update
19 Jan 2026, 17:10 GMT
Authority reference
DN803508
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-004533
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Software package and information systems
Delivery area
North West (UKD72)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-060944 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

19 Jan 2026 → 1 Apr 2026 · 4 dates
  1. Planning notice published275 days ago
    19 Jan 2026, 17:10 GMT
  2. Market engagement261 days ago
    2 Feb 2026, 23:59 GMT
    • The Expression of Interest (EOI) stage is intended to identify suppliers who wish to participate in this PME and progress to the next stage of the procurement process. Suppliers interested in responding are required to opt in to the project via the Proactis portal.
    • As part of the EOI, suppliers must submit a high-level overview of their proposed software solution, together with an indicative overview of costings. All information must be submitted exclusively through the Proactis portal. Submissions provided outside of the portal will not be considered.
    • There is no formal evaluation or moderation undertaken during the EOI stage. The information provided will be used solely to confirm supplier interest and suitability to progress.
    • Following completion of the EOI stage, the project team will notify selected suppliers via the Proactis portal and formally invite them to participate in the next stage of the process, the Request for Quotation (RFQ).

    To register or respond to this future tender opportunity you will need to log into your proactis account portal. Or if you are not part of this portal please register your company details at procontract.due-north.com/SupplierRegistration… ↗

  3. Tender notice expected257 days ago
    6 Feb 2026, 23:59 GMT
  4. Contract starts204 days ago
    1 Apr 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    19 Jan 2026, 17:10 GMT
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Liverpool City Region Combined Authority

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PNDZ-8253-CJJM 1 Mann Island, Liverpool, North West, L3 1BPContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure