Official UK procurement notice
DHSC: Supplier assurance information session for Social Care case management systems
Authority: Department of Health & Social Care (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionPurpose of this notice
The Department for Education (DfE) and the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) are inviting current and prospective suppliers of adults’ and children’s social care case management systems (CMSs) to participate in an information session.
The session will outline the government’s plans to explore a Catalogue Agreement as the assurance mechanism for the data and interoperability standards being developed through the adults’ and children’s social care Data Standards Programme (standard.socialcaredata.io ↗). It will explain why this approach is being considered, how the Catalogue Agreement is expected to operate in practice, and how suppliers can engage as the model develops.
About the Data Standards Programme
DfE and DHSC recognise the critical role that CMSs play in supporting the delivery of adult and children’s social care across local authorities. Engagement with local authorities, suppliers, and wider sector partners, has identified opportunities to strengthen how information is structured, shared and used both within and across the relevant organisations.
Building on existing work, including the Foundational Specification (www.bettergov.co.uk/blog/2025/09/foundat… ↗) published last year, and through close alignment with other national data and information-sharing initiatives, DfE and DHSC are working to support local authorities and suppliers in realising these opportunities through a Data Standards Programme.
DfE and DHSC are working with Social Finance (www.socialfinance.org.uk/impact/closing-the-d… ↗), the Open Data Institute and Coram to deliver the Data Standards programme. The programme aim is to develop a core set of data and interoperability standards for social care CMSs to support more joined-up ways of working, improve the flow of information between systems, and promote greater consistency across the whole sector.
When implemented at scale, these standards are intended to:
- Enable earlier intervention by helping practitioners access the right information at the right time, including where information is held across multiple systems.
- Improve people’s experience of social care by supporting access to accurate and up-to-date information across organisations, improving the safety and quality of care, and reducing the need for people to repeat their stories.
- Improve analytics and decision-making by enabling better use of data to support planning, insight and decision-making locally and nationally.
About the Catalogue Agreement
The Digital Services Integrated Care (DSIC) Catalogue Agreement is a formal agreement between government and suppliers that sets out the responsibilities and commitments of both parties. It provides a structured approach to implementing standards, assuring supplier solutions, and maintaining a roadmap for future requirements.
For the Data Standards Programme, DfE and DHSC are exploring this approach as the assurance mechanism for data and interoperability standards. The Catalogue Agreement could provide a structured route for suppliers to demonstrate alignment with agreed requirements and support a consistent approach to standards adoption across the sector.
This approach is already used across parts of the NHS and adult social care (including GP IT and Digital Social Care Records). As an established model, it provides a familiar and transparent framework for supplier engagement, standards assurance and ongoing management of future requirements.
CPV: Administrative social services · IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support · Information systems or technology strategic review and planning services · Information technology services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Department of Health & Social Care buys Systems and technical consultancy services (CPV 7222), and who usually turns up
Department of Health & Social Care’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Systems and technical consultancy services (CPV 7222) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Greater London (authority’s region).
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 65 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid20% / 5%
2–340% / 37%
4–620% / 42%
7+20% / 16%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate50% / 38%
Within ±2%50% / 44%
Above estimate0% / 19%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 7222No real estimate
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 19 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid5%
2–337%
4–642%
7+16%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 23 Oct 2026, 15:37 BST
- Last source update
- 23 Oct 2026, 15:37 BST
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-100663- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Not published
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-078f69Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
23 Oct 2026 → 24 Nov 2026 · 3 dates- Planning notice published1 day ago23 Oct 2026, 15:37 BST
- Today25 Oct 2026
- Contract startsin 23 days17 Nov 2026
- Market engagementin 31 days24 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
Engagement process description
This session provides an opportunity for suppliers to learn about and provide feedback on the departments' exploration of a Catalogue Agreement as the assurance mechanism for social care data standards. It will be delivered as an online webinar featuring presentations from representatives of DfE, DHSC, NHS England and Social Finance, followed by a live question-and-answer discussion.
It is open to organisations that currently supply, or may be interested in supplying, case management systems for adults’ or children’s social care. We look forward to working collaboratively with suppliers as this work progresses.
Registration
Date: Tuesday 24th November
Time: 10-11:30am
Format: Online webinar
Registration route: Please register via link: Supplier assurance information session: social care case management systems | techUK (www.techuk.org/events/supplier-assu… ↗)
Participation suitability
The session is open to organisations that currently supply, or may be interested in supplying, case management systems for adults' or children's social care.
Participation or non-participation in this engagement will not advantage or disadvantage any supplier in relation to any future commercial process. DfE and DHSC may publish, or otherwise make available, relevant information arising from the engagement to support fair and transparent market access.
Organisations wishing to participate are invited to register using the link provided above. Registration requests will only be accepted via the registration link; the email address below should not be used to register for the session.
If you would like to submit a question for consideration by the department and its partners ahead of the session, we would welcome these by 17th November. Please send any questions to the following email address: [email protected]
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published23 Oct 2026, 15:37 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender