Official UK procurement notice
Anti-Social Driving Case Management System with Public Facing Website interface.
Authority: The Police & Crime Commissioner for Sussex (Police & fire)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Sussex is seeking to replace its existing Anti-Social Driving System with a modern case management solution. The proposed system may be hosted either within Sussex Police's cloud environment or within a supplier-hosted cloud infrastructure.
The solution should provide end-to-end case management functionality, enabling members of the public to report anti-social driving incidents through a public-facing website and supporting the investigation process through to case resolution.
The system must include a public-facing reporting form that can be customised to reflect Sussex Police branding and configurable data collection requirements. The form should allow users to upload and submit digital evidence as part of their report.
The back-office component should provide a CRM-style case management dashboard, enabling officers and staff to review, investigate, update, and transfer cases as required. The solution should support configurable case fields, tagging and categorisation capabilities, workflow management, and effective case tracking throughout the investigation lifecycle.
Integration with email and correspondence management functionality is required to support the generation and delivery of letters and electronic communications, ensuring that members of the public can be kept informed of case progress and outcomes.
The proposed solution must be modern, scalable, future-proof, fully supported, and accessible across a range of devices and platforms, including mobile devices.
In addition, we would like suppliers to outline the available options, technical approach, and associated costs for integrating the solution with the Police National Computer (PNC) and/or the Law Enforcement Data Service (LEDS), enabling submitted information to be checked against relevant policing records where appropriate.
Responding:
If you believe your organisation can provide the above functionality, please email [email protected] to receive a copy of the request for information document for completion and return by the 16th September 2026.
CPV: Business transaction and personal business software package · Communication and multimedia software package · Database and operating software package · Industry specific software package · Miscellaneous software package and computer systems · Networking, Internet and intranet software package
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1Planned
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How The Police & Crime Commissioner for Sussex buys Industry specific software package (CPV 4810), and who usually turns up
The Police & Crime Commissioner for Sussex’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Industry specific software package (CPV 4810) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in South East England (authority’s region).
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in South East England.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 42 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid25% / 17%
2–363% / 35%
4–613% / 35%
7+0% / 13%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate75%
Within ±2%17%
Above estimate8%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 4810Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 39 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid10%
2–326%
4–641%
7+23%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Goods
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Below threshold
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 19 Aug 2026, 14:57 BST
- Last source update
- 19 Aug 2026, 14:57 BST
- Authority reference
JPS3277- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-079083- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Not published
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06e7d2Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
19 Aug 2026 → 1 Jan 2027 · 3 dates- Planning notice published64 days ago19 Aug 2026, 14:57 BST
- Market engagement36 days ago16 Sept 2026, 23:59 BST
If you believe your organisation can provide the required functionality, please email [email protected] to request a copy of the RFI document for completion and return by 4pm on the 16th September 2026
- Today22 Oct 2026
- Contract startsin 71 days1 Jan 2027
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published19 Aug 2026, 14:57 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender