Official UK procurement notice
Technical Toolkits – Support, Maintenance and Development Framework
Authority: Radioactive Waste Management Limited
What is being bought4 lots · detail below
Published requirement descriptionRWM requires third party contract support to develop, support and maintain the Safety Case Management System (Lot 1) which references the outputs of other toolkits developed under the Inventory toolkit (Lot 2) and the Nuclear Safety Toolkit (Lot 3). All are underpinned by DIG Client (Lot 4) which is designed to allow users to create and update a number of XML-based electronic forms which store data and information on its use. All Lots in part, share Common Services (Lot 5) whilst requiring discreet services tailored to their system.
All these systems are supporting the location identification, design and construction of a GDF (Geological Disposal Facility) which is the first facility of its type in the UK.
CPV: IT services: consulting, software development, Internet and support · Software package and information systems
How this framework works
From the published notice- Places
- up to 4 suppliers
Lots and requirements (4)Procurement structure
4 lots · all with a published valueLot #1Safety Case Management System (ViSI) Toolkit seeks to appoint a single contracting organisation/ consortiumRenewalPublished value£350,000
The primary objectives of Lot 1 Safety Case Management System Toolkit are:
ViSI (Visualisation of System Information) is a toolkit which RWM has developed internally to manage (including its evidence base) and facilitate the demonstration of a robust safety case for a Geological Disposal Facility.
In a detailed document, such as an environmental safety case, it can be difficult to follow how each claim relates to underlying arguments and associated evidence as a result of the volume of information which is relevant. This may lead to loss of clarity regarding whether the safety case is robust or whether there may be gaps in claims, safety arguments, or evidence.
The extant VISI system is written in several programming languages. RWM requires a development team to undertake tasks as directed by the RWM in-house team. RWM has an agreed vision and strategy for the development of ViSI, through the ViSI roadmap. While the ViSI system has a roadmap, it is not possible to define the precise functional requirements of the system.
Therefore, RWM will use the agile software development methodology as recommended by Government Digital Service guidelines to replicate successful working arrangements previously used.
The successful bidder for Lot 1 will be expected to provide both support, maintenance, along with the development of the VISI system, and associated components that are required for, or compliment, the system (e.g.: tools for editing, updating, and managing content).
It is anticipated that the Services (as called off from the Framework Agreement) are required to fix bugs (or other issues) and to develop and or improve the VISI system (e.g.: by addressing feature requests). Queries or critical fixes are likely to need fixing at short notice (however, the time to develop a fix or workaround itself is likely to be small) while improvements are likely to take a greater level of effort but have less urgency. The scope of Services shall include all developments of VISI over the period, including code development, testing, documentation, installation/deployment, and technical/architectural advice, together with any other support needed.
Lot #2Inventory Toolkit seeks to appoint a single contracting organisation/ consortiumRenewalPublished value£250,000
The primary objectives of Lot 2 Inventory Toolkit
The inventory toolkits have been developed independently since the 1990s. Data routinely needs to be manually copied between them and there are overlaps in the stored data and code.
There are two main issues that this has introduced: -
- Data management: each toolkit has its own data store and can use different underpinning data or different code to achieve the same purpose, potentially leading to inconsistencies. Manually copying data between toolkits is error-prone and time consuming. The inability to control who uses the toolkits, or which version of the toolkit they use introduces the potential for further errors.
- Efficiency: because of the technology choices and lack of integration the toolkits are costly to maintain and time-consuming to use when data needs to be moved between them
Data and toolkit management issues in other areas have previously had a significant detrimental impact on our reputation (e.g.: thermal modelling errors). Inventory data is an important input to the GDF designs and safety cases, as well as disposability assessments. Hence any errors in the inventory data could impact on our safety cases and disposability assessment advice. As we move through the siting process, there is a risk that such errors would have a significant impact on our attempt to find a willing host community. It is important to minimise this risk.
The successful bidder for Lot 2 will be expected to provide all aspects of software development for the inventory toolkits including backlog management, development of user stories, version control, test plans, bug fixing and deployment. Additionally, the successful bidder will be expected to provide support to users and maintenance to the existing inventory toolkits.
Lot #3Nuclear Safety Case Toolkit seeks to appoint a single contracting organisation/ consortiumRenewalPublished value£400,000
The primary objectives of Lot 3 Nuclear Safety Case Toolkit:
RWM is developing its capability to undertake operational safety assessments in support of site evaluation and waste management. A digital capability has been chosen to align with the function’s broader aim of implementing Building Information Modelling (BIM) as mandated by government. The objective of the OSSS project is to provide the software tools that will facilitate this approach. These are primarily database and configuration management tools that will ease the production of a reliable, consistent, and auditable safety case; calculations are only one part of the total capability.
The scope of this procurement is to build, test and deploy the software such that it delivers the capability defined in the specifications
The successful bidder for Lot 3 will be expected to provide all aspects of software development including backlog management, capture of user needs, version control, test plans, documentation, bug fixing and deployment
Lot #4Dig Client seeks to appoint a single contracting organisation/ consortiumRenewalPublished value£150,000
The primary objectives of Lot 4 Dig Client:
DIG is a bespoke suite of client applications used to create and edit a number of XML-based electronic forms to record numerical data and its associated uses. The suite includes capabilities to convert units and import/export data into a number of different formats for use in RWM’s modelling and reporting workflows.
The successful bidder for Lot 4 will be expected to provide:
Support, maintenance and development of the DIG suite as required by RWM over the period. This includes the provision of bug fixes, maintenance (to ensure compatibility with RWM’s current and future systems) and new developments (including the migration of functionality, or ability to interface with, any future Common Data Environment commissioned by RWM). The suite is largely written in .NET with C# with a number of elements written in other languages (e.g. Python, C).
Lot 5 Common Shared Services: will be formed by the successful bidders for the above. The successful bidders will be invited to mini tender under this framework for common services associated with all the Technical Toolkits named as described in the specifications. RWM reserves the right to direct award work under Lot 5 up to the value of £50k per task.
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
- Suitability
List and brief description of conditions: Bidders will be assessed in accordance with Section 5 of the 2015 Public Contract Regulations (implementing the Directive) on the basis of information provided in response to an Invitation to Tender (“ITT”).
Registering for access.
This procurement will be managed electronically via the CTM eSourcing portal. This will be the primary route for sharing all information and communicating with bidders.
If not alreadt registered, you will first need to register your organisation on the portal.
To register, you will need to:
- Go to the URL: https://
sharedsystems.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=12954&B=SELLAFIELD
- “Technical Toolkits – Support, Maintenance and Development Framework” is a framework: the contest is a place on its panel, up to 4 suppliers, not a single contract.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Closed
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Framework agreement
- Who may use this agreement
- Not stated in the notice; call-off rights may be limited to the establishing authority
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- No (one-off requirement)
- First published
- 25 Oct 2021, 12:12 BST
- Last source update
- 27 Oct 2021, 11:57 BST
- Award evaluation window
- 15 Nov 2021 – …
- Authority reference
RWM176- FTS notice number
2021/S 000-026888- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-02ef75Find a Tender
- Review procedure
Precise information on deadline(s) for review procedures:
Any appeals should be promptly brought to the attention of the contact specified in Section I above, and will be dealt with in accordance with the requirements of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. Any appeals must be brought within the timescales specified by the applicable law, including without limitation, the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. In accordance with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, the Contracting Authority will also incorporate a minimum 10 calendar day standstill period from the date information on award of contract is communicated to tenderers.
How it was run
Official notice- Appointment period ends
- 15 Nov 2021, 12:00 GMT
- Submission channel
- {"electronicSubmission","written"}
- Accepted languages
- en
- Bids opened
- 15 Nov 2021, 12:00 GMT
Timeline
27 Oct 2021 → 15 Nov 2021 · 3 dates- Notice published27 Oct 2021, 11:57 BST
- Admission / appointment period endsperiod end, not a bid countdown15 Nov 2021, 12:00 GMT
- Bids opened15 Nov 2021, 12:00 GMT
Notice history
3 releases on Find a TenderPublished amendments (2 · 0 deadline changes)
| When | What | Before | After | Shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ClassificationAdditional CPV code(s) · II.2.2 | — | — | |
| — | TextI.3) Communication | The procurement documents are available for unrestricted and full direct access, free of charge, at https://sharedsystems.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/edittransaction.asp?TID=13778 Additional information can be obtained from the above-mentioned address Tenders or requests to participate must be submitted electronically via https://sharedsystems.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/edittransaction.asp?TID=13778 Tenders … | The procurement documents are available for unrestricted and full direct access, free of charge, at https://sharedsystems.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/14157/1/0 Tenders or requests to participate must be submitted to the above-mentioned address |
2 amendments published without a description.
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Dispute resolution & review bodies
- Radioactive Waste Management LtdReview contact point
- Royal Courts of JusticeMediation bodyReview body
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Economic and financial selection criteria
- Technical selection criteria