Cygnet Texkimp Limited: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMECompanies House: Private Limited CompanyNorthwich, CheshireNorth West EnglandMain market: Miscellaneous special-purpose machinery

Companies House04115619 ↗ · Active

Where they win
i

5 awards (5 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 5 awards. An award may cover more than one class.

4299 Miscellaneous special-purpose machinery3 awards · 60% · awards naming a lot
Attributable award value
i
£4.0mOn 5 of 5 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i
£280k middle valuerobust · n=5
Award vs estimate
i

Based on 1 wins across all categories. Small sample.

1.6% below estimateindicative · n=1compared within all comparable wins

Where their buyers are
i

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 7 of 7 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

North West England2 procedures · 29%
Yorkshire and the Humber2 procedures · 29%
South West England2 procedures · 29%
East of England1 procedure · 14%

Who they sell to
i

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i
  • Education80%(4 awards)
    4 of 5 awards are Education (80%).
  • Type not classified20%(1 award)
    1 of 5 awards is Type not classified (20%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
University of Bristol228.6%228 Feb 2024
The University of Sheffield228.6%221 Aug 2024
UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER228.6%226 Jun 2023
TWI Ltd114.3%18 Dec 2021

Share = of the 7 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Recent awards

Latest 5 of 5 award records naming this supplier

Contracts Finder adds 2 more procedures won by this supplier, mostly below the Find a Tender threshold or from before 2025. Each is counted once beside any Find a Tender copy; they are in the totals, not in this list.

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastic Tape Development Cell R2The University of SheffieldNot published£1,092,590 †
from the contract notice
The supply of a novel micro carbonfibre line of modular construction for R&D purposes.University of BristolNot published£2,117,000 †
from the contract notice
High Temperature and pressure Steam rig for Polymer-composite Disassembly(HTSPD)UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTERNot published£258,400 †
from the contract notice
Design and Manufacture of a Filament Winding CapabilityUniversity of BristolNot published£222,435 †
from the contract notice
REF: MIC-37-FW - Filament WinderTWI LtdNot published£279,700 †
from the contract notice
About this data
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 5 of 7 awards, estimated from the published duration on 1 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.