Call & Response Studios ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Companies House: Private Limited CompanyLondonGreater LondonMain market: Motion picture and video tape production and related services

Companies House13074727 ↗

Procedures with an award22 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities2named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£16knet · on 1 of 2 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months2awards · 0 in the prior 24 months · last 25 Sept 2026
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months1end date published on 1 of 2 awards
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Delivery regions1most often Greater London
i

Where this supplier has delivered.

Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.

Where the work was, not where the company is based.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.

2 awards (2 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 2

Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£16kOn 1 of 2 award records; the five largest make 100%. Largest rows below.
Award vs estimate
i

Does this supplier usually win above or below the buyer’s estimate.

Its own wins, estimate against award per lot, in its sector.

Based on 1 wins in its industry (CPV division 92). Small sample.

A past pattern, not a margin and not a price to bid.

12.6% below estimateindicative · n=1compared within CPV division 92
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Sound Design and Recording Services - Manchester Cotton and Transatlantic Slavery ExhibitionScience Museum Group—1 yrs£15,650 †
≈ £16k/yr

Where they deliver
i

Where this supplier has delivered.

Delivery regions published on its awarded tenders. A tender with several regions counts in each.

Where the work was, not where the company is based.

ITL1 delivery regions on the notice · 1 of 2 awarded procedures publish one · a procedure with several regions counts in each

Greater London1 procedures · 100%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Central government100%(2 awards)
    2 of 2 awards are Central government (100%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Science Museum Group150%125 Sept 2026
Imperial War Museumframework/DPS on 1150%12 Jul 2026

Share = of the 2 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Published contracts with an end date in that window. No end date, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Published end dates only · 1 of 2 awards carry one · not a retender forecast

Recent awards

Latest 2 of 2 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
SOUND DESIGNImperial War Museum2 Jul 2026£75,000
framework ceiling · 1 of 3 appointed suppliers
Sound Design and Recording Services - Manchester Cotton and Transatlantic Slavery ExhibitionScience Museum GroupNot published£15,650 †
from the contract notice
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 1 of 2 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.