Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 14 Jul 2026, 17:03 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Case Notes Transcription & Summarisation Tool

Authority: Essex County Council (Local council)

Services
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 2 yrsends 1 Jun 2029 · starts 2 Jun 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Essex County Council (ECC) is seeking to explore how artificial intelligence can support Adult Social Care practice by transcribing and summarising practitioner and resident conversations. The work forms part of ECC's wider Pioneering AI programme, established to identify safe, ethical, and effective use of AI across the organisation. ECC has previously undertaken a proof of concept for this requirement that responded to significant pressures within Adult Social Care, including rising demand, workforce shortages, increasing case complexity, and a high administrative burden associated with recording case notes, which reduces time available for direct work with residents.

Wider Roll Out Project: A pilot has been undertaken as part of ECC's AI Transcription and Summarisation Proof of Concept to test the use of AI tools in supporting Adult Social Care practice by transcribing and summarising practitioner conversations. At this point, ECC aims through potential future procurement and strategic decision making to scale this capability across Adult Social Care, selecting an appropriate mix of specialist tools and Microsoft capabilities, to deliver improved efficiency, consistent high quality case recording, and sustainable, compliant AI adoption at scale.

The objective of this market engagement survey is to inform any future procurement process and assess if this market is viable, understanding whether AI tools and capabilities can reduce recording time, improve the quality and consistency of case notes, enhance practitioner and resident experience, and provide a clear evidence base and governance model for scaling AI safely and responsibly within high-risk statutory social care contexts.

The following requirements are necessary:

  1. Transcription Capability: The solution must support the accurate capture and transcription of conversations across a range of operational settings. This market engagement survey seeks to answer what transcription accuracy levels can be achieved; how the tool handles multiple speakers, overlapping conversations, accents, background noise, telephone calls and whether there is functionality for diverse language support.
  2. AI summarisation Capability: The solution must generate structured summaries from conversations to support operational case recording and decision-making. This market engagement survey seeks to answer how summaries are generated; if summary outputs can be configured to align with service specific templates; how the tool would minimise/eliminate omissions of critical information and if outputs can be customised for different business processes and service areas.
  3. Human oversight and quality assurance: The solution must support human review and validation of AI-generated outputs. This market engagement survey seeks to answer how users can review, edit and approve outputs; how the tool would support correction of errors; how changes can be applied across transcripts and summaries and the quality assurance mechanisms.
  4. Security, privacy and information governance: The solution must satisfy public sector requirements for handling sensitive personal information. This market engagement survey seeks to answer how customer data is stored and processed, whether UK data residency is available, what certifications are held (ISO27001, Cyber Essentials Plus etc.), how is data encrypted in transit and at rest and also how is access controlled and monitored and how the solution supports GDPR compliance.
  5. Auditability, transparency and responsible AI: The solution must be able to monitor usage and consumption by User Groups and dates, providing transparency, traceability and governance controls appropriate for high-risk public sector use cases. This market engagement survey seeks to answer what audit trails are available, how all user actions, AI outputs and changes can be logged as well as what mechanisms exist for monitoring biases, fairness and accuracy and how the tool supports challenge, redress and investigation.
  6. Accessibility and Inclusion: The solution must be accessible to a diverse workforce and service user population. This market engagement survey seeks to answer if the tool would meet inclusion and accessibility standards, what accessibility features are available, how the tool may support neurodiverse users and if the solution would support screen readers and voice inputs.
  7. Integration and interoperability: The solution must integrate with existing and future ECC technology environments. This Market Engagement Survey seeks to answer what integrations are currently available and if the summaries can be exported or copied into third party systems. Additionally, we are seeking to understand if APIs are available and if the tool can integrate with M365, Teams, case management systems and other telephony platforms.
  8. Operational resilience and reliability: The solution must be reliable in both office-based and community-based settings including device compatibility and the ability to use own devices. This Market Engagement Survey seeks to answer what service availability levels are provided, what disaster recovery arrangements exist, how the tool handles interrupted recordings and what support exists for offline working and low bandwidth environments.
  9. Scalability and enterprise adoption: The solution must support deployment across multiple services and large user populations. This market engagement survey seeks to answer how the tool scales, how user onboarding, training and support are delivered as well as what usage analytic and adoption metrics are available.
  10. Commercial model and total cost of ownership: ECC requires a sustainable and transparent commercial model to meet our requirements. This market engagement survey seeks to answer what pricing model is used (license, usage, consumption, transaction or hybrid), what the structure of implementation and ongoing support is and if there are any constraints on users, recordings or storage.

CPV: IT software package · Information technology services · Miscellaneous software package and computer systems · Voice recognition software package

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Essex County Council buys Systems and technical consultancy services (CPV 7222), and who usually turns up

Essex County Council’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Systems and technical consultancy services (CPV 7222) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerEssex County Council · division 72
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 8 of 14 known-size awards · market: CPV 7222 · East of England, n=38
57%66%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in East of England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 3 of 25 known-location awards · market: CPV 7222 · East of England, n=58
12%19%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside East of England.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 41 decided notices · market: CPV 7222 · East of England, n=5
47 days43 days

Half of these awards were announced within 47 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 15 of 27 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 7222 · East of England, n=61
56%54%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 72
0% had one bid
The market7 lots with bid counts · CPV 7222 · East of England
14% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid0% / 14%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 1 of 7 lots with published bid counts.
2–320% / 14%
Buyer: 1 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 1 of 7 lots with published bid counts.
4–640% / 29%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 2 of 7 lots with published bid counts.
7+40% / 43%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 3 of 7 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer58 lots with estimate and award · all categories
38% below estimate
The market95 lots with estimate and award · CPV 7222 · UK-wide
41% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate38% / 41%
Buyer: 22 of 58 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 39 of 95 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%55% / 45%
Buyer: 32 of 58 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 43 of 95 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate7% / 14%
Buyer: 4 of 58 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 13 of 95 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 722224 monthsEstimate not published
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 46 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet9% single-bid risk
Past bids on 46 similar lots
1 bid9%
4 of 46 similar past lots received 1 bid (9%).
2–322%
10 of 46 similar past lots received 2–3 (22%).
4–643%
20 of 46 similar past lots received 4–6 (43%).
7+26%
12 of 46 similar past lots received 7+ (26%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
14 Jul 2026, 17:03 BST
Last source update
14 Jul 2026, 17:03 BST
Authority reference
D147PA
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-066461
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
IT software packageInformation technology servicesMiscellaneous software package and computer systemsVoice recognition software package
Delivery area
East of England (UKH)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06cb5e Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

14 Jul 2026 → 2 Jun 2027 · 3 dates
  1. Planning notice published99 days ago
    14 Jul 2026, 17:03 BST
  2. Market engagement84 days ago
    28 Jul 2026, 23:59 BST

    The objective of this market engagement survey is to inform any future procurement process and assess if this market is viable, understanding whether AI tools and capabilities can reduce recording time, improve the quality and consistency of case notes, enhance practitioner and resident experience, and provide a clear evidence base and governance model for scaling AI safely and responsibly within high-risk statutory social care contexts.

    Please see here the link to complete our Preliminary Market Engagement Survey on Microsoft Forms - forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx ↗

    The deadline for all responses is 17:00 on 28/07/2026. Any submissions after this deadline may not be considered.

    Please note that information provided by organisations will be considered, but will not necessarily affect the outcome of the final tender documentation or the procurement process as a whole.

    Interested parties will not be prejudiced by any response or (lack of) to this survey. Nor shall a response to this survey guarantee an invitation to participate in any future procurement process that Essex County Council may conduct.

    Essex County Council is not liable for any costs, fees or expenses incurred by any party responding to this Market Engagement survey.

  3. Today
    21 Oct 2026
  4. Contract startsin 224 days
    2 Jun 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    14 Jul 2026, 17:03 BST
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Essex County Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PWVM-4844-NRQH County Hall, Market Road, Chelmsford, East of England, CM1 1QHContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure