Official UK procurement notice
Cash and Carry for Y&S staff shops
Authority: York and Scarborough Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (Central government)
What is being bought3 lots · detail below
Published requirement descriptionLOT 1 = York Hospital
LOT 2 = Scarborough Hospital
Suppliers can bid for one or both LOTS
The Trust will look for the top two suppliers with each LOT.
- The authority expects to re-tender this requirement around 9 Jun 2026, 23:59 BST.
CPV: Confectionery · Potato snacks · Rusks and biscuits; preserved pastry goods and cakes · Sweet biscuits
Lots and requirements (3)Procurement structure
3 lots · no lot values published · a supplier may bid for at most 2 and win at most 2 of them · same conditions of participation on every lot · same evaluation weights on every lotLot #1YorkPlannedRenewal
LOT 1 Delivery to York Staff Shop YO31 8HE
- Economic & financial standing
DUNS check will be carried out.
- Technical & professional ability
Must meet ALL Pass / Fail requirements and score a minimum of 85% as a total score - subject to internal review.
Lot #2ScarboroughPlannedRenewal
LOT 2 - delivery to Scarborough Staff Shop - YO12 6QL
- Economic & financial standing
DUNS check will be carried out.
- Technical & professional ability
Must meet ALL Pass / Fail requirements and score a minimum of 85% as a total score - subject to internal review.
Lot #3YORK & SCARBOROUGHPlannedRenewal
Both YORK & SCARBOROUGH
- Economic & financial standing
DUNS check will be carried out.
- Technical & professional ability
Must meet ALL Pass / Fail requirements and score a minimum of 85% as a total score - subject to internal review.
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published award criteria (3)
- Quality: This will make up 40% of the total score
- Price: Price will make up 50% of the overall score
- Social Value: Social Value will make up 10% of the overall score
- Economic & financial standing
DUNS check will be carried out.
- Technical & professional ability
Must meet ALL Pass / Fail requirements and score a minimum of 85% as a total score - subject to internal review.
- Price carries 50 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 5 points. This one is won on the number: sharpen the price before polishing the prose.
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula.
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How York and Scarborough Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust buys Rusks and biscuits; preserved pastry goods and cakes (CPV 1582), and who usually turns up
York and Scarborough Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Rusks and biscuits; preserved pastry goods and cakes (CPV 1582) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Yorkshire and the Humber.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 44 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid0% / 25%
2–329% / 25%
4–643% / 35%
7+29% / 15%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate20%
Within ±2%67%
Above estimate13%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1YorkCPV 15Estimate not published
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 15. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 20 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid25%
2–325%
4–635%
7+15%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
Lot #2ScarboroughCPV 15Estimate not published
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 15. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 20 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid25%
2–325%
4–635%
7+15%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
Lot #3YORK & SCARBOROUGHCPV 15Estimate not published
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 15. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 20 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid25%
2–325%
4–635%
7+15%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Goods
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Yes · next expected 9 Jun 2026
- First published
- 28 Apr 2026, 10:42 BST
- Last source update
- 5 May 2026, 14:38 BST
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end – 31 Jul 2026
- Authority reference
C442831- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-041097- Latest notice
- Planned procurement notice (UK3)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-068c53Find a Tender- Contract terms summary
Monthly
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- 10 Jul 2026, 12:00 BST
- Clarification deadline
- 2 Jul 2026, 16:00 BST
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Via ATAMIS only
Timeline
28 Apr 2026 → 1 Oct 2026 · 8 dates- Planning notice published179 days ago28 Apr 2026, 10:42 BST
- Latest notice published171 days ago5 May 2026, 14:38 BST
- Market engagement155 days ago21 May 2026, 23:59 BST
Publish UK2 and potentially speak to incumbent suppliers
- Tender notice expected137 days ago8 Jun 2026, 23:59 BST
- Clarification questions by113 days ago2 Jul 2026, 16:00 BST
- Submission deadline106 days ago10 Jul 2026, 12:00 BST
- Award decision expected by84 days ago31 Jul 2026, 23:59 BST
- Contract starts23 days ago1 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
Notice history
5 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 28 Apr 2026- Preliminary market engagement notice published28 Apr 2026, 10:42 BSTUK2
- Planned procurement notice published5 May 2026, 14:38 BSTUK3
- Status changed to planned5 May 2026, 14:38 BST
- Procurement method changed5 May 2026, 14:38 BST
- Deadline published: 10 Jul 2026, 12:00 BST5 May 2026, 14:38 BST
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Planned procurement notice Planned procurement notice on Find a Tender
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender