Official UK procurement notice
Provision of Data Warehouse
Authority: Home Office (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionPLEASE NOTE THAT THIS OPPOTUNITY IS WITH THE COLLEGE OF POLICING, LEAMINGTON RD, RYTON-ON-DUNSMORE, COVENTRY, CV8 3EN. THIS NOTICE IS BEING ISSUED UNDER A CONTINGENCY MEASURE WHEREBY FIND A TENDER IS CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE.
The College needs a consolidated and standardised data warehouse to improve reporting, data quality, and strategic decision making. Current data sits across College Learn and LTM/Access Point systems, creating fragmented insights, manual processes, and inconsistent reporting. It is also currently not possible to provide a contemporaneous data service to policing to consume their data.
The project supports a wider organisational goal to improve governance, reduce manual effort, and provide reliable insight to policing stakeholders, senior leaders, and internal analysts.
- How the procedure runs: PSQ, Tender, Presentation,Contract
CPV: Compliance software package · Database and operating software development services · Database software development services · Database software package · Development software development services · Development software package · IT software development services · IT software package · Industry specific software development services · Networking software package · Platform interconnectivity software development services · Platform interconnectivity software package · +7 more
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1PlannedPublished value£416,667
- Economic & financial standing
This will be detailed in the PSQ
- Technical & professional ability
This will be detailed in the Tender Documentation at time of go live of tender
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
- Economic & financial standing
This will be detailed in the PSQ
- Technical & professional ability
This will be detailed in the Tender Documentation at time of go live of tender
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Home Office buys Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221), and who usually turns up
Home Office’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 49 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid11% / 4%
2–337% / 33%
4–641% / 33%
7+11% / 30%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate46% / 47%
Within ±2%34% / 33%
Above estimate20% / 19%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 7221Published estimate£417k
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 81 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid4%
2–333%
4–633%
7+30%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Competitive flexible procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 18 May 2026, 15:50 BST
- Last source update
- 18 May 2026, 15:50 BST
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end – 1 Oct 2026
- Authority reference
COP14_2026- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-045438- Accelerated
- Qualifying planned procurement notice
- Latest notice
- Planned procurement notice (UK3)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-069b31Find a Tender
- How it runs
PSQ, Tender, Presentation,Contract
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- 7 Aug 2026, 11:00 BST
- Clarification deadline
- 3 Jul 2026, 11:00 BST
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Through the Home Office Jaggaer e-sourcing portal
Timeline
18 May 2026 → 1 Oct 2026 · 6 dates- Planning notice published159 days ago18 May 2026, 15:50 BST
- Tender notice expected116 days ago29 Jun 2026, 23:59 BST
- Clarification questions by113 days ago3 Jul 2026, 11:00 BST
- Submission deadline78 days ago7 Aug 2026, 11:00 BST
- Contract starts23 days ago1 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
- Award decision expected by22 days ago1 Oct 2026, 23:59 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Planned procurement notice published18 May 2026, 15:50 BSTUK3
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Planned procurement notice Planned procurement notice on Find a Tender