North East Autism Society: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Large organisationCompanies House: PRI/LBG/NSC (Private, Limited by guarantee, no share capital, use of 'Limited' exemption)VCSEChester le StreetNorth East England

Companies House02859620 ↗ · Active

Where they win
i

12 awards (11 for a named lot, 92%, 1 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 12 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

8532 Social services1 award · 8% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i
£9.9mOn 4 of 12 award records; the five largest make 100%; a further 6 published a VAT-inclusive amount only (£197k inc. VAT, kept apart). Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i
£46k middle valuemoderate · n=4
Award vs estimate
i

Based on 1 wins across all categories. Small sample.

10.1% below estimateindicative · n=1compared within all comparable wins

Where their buyers are
i

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 38 of 38 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

North East England37 procedures · 97%
North West England1 procedure · 3%

Bidding record
i

Procurement Act 2023 award notices name every bidder · 1 notice names this supplier since 16 Jul 2025 · observed bids, not an estimate

Contract lots contested
i
1 won · 0 lostindicative · n=1Fewer than three decided lots: no rate is claimed.
Authorities bid for
i
1

Bidder names come from Procurement Act 2023 award notices, which list every bidder (from 2025). Older notices name no bidders, so earlier contests do not appear here. Latest ten notices shown.

Who they sell to
i

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
  • Local authority92%(11 awards)
    11 of 12 awards are Local authority (92%).
  • NHS & health8%(1 award)
    1 of 12 awards is NHS & health (8%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Darlington Borough Council2873.7%281 Sept 2025
North Tyneside Councilframework/DPS on 137.9%37 Feb 2023
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Councilframework/DPS on 125.3%216 Jul 2025
Durham County Council25.3%219 Jul 2025
NHS North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board12.6%16 Mar 1973
Newcastle City Councilframework/DPS on 112.6%129 Jun 2022
Northumberland County Council12.6%130 Sept 2021

Share = of the 38 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Recent awards

Latest 12 of 12 award records naming this supplier

Contracts Finder adds 26 more procedures won by this supplier, mostly below the Find a Tender threshold or from before 2025. Each is counted once beside any Find a Tender copy; they are in the totals, not in this list.

About this data
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 34 of 38 awards, estimated from the published duration on 1 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.