The Corporation of Trinity House: Contract Register & Procurement Profile

Greater LondonLondon

Find a Tender organisation id8629Websitedelta-esourcing.com ↗

Open now0no live notices
i

Tenders you can still bid for.

Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.

Notices, last 12 months70 in the prior 12 months
i

Notices published in the last 12 months.

Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.

Top-3 supplier share67%of 12 awarded procedures · 13 suppliers
i

How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.

Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.

12 awarded tenders, 13 different suppliers.

Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.

All awards we hold.

What they buy
i

What kind of work is bought here.

Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.

Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each

How they buy
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

Last 24 months · 7 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim

Commercial tool
i

How work here is packaged.

Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.

  • Dynamic purchasing system100%(7 notices)
    7 of 7 notices are Dynamic purchasing system (100%).
Procedure route
i

Which procedures buyers here use.

Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.

  • Selective100%(7 notices)
    7 of 7 notices are Selective (100%).
Notice amendments
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on 7 notices across all categories, last 24 months.

Last 24 months.

00 of 7 notices amended

Who wins here
i

Which suppliers win the most here.

Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.

All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records

SupplierProceduresShareLast 24mAward recordsLast activity
Southampton Marine Servicesframework/DPS on 6650%66—
UK DOCKS MARINE SERVICES LIMITEDframework/DPS on 118.3%11—
BDB Pitmans LLPframework/DPS on 118.3%04—
FENDERCARE LTDframework/DPS on 118.3%03—
Williams Marine Lubricants Ltdframework/DPS on 118.3%03—
Gowling WLG (UK) LLPframework/DPS on 118.3%03—
William Hackett Chain Products Ltdframework/DPS on 118.3%03—
Ashfords LLPframework/DPS on 118.3%02—

The three most frequent suppliers are named on 67% of 12 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 13 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.

Recent procedures

Latest 23 of 23 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement

ProcedureStatusPublishedPublished value
Trinity House Vessel Replacement ProgrammeShips and boatsNot published23 Apr 2021—
C1009 - Cubicle Framework Call Off - Contract AwardElectronicAwarded / complete16 Mar 2021—
Trinity House Vessel Replacement ProgrammeShips and boatsOpen12 Mar 2021£28,000,000

Search all 23 procedures for this authority →

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
  • Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
  • Contract end dates. 15 of 24 published contracts have an end date; 15 of those are estimated as the signature (or publication) date plus the published duration and are marked “estimated”. They feed “Contracts ending”, the same rule as the retender radar.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.