Refinitiv Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

LondonGreater LondonMain market: Networking software package

Procedures with an award33 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities3named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£206knet · on 2 of 3 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months2awards · 1 in the prior 24 months · last 19 Mar 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months2end date published on 2 of 3 awards
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Delivery regions2most often Yorkshire and the Humber
i

Where this supplier has delivered.

Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.

Where the work was, not where the company is based.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.

3 awards (3 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 3

Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£206kOn 2 of 3 award records; the five largest make 100%; a further 1 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£45k inc. VAT, kept apart). Largest rows below.
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Sanction Screening ServicesBritish Council—2 yrs£162,540 †
≈ £81k/yr
SEDOl License AgreementBORDER TO COAST PENSIONS PARTNERSHIP LIMITED19 Mar 20261 yrs£43,085
≈ £43k/yr

Where they deliver
i

Where this supplier has delivered.

Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.

Where the work was, not where the company is based.

ITL1 delivery regions on the notice · 2 of 3 awarded procedures publish one · a procedure with several regions counts in each

Yorkshire and the Humber1 procedures · 50%
South East England1 procedures · 50%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Education33%(1 awards)
    1 of 3 awards are Education (33%).
  • Local authority33%(1 awards)
    1 of 3 awards are Local authority (33%).
  • Other public body33%(1 awards)
    1 of 3 awards are Other public body (33%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
British Council133.3%19 Jan 2026
BORDER TO COAST PENSIONS PARTNERSHIP LIMITED133.3%119 Mar 2026
University of Kent133.3%130 Sept 2025

Share = of the 3 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 2 of 3 awards carry one · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
License Agreement with LSE for SEDOL23 Mar 2027£43,085
Sanction Screening Services8 Jan 2028£162,540

Recent awards

Latest 3 of 3 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
SEDOl License AgreementBORDER TO COAST PENSIONS PARTNERSHIP LIMITED19 Mar 2026£43,085
LSEG Workspace Student LicencesUniversity of Kent30 Sept 2025£45,249
Sanction Screening ServicesBritish CouncilNot published£162,540 †
from the contract notice
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 2 of 3 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.