Official UK procurement notice
Step Forward Tees Valley Programme Evaluation
Authority: Humankind Charity
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionMarket Research and Evaluation Services
CPV: Economic research services · Market research services · Social research services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1The purpose of this invitation to tender is to appoint a suitably experienced…Awarded
The purpose of this invitation to tender is to appoint a suitably experienced contractor to provide an independent and objective assessment of programme performance and impact from 1 January 2020 onwards. As well as giving us access to specialist research and evaluation skills, this will also provide independent and credible feedback on performance, effectiveness, and impact, highlighting additional learning and opportunities for improvement.
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published award criteria (2)
- Quality: 75.00%
- Price: 25.00%
- Suitability
As stated within procurement documents
- Price carries 25 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 2.5 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Awarded
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- No (one-off requirement)
- First published
- 18 May 2021, 16:33 BST
- Last source update
- 30 Nov 2021, 07:30 GMT
- Award evaluation window
- 3 Jun 2021 – …
- Authority reference
CA8813 -- FTS notice number
2021/S 000-029636- Accelerated
The Purpose of this Accelerated Open Procedure is to ensure we utilise the knowledge and experience of staff involved with the Step Forward Tees Valley Programme who will be soon departing the charity to lead on the qualitative evaluations of all tender submissions received and also any subsequent supplier clarification meetings which form part of the evaluation process.
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-02b262Find a Tender
- Performance terms
As stated within procurement documents
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- 3 Jun 2021, 12:00 BST
- Submission channel
- {"electronicSubmission","written"}
- Accepted languages
- en
- Bids opened
- 3 Jun 2021, 12:00 BST
Timeline
3 Jun 2021 → 30 Nov 2021 · 3 dates- Submission deadline3 Jun 2021, 12:00 BST
- Bids opened3 Jun 2021, 12:00 BST
- Notice published30 Nov 2021, 07:30 GMT
Notice history
1 event · 2 releases on Find a Tender- Status changed to complete30 Nov 2021, 07:30 GMT
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Published awards, contracts and bid statistics, not a forecast| Awarded to | Value | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ERS LtdSME | £144,800 † | — | Awarded |
Contracts
Step Forward Tees Valley Programme Evaluation · ERS LtdSME
- Signed
- 30 Nov 2021
- Value
- £144,800
- Status
- active
Bid statistics published by the authority
| Bids | SME | VCSE | Valid bid range |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2bids | — | — | — |
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Bidders & participating suppliers
1 commercial party on the notice- ERSAwarded supplier
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Economic and financial selection criteria
- Technical selection criteria