Practicality Brown Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyIverSouth East EnglandMain market: Forestry services

Companies House02114017 ↗ · Active

Where they win
i

5 awards (5 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 5 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

7720 Forestry services2 awards · 40% · awards naming a lot
9070 Environmental services2 awards · 40% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i
£36kOn 1 of 5 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Largest published awards
i
AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Eartham & Selhurst NS Residue & Stump MulchingForestry Commission—7 mo£36,421 †

Where their buyers are
i

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 5 of 5 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

South West England3 procedures · 60%
North West England1 procedure · 20%
West Midlands1 procedure · 20%

Who they sell to
i

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
  • Other public body60%(3 awards)
    3 of 5 awards are Other public body (60%).
  • Local authority40%(2 awards)
    2 of 5 awards are Local authority (40%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Forestry Commissionframework/DPS on 2360%325 Sept 2026
Borough of Telford & Wrekinframework/DPS on 1120%22 Sept 2025
KIER TRANSPORTATION LIMITED120%11 Nov 2023

Share = of the 5 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

6 of 6 awards carry an end date · not a retender forecast

ContractEndsPublished value
Eartham & Selhurst NS Residue & Stump Mulching31 Mar 2027£36,421

Recent awards

Latest 5 of 5 award records naming this supplier

Contracts Finder adds 1 more procedure won by this supplier, mostly below the Find a Tender threshold or from before 2025. Each is counted once beside any Find a Tender copy; they are in the totals, not in this list.

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
ContingencyForestry Commission25 Sept 2026£78,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 6 appointed suppliers
Lot 6 General Wetland Habitat CreationBorough of Telford & Wrekin2 Sept 2025£160,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 6 appointed suppliers
Lot 7 Great Crested Newt PondsBorough of Telford & Wrekin2 Sept 2025£400,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 6 appointed suppliers
Eartham & Selhurst NS Residue & Stump MulchingForestry CommissionNot published£36,421 †
from the contract notice
Wetland Restoration Framework – South DistrictForestry CommissionNot published£166,667 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 3 appointed suppliers
About this data
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 6 of 6 awards, estimated from the published duration on 0 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.