Event Traffic Control Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyCompanies House status: In AdministrationBaldersby, ThirskNationwide (UK)Main market: Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines, for highways, roads, airfields and railways; flatwork

Companies House08625028 ↗

Procedures with an award68 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities2named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Places on lists and panels33 places · lists worth £9.1m in total, shared with other providers, not its revenue
i

Approved provider lists and panels this supplier is on.

Procedures where the same published amount is awarded to three or more suppliers: the total of the list, repeated on every place. Each list counts once in the total.

A place on a list is not money won. The total belongs to the whole list.

Last 12 months0no award in the last 12 months · last 1 Jul 2025
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Buyer regions1most often Yorkshire and the Humber
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.

8 awards (4 for a named lot, 50%, 4 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 8

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 6 of 6 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Yorkshire and the Humber6 procedures · 100%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Type not classified50%(4 awards)
    4 of 8 awards are Type not classified (50%).
  • Other public body38%(3 awards)
    3 of 8 awards are Other public body (38%).
  • Local authority13%(1 awards)
    1 of 8 awards are Local authority (13%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
NY HIGHWAYS LIMITEDframework/DPS on 2583.3%71 Jul 2025
Kirklees Councilframework/DPS on 1116.7%123 Aug 2022

Share = of the 6 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Recent awards

Latest 8 of 8 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Traffic Management Services (Reserve)NY HIGHWAYS LIMITEDNot published£185,082 †
list or panel total · repeated on other suppliers, not counted as its value
Traffic Management ServicesNY HIGHWAYS LIMITEDNot published£6,460,000 †
list or panel total · repeated on other suppliers, not counted as its value
Highway Maintenance Gangs & Other OperativesNY HIGHWAYS LIMITEDNot published£2,500,000 †
list or panel total · repeated on other suppliers, not counted as its value
Framework Agreement for the Provision and Maintenance of Traffic Management - Yorkshire Highway Alliance ContractKirklees CouncilNot published£320,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 18 appointed suppliers
Supply of Traffic Management Service in the Hambleton District areaNY HIGHWAYS LIMITEDNot published£80,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 3 appointed suppliers
Supply of Traffic Management Service in the Harrogate Borough areaNY HIGHWAYS LIMITEDNot published£80,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 3 appointed suppliers
Lot 1: Richmondshire and HambletonNY HIGHWAYS LIMITEDNot published£100,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
Lot 3: Craven and HarrogateNY HIGHWAYS LIMITEDNot published£100,000 †
framework ceiling · not attributable revenue
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 8 of 8 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.